Opera Continues to differ with Microsoft


Recommended Posts

after calling for the boycott last post i decided to make a little program that should make it easier.

i'm including my code incase anyone else wishes to test it

#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>

using namespace std;

int main()
{
	char answer;
	cout << "Welcome to BlockOpera, the program that is going to punish the litigious annoying *******" << endl;
	cout << "This program needs administrator priviliages to run." << endl;
	cout << "If you are running Windows Vista or higher you will likely need to right-click on the program icon and choose 'Run as Administrator' for this program to work";
	cout << endl;
	cout << "Do you want to proceed to block access to opera.com? (y or n)";
	cin >> answer;
	if (answer == 'y')
	{
		ofstream myfile;
		myfile.exceptions (ifstream::failbit | ifstream::badbit);
		try{
			myfile.open ("c:/windows/system32/drivers/etc/hosts", ios::app);
			  myfile << "127.0.0.1\t opera.com\n127.0.0.1\twww.opera.com";
			  myfile.close();
		}
		catch (ifstream::failure e) {
			cout << "You could not open the file, likely because of lack of administrator privilages << endl";
		}
	}
	return 0;
}

BlockOpera.zip

I agree with Opera, I have talk to a few people who isn't "geekly" and I know when they see IE or the IE's logo they don't think its a browser, they think it is the internet and because they think it's the internet they don't going looking for other options.

Remember this isn't just Opera, all other browsers including Google and Mozilla has join this as well, so for all you guys who are boycotting Opera, you should be boycotting Google and Mozilla as well.

So why don't you guys think about this first, before you fanboys go off and defend your company Microsoft.

I don't think Google or Mozilla have the gall (or the utter stupidity) to request that Microsoft completely rebrand its browser. Even if it was the right thing to do, those big companies know that such an action is NOT FEASIBLE.

It's like going to Apple and saying, "we really think iPod is too associated with consumer MP3 devices, we think you should rename it to be 'Apple Generic Player 5'"

I agree with Opera, I have talk to a few people who isn't "geekly" and I know when they see IE or the IE's logo they don't think its a browser, they think it is the internet and because they think it's the internet they don't going looking for other options.

Remember this isn't just Opera, all other browsers including Google and Mozilla has join this as well, so for all you guys who are boycotting Opera, you should be boycotting Google and Mozilla as well.

So why don't you guys think about this first, before you fanboys go off and defend your company Microsoft.

Let me see...considering we are talking about users who can't tell internet different from the blue "e" logo, if we remove the logo(s) and present them with a list

- Windows Internet Explorer

- Google Chrome

- Mozilla Firefox

- Opera

which of the above the user is most likely to pick? I will wait for you to facepalm yourself when you realize how dumb this new suggestion from Opera sounds. I haven't seen Google or Mozilla's response on this (remove icon thingy) yet so not sure what you are talking about here.

I agree with Opera, I have talk to a few people who isn't "geekly" and I know when they see IE or the IE's logo they don't think its a browser, they think it is the internet and because they think it's the internet they don't going looking for other options.

Remember this isn't just Opera, all other browsers including Google and Mozilla has join this as well, so for all you guys who are boycotting Opera, you should be boycotting Google and Mozilla as well.

So why don't you guys think about this first, before you fanboys go off and defend your company Microsoft.

that's the new defense for Opera now?? but Mozilla and Google are doing it too don't forget them. I don't see google and mozilla whining like cry babies, they signed on and so far have been pretty much silent supporters letting Opera do a good job of running themselves into the ground.

I agree with Opera, I have talk to a few people who isn't "geekly" and I know when they see IE or the IE's logo they don't think its a browser, they think it is the internet and because they think it's the internet they don't going looking for other options.

Remember this isn't just Opera, all other browsers including Google and Mozilla has join this as well, so for all you guys who are boycotting Opera, you should be boycotting Google and Mozilla as well.

So why don't you guys think about this first, before you fanboys go off and defend your company Microsoft.

not really Opera started this and they didn't, firefox and google would do anything,why because there doing great and don't have to get as low as suing microsoft

Remember this isn't just Opera, all other browsers including Google and Mozilla has join this as well, so for all you guys who are boycotting Opera, you should be boycotting Google and Mozilla as well.

So why don't you guys think about this first, before you fanboys go off and defend your company Microsoft.

Read

This thread is about Opera's CEO comments not the EU action against MS in general. If Schmidt or Lilly bitches about how MS incorporates icons into what already amounts to a huge concession, let me know.

not really Opera started this and they didn't, firefox and google would do anything,why because there doing great and don't have to get as low as suing microsoft

Not only they are doing great but Firefox now actually has larger marketshare.. If people really associated IE logo with internet this wouldn't be the case. Simple.

Even Safari and Chrome who are fairly new browsers simply raped Opera's market share..

All this shows that Opera simply isn't capable to compete in the fair market and have to resort with completely retarded actions like this.

And after whole hoopla, people still won't get their browser because if they are not using IE they will most likely use Firefox or Google Chrome because most people actually considers Google to be a browser. Majority of people actually think that browser is a search engine. Only 8% know what a browser is.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4MwTvtyrUQ.swf

I agree with Opera, I have talk to a few people who isn't "geekly" and I know when they see IE or the IE's logo they don't think its a browser, they think it is the internet and because they think it's the internet they don't going looking for other options.

Remember this isn't just Opera, all other browsers including Google and Mozilla has join this as well, so for all you guys who are boycotting Opera, you should be boycotting Google and Mozilla as well.

So why don't you guys think about this first, before you fanboys go off and defend your company Microsoft.

I know people who think they have to use iTunes to manage their iPods, or who think Norton is the only antivirus app available.

I don't see the problem, as sometimes an application can become so popular, the alternatives remain relatively-unknown.

Okay now... blocking scripts? Additions to the hosts file? Come on people... you don't fight ridiculousness with ridiculousness.

I didn't went that far. I just filtered it using opendns in my entire network, just in case someone will click a hotlink to Opera's site by mistake or get redirected to it.

...

Users never got the chance to choose, because Microsoft used it's monopoly it has on the OS market to force IE on anyone who used Windows and even Mac (in 1997, see the first browser war). Users should have a chance choose which browser they want, based on features, speed or whatever browser was cool at the time, and if they choose IE that's fine at least they was given a choice.

You guys can't deny Microsoft is using it OS market share to force the users to use IE. Microsoft knew what they was doing from the start they trick the users of Windows in thinking "Internet Explorer" was the only way to get on to the internet and it worked.

Microsoft should remove IE from their OS and replace it with a screen to explain what is a browser and give the user the chance to choose what browser they what to install and the whole "you can't download other browser without IE" argument is crap since Microsoft can quickly build a "browser installer" using FTP (yea, remember FTP?) since FTP is included with Windows already.

Once users are told what a browser is and told there is a choice out there they will start comparing browsers and choose the right one for them.

Users never got the chance to choose, because Microsoft used it's monopoly it has on the OS market to force IE on anyone who used Windows and even Mac (in 1997, see the first browser war). <snip>

So are you saying to BLAME them? Truer words never spoken Gerry.

Dear Microsoft,

I blame you for bringing the internet to millions. For providing me a wider audience to my web development creations, for helping create AXAX from XMLHttpRequest (a non W3C standard, IE proprietary), and most importantly, giving me a Web 2.0, 3D virtual world job at a university as a student. I blame you for giving me a future in computer networking and security degrees in hopes that I will have to fix up all the crap you created because you saw what was probably the right idea in bundiling a browser for the less technical to connect to the internet, providing SOME alternative to the ever so crappy AOL CD's that came with everthing down to the McDonalds Happy Meal. And even though I chose Netscape 'back in the day' over IE, you really should have made a closed software/hardware OS to prevent that and really take on the world, both real and virtual.

How dare you Microsoft! :laugh:

------------------------------------------------------

Never had a chance to choose... please. They still allowed Netscape to install didn't they? Things haven't changed since then either! They still allow Firefox, Opera, Safari, Chrome to all install don't they? And WinAMP? VLC? XBMC? MediaPortal? Nothing stops them from running. No random update to the OS breaks them (intentionally).

The world isn't ready for no-default install, make a choice only setup. They need both. Something there, and many something to choose from if they know what they are doing.

If Microsoft was Michael Jackson, would it have to DIE for people to see what it created?

Edited by cybertimber2008

For the longest time, Internet explorer has been easily the most recognized browser, since it's really the only choice people could go with. Netscape wasn't that great until Firefox (firebird then) came out.

I really strongly support the idea that people can choose the browser, not just in Europe, but anywhere, regardless of the locations. Mostly among the computer illiterate (calling them dumbass or whatever is just unfair), they will go with internet explorer because know what Internet explorer is. Not because of the icon, or what it says, it's just very recognized as IE has been around much longer than any other popular browsers.

People should also be made aware (and I hope the Browser ballot will say this) that you can have multiple browsers installed.

i would like to start a campaign.

I'm calling for everyone to localhost in their host file and in every host file they can access.

opera.com

www.opera.com

Hey if we are going to call on people to get involved in pointless campaigns, can I start a campaign asking everyone to use their hosts file to redirect google.com to my server full of horse pr0n? I mean google must be evil too right, they have a monopoly on the search market?

yes that was sarcasm, I don't have a server full of horse pr0n

after calling for the boycott last post i decided to make a little program that should make it easier.

i'm including my code incase anyone else wishes to test it

#include &lt;iostream&gt;
#include &lt;fstream&gt;

using namespace std;

int main()
{
	char answer;
	cout &lt;&lt; "Welcome to BlockOpera, the program that is going to punish the litigious annoying *******" &lt;&lt; endl;
	cout &lt;&lt; "This program needs administrator priviliages to run." &lt;&lt; endl;
	cout &lt;&lt; "If you are running Windows Vista or higher you will likely need to right-click on the program icon and choose 'Run as Administrator' for this program to work";
	cout &lt;&lt; endl;
	cout &lt;&lt; "Do you want to proceed to block access to opera.com? (y or n)";
	cin &gt;&gt; answer;
	if (answer == 'y')
	{
		ofstream myfile;
		myfile.exceptions (ifstream::failbit | ifstream::badbit);
		try{
			myfile.open ("c:/windows/system32/drivers/etc/hosts", ios::app);
			  myfile &lt;&lt; "127.0.0.1\t opera.com\n127.0.0.1\twww.opera.com";
			  myfile.close();
		}
		catch (ifstream::failure e) {
			cout &lt;&lt; "You could not open the file, likely because of lack of administrator privilages &lt;&lt; endl";
		}
	}
	return 0;
}

Wow. you have WAY too much free time on your hands

Not only they are doing great but Firefox now actually has larger marketshare.. If people really associated IE logo with internet this wouldn't be the case. Simple.

Not true, IE actually still has the biggest market share at the moment.

Oh and could you guys please host all your anti-opera banners on the same server so I don't have to keep content blocking them individually? thanks :laugh:

So are you saying to BLAME them? Truer words never spoken Gerry.

Dear Microsoft,

I blame you for bringing the internet to millions. For providing me a wider audience to my web development creations, for helping create AXAX from XMLHttpRequest (a non W3C standard, IE proprietary), and most importantly, giving me a Web 2.0, 3D virtual world job at a university as a student. I blame you for giving me a future in computer networking and security degrees in hopes that I will have to fix up all the crap you created because you saw what was probably the right idea in bundiling a browser for the less technical to connect to the internet, providing SOME alternative to the ever so crappy AOL CD's that came with everthing down to the McDonalds Happy Meal. And even though I chose Netscape 'back in the day' over IE, you really should have made a closed software/hardware OS to prevent that and really take on the world, both real and virtual.

How dare you Microsoft! :laugh:

------------------------------------------------------

Never had a chance to choose... please. They still allowed Netscape to install didn't they? Things haven't changed since then either! They still allow Firefox, Opera, Safari, Chrome to all install don't they? And WinAMP? VLC? XBMC? MediaPortal? Nothing stops them from running. No random update to the OS breaks them (intentionally).

The world isn't ready for no-default install, make a choice only setup. They need both. Something there, and many something to choose from if they know what they are doing.

If Microsoft was Michael Jackson, would it have to DIE for people to see what it created?

I take you are very young to remember the IE 4 fiasco, right?

Users never got the chance to choose, because Microsoft used it's monopoly it has on the OS market to force IE on anyone who used Windows and even Mac (in 1997, see the first browser war). Users should have a chance choose which browser they want, based on features, speed or whatever browser was cool at the time, and if they choose IE that's fine at least they was given a choice.

You guys can't deny Microsoft is using it OS market share to force the users to use IE. Microsoft knew what they was doing from the start they trick the users of Windows in thinking "Internet Explorer" was the only way to get on to the internet and it worked.

Microsoft should remove IE from their OS and replace it with a screen to explain what is a browser and give the user the chance to choose what browser they what to install and the whole "you can't download other browser without IE" argument is crap since Microsoft can quickly build a "browser installer" using FTP (yea, remember FTP?) since FTP is included with Windows already.

Once users are told what a browser is and told there is a choice out there they will start comparing browsers and choose the right one for them.

- Microsoft used Windows monopoly to force IE on Mac??? :blink: (AFAIK they made a deal with Apple for it, nothing illegal there)

- I have be around long enough to remember the browser war and Netscape had every reason to sink and die.

- It is true that Microsoft used Windows marketshare/"monopoly" to promote IE. But at no point of time I remember them forcing me to use IE. Not on Windows 95, 98 and even 3.11 :laugh:

- Microsoft offered to remove IE but EU/Opera did not agree. Why should they bear the cost so that Opera and others can get their browser can get on to people's PCs? That is just plain dumb.

- Using bundled FTP? will Opera like that? I am sure their bloat of a browser has FTP client bolted somewhere. How long before they complain about ftp?

- Users don't give a **** about what browsers are. They just want to use the internetz.

- How about Opera providing a ballot screen when Nintendo Wii boots for the first time? I believe it is the default and only browser on Wii, I may be wrong though ;)

Many people siding with Opera seem to have a personal vendetta against Microsoft for their "criminal monopolist behavior", why don't you guys walk the talk and throw every ****ing Microsoft software off your PCs? I mean if it is that big of matter of punishing a "criminal monopolist" then there is nothing better than to vote with your wallet and use alternate OSs/platforms.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Trailer park trash “sport “, fits the current White House
    • KataLib 5.3.0.0 by Razvan Serea KataLib is more than just a music player — it's a complete audio suite designed for music lovers and creators alike. It combines a powerful audio player, a flexible metadata editor, a capable audio converter, and a music library manager into one streamlined application. Core Features: Audio Player Enjoy seamless playback of virtually any audio format or even streaming video files. DJ Mode lets you mix tracks with manual or automatic crossfades. You can also load and save WinAmp-style playlists for quick access to your favorite sets. Audio Converter Convert between a wide range of audio formats effortlessly. Trim or normalize your output automatically, and even extract audio from streaming video sources. Ideal for preparing files for different devices or platforms. Metadata Editor View and edit ID3v2 tags and other metadata. Batch edit multiple files at once, and fetch missing information directly from the MusicBrainz database. You can also apply or update album art with ease. Music Library Manager Organize your entire audio collection, search across tracks instantly, and download cover images from the internet — or use your own custom artwork. KataLib makes it easy to keep your library tidy and enriched with useful info. Supported Formats: KataLib supports a wide range of both lossy and lossless audio formats: Input: OPUS, AAC, FLAC, M4A, MP3, MP4, MPC, APE, AIF, MKV, AVI, MOV, FLV, WEBM, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WAVPack, WMA, AC3, OGA, MP2, MPGA, MPEG, DTS, M4B, DSD (DFS) Output: OPUS, FLAC, M4A, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV Under the hood, KataLib uses the trusted FFmpeg engine for audio conversion and media playback, ensuring compatibility with virtually all mainstream media formats. KataLib 5.3.0.0 changelog: Added Option to select the Zoom level of the Oscilloscope visualizer. The taskbar button of the app now displays the progress of its processing tasks. The metadata text of the Visualization Video can now be aligned by the user. We can now reorder the order of the Visualizers and Metadata, in the Visualization Video Setup dialog, by removing any item and adding it again. It will be added at the end. Changed The font size of the Visualization Video can now be more than 30 points. Updated yt-dlp library to version 2026... Fixed Opening the Visualization Video Setup dialog could fail if the settings were wrong. Sometimes there were false duplicates in the Rename Tracks dialog. Tracks without metadata appeared without title in the Recent menu. Download: KataLib 5.3.0.0 | 90.0 MB (Open Source) Links: KataLib Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe EA’s UFC series of fighting games has been putting out games for over 10 years now, but it’s a series I have never spent any time with. As a PC guy, the series being console-exclusive is the primary reason for that. The latest entry to the series, EA Sports UFC 6, is still not coming to PC, but I have an Xbox now. When EA reached out to see if I could have a crack at the game and give my opinion about it, I finally got the chance to see what this franchise is about. I have spent about a week playing UFC 6 on the Xbox Series X. Despite my lackluster skill with fighting games, I still have fun with entries like Street Fighter and Tekken. I quickly came to realize this is a different kind of fighting game, not the arcade titles I am usually dabbling with. Most of the week that I spent playing UFC 6 was in the career mode, trying not to get knocked out while slowly improving my combos and reactions. The review below will be from the perspective of a newcomer to the series and an amateur fighting game fan, so please forgive any mistyped lingo or series-staple mechanics I am not comprehending. In the Ring Getting a solid hit in UFC 6 is satisfying. It’s probably the most satisfying impact reaction I have seen in a fighting game. The ripples in the muscles, the spray of sweat (and blood), the meaty sound, and the subsequent stumble all carry a lot of weight. If I miss a heavy swing like that, though, I already know that I'm in for a world of hurt from the incoming counters. The fighting is a real treat. The actions aren’t as snappy as arcade titles, so a miss feels like a much bigger mistake here. This slowness did take some getting used to, but I felt the improvement in my abilities even after a few drills with basic punch and kick combos. If I’m not deliberate with my actions in the ring, whether it be a hasty retreat or a flying punch, the possibility of getting instantly knocked out is always there. The head, chest, and legs all come with their own health bars, so guarding just one area is just asking for trouble. A few hits to the head, and it's game over. Meanwhile, you won’t even be able to stay on your feet if they get damaged enough, drastically lowering the total amount of stamina available for the rest of the match. I was also encountering a large range of fighting styles to customize my own fighter with. There are a huge number of real-life superstars here from multiple eras. It’s not as exaggerated as Street Fighter or Tekken, but the way they move, evade, throw punches, or even take steps is based on their real-life counterparts. I can see this being a big draw for any mixed martial arts fan. One feature I was surprised to see here was the 'Flow State' ability. As rounds progress, a power-up meter can give a temporary boost to the unique fighting style of the selected fighter, essentially boosting what they are good at. There is an entire visual effect that kicks in when activating this, too. The surprising part was seeing something like this in a game that feels like it’s aiming to be more of a simulator than an arcade fighter. My skill level is too low to use this exactly how the game wants me to, so I ended up triggering it whenever the opponent did it as well. Streamlined vs Authentic When I first started it up, UFC 6 asked me about my experience with the series. Being genuinely new, I took its advice and opted for a lowered difficulty level and 'Streamlined' controls. Quickly, I realized that this wasn’t for me. My chosen fighters were throwing random attacks, no matter what combination the game was trying to teach me. Win streaks were happening, and I was already getting bored out of my mind just a few matches in. Turning off this mode and switching to 'Authentic' controls fixed everything right up. I was now able to control my fighter with more precision than I expected. I could control each arm and leg, which body part my attacks would aim at, and the fully customizable controls for setting up unorthodox moves were a cherry on top. None of these made me an expert at the game, but at least I was being beaten up fairly. This is not a point against UFC 6, though. Giving the option for anyone to enjoy the game is always a good thing in my eyes. There is a lot of customizability in the difficulty, with everything from slow-motion reactions to specific assists being offered as toggles. If I had a friend coming over and wanted to try a quick 1v1, the streamlined controls option is one I’d consider to make it a light and fun fight. The one part of the fighting that did not click with me was the grappling. Being taken to the ground brings in an entirely new control mechanism involving mounts and submissions that feel more like quick-time events than the heavy, tactical fighting I had seen so far while standing. The game wants me to hold sticks in certain directions to change the position or pull off submissions, trying to do the opposite actions of the opponent. Even though I tried to get used to this gameplay, it just felt like a momentum killer, and I eventually just wanted to get back on my feet to get back into the action. Legacy and Career It was UFC 6’s career mode that I wanted to play the most when I started it up. I grew up with EA Sports games, and taking my team from the ground to the top has always been my favorite task. UFC 6 has that same option but also offers a more cinematic entrance to the career experience than I expected with ‘The Legacy’ mode. This mini-campaign follows an up-and-coming fighter, Chris Carter, who is attempting to reach the heights his father had reached in the sport. Starting with a small-time gym and coach, the story follows both his growth in the space as well as the growing rivalry with a friend and fighter, Danny Lopez. The fights in this mode are very good at introducing a newcomer like me to the sport and its varying techniques. Cinematics land between the major fights, showing the growing tension between the two fighters as the years go by, feeling the pressure to not miss out on the hard-earned chances. The dialogue can be a little corny at times, especially when the bar fights kick off, but I largely enjoyed the storyline. At the end of it, I was pretty much familiar with all the mechanics of the career mode, unlocking new skills and moves, and how I needed to approach fights, both outside and inside the ring. This story mode isn’t a very lengthy one, so don’t expect an hour-long campaign. Once the conclusion is reached, Carter’s journey continues as if it’s a normal career playthrough, though I decided to start over from scratch now that I have some know-how about the basics. The career mode is very streamlined, which is to be expected considering there isn’t a team to manage like in other EA Sports games. It’s the journey of one fighter. When a fight comes up in the calendar, I could choose how many weeks I dedicate to preparing for it at the gym. A longer prep time gives the opportunity to get my fighter’s fitness up (giving a bonus during fights), earn more money and points for unlocking new skills, and gain more fans to fast-track the rise to stardom. While that sounds like a lot of things to manage, it’s more like a few clicks. There is a social media menu that sometimes pops up with canned replies I can send to fans, and the sponsors are once again a single click away from being assigned as finished. It’s the training aspect that adds a gameplay angle. Using the money from winnings and sponsorships, I was hiring different types of trainers and learning fancier moves to use in the ring. One small thing I appreciated was that it was possible to injure each other during these training sessions. If a trainer goes down in a bad way while sparring, they won’t be available for the remainder of training. If my fighter is injured, it takes valuable time and resources to heal and recuperate. Just like in real life, it makes sense not to go so hard during training sessions and save that energy for the main event. Every training or sponsorship activity I took part in used up the days and weeks I had before the next fight, bringing a balancing element to the whole ordeal. There were times I simulated most of these to just get to the next fight, but the grind for gaining even the slightest bit of advantage while trying not to overdo it is an enjoyable one. Outside of quick fights and career modes, UFC 6 also introduces an almost museum-like mode to explore a trio of fighters considered to be legends of the sport: Max Holloway, Alex Pereira, and Zhang Weili. The aptly named Hall of Legends mode is unlike everything else seen in the game. Each of these fighters has entire levels dedicated to them that I could walk around in and explore their journey into the UFC. This includes footage from real-life fights and interviews about their original inspirations and training methods. Each of these spaces is almost like an interactive documentary. Once the highlights are done, the mode offers the opportunity to take over a deciding fight from the superstars. It’s an impressive transition. Going from the real-life televised event with crowds and commentary to immediately taking over in the game has some real hype behind it. Performance and visuals It’s clear to see that UFC 6 is going for a photo-realism look with its visuals compared to any other fighting game. The fighters don’t look great in selection screens. But inside the arenas, under the flood lights, surrounded by crowds, and facing an opponent, the visuals are more than impressive. As ghastly as it is to witness, things like blood spraying into the mat and muscles reddening as they get pummeled keep improving the immersion. The fluid animations help sell the illusion even further. A missed kick carries the momentum to require a corrective step. Hard punches that glance off blocks give off the air of a hit that still took some wind off the opponent’s guard. The special moves with flips and spins look mega awkward when missing, just as they do in real life. Suffice to say, the Frostbite Engine powering this game is one of the biggest strengths of EA development studios. Playing on the Xbox Series X, the 60 FPS gameplay did not miss the mark or cause any slowdowns that I could detect. I still wish this series were on PC to see just how far the developer can push the engine. One area I continue to have issues with, surprisingly enough, is the menus. The game has fast loading screens, but almost every menu I click through has a large amount of noticeable lag before it registers. This is immensely painful in the career mode, since I have to go through multiple menus between fights to train and do sponsorships, and having a 3-second pause when selecting a simple move between pages is the only time that made me quit the game. Thanks to Xbox’s quick resume, though, I was able to instantly jump back in the next day to the same point (and wade through more laggy menus). Conclusion My primary mission going into this EA Sports UFC 6 review as a newcomer to the series was to find out if this is a good jumping-in point for someone like me. Suffice it to say, the game passed that test with flying colors. Despite the high skill ceiling, the legacy mode introduction campaign, multiple types of accessible controls, and streamlined career had me picking up the basics and fighting styles much faster than I expected. I wish I had gotten to try out competitive multiplayer during my time with the game, too, but the lack of players in the pre-release version prevented this. The impressive visuals and animations, coupled with the impact physics that let me feel every punch and kick easily, made this the most immersive fighting game I have played. The only part that gave me pause was the grappling gameplay, which killed the momentum in most fights. The Flow State amplifying system didn’t hamper the experience, but I also felt like it made more sense for an arcade fighter, not this. Easily the most annoying thing about UFC 6 was its laggy menus, which I hope get some sort of fix later. Returning series veterans might have a completely different experience from me. But for a new fan like me looking to climb ranks and see fighters get floored in spectacular ways, UFC 6 doesn’t miss a step. EA Sports UFC 6 is releasing on June 19 across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. Ultimate Edition owners can already jump in via advanced access. This review was conducted on the Xbox Series X version of the game provided by EA.
    • No, Microsoft is obviously just spending money on maintaining a product with 0 users.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!