Opera Continues to differ with Microsoft


Recommended Posts

Maybe Microsoft should just ditch their browser. It has just given us headaches.

Confuse millions of users? Abandon support for thousands of corporate web applications? Break a multitude of Trident reliant applications?

Sounds like a smart plan to you?

Maybe the EU should make Microsoft put a ballot screen for OS's also, seeing as they are doing this. On new PC's boot up's they have to choose from Windows, Linux, or w/e else there is. :rolleyes:

EU should make a ballot about what commission should be policing competitive practises.

Users never got the chance to choose, because Microsoft used it's monopoly it has on the OS market to force IE on anyone who used Windows and even Mac (in 1997, see the first browser war). Users should have a chance choose which browser they want, based on features, speed or whatever browser was cool at the time, and if they choose IE that's fine at least they was given a choice.

A lot of people don't want to choose, though. They just want to bring their new Acer home, power it on and start browsing Facebook.

I know some 'non-techie' Mac owners who use Safari simply because it's the browser that was packaged with OS X. They either don't know about the alternatives, or don't care; they just use the default one.

If they used Ubuntu, they would most likely use Firefox (or whichever browser is set as default -- it's been a while since I used Ubuntu).

iPods are arguably the most popular MP3 players on the market. Should users be prompted to choose between iTunes, Songbird and MediaMonkey the first time they plug the iPod in their computer?

I agree that choice is generally good, but people just want computers that work 'out of the box.'

Many people siding with Opera seem to have a personal vendetta against Microsoft for their "criminal monopolist behavior", why don't you guys walk the talk and throw every ****ing Microsoft software off your PCs? I mean if it is that big of matter of punishing a "criminal monopolist" then there is nothing better than to vote with your wallet and use alternate OSs/platforms.

Why can't there be middle ground?

I'm not completely siding with either Opera or Microsoft. I do use Opera, but I do not have a vendetta against Microsoft either. I'm not seeing where all this outrage for a boycott and adding opera.com to blocklists is coming from...

At this point, realize that all sides seem to be cooperative. Opera, the EU, and Microsoft. Yes, what Opera is suggesting this time around may be a bit outlandish, but many here think they're still wholly dissatisfied with Microsoft's proposal - really?

At the end of the day, those of you who still choose Internet Explorer can still use it now and come Windows 7 general availability - no problem! What's the big deal here? It's not like browser marketshare numbers will suddenly start tilting in favour of one or two browsers once Windows 7 is widely released.

Why can't there be middle ground?

I'm not completely siding with either Opera or Microsoft. I do use Opera, but I do not have a vendetta against Microsoft either. I'm not seeing where all this outrage for a boycott and adding opera.com to blocklists is coming from...

At this point, realize that all sides seem to be cooperative. Opera, the EU, and Microsoft. Yes, what Opera is suggesting this time around may be a bit outlandish, but many here think they're still wholly dissatisfied with Microsoft's proposal - really?

At the end of the day, those of you who still choose Internet Explorer can still use it now and come Windows 7 general availability - no problem! What's the big deal here? It's not like browser marketshare numbers will suddenly start tilting in favour of one or two browsers once Windows 7 is widely released.

I think the bigger deal is the precendent this sets for other tech companies and US companies in general.

EU has been letting companies abuse the EU system for far too long against Microsoft. What I find the most ironic about the IE Bundling issue though is that this is a free product! All of this uproar and concen over marketshare over a free product. That is funny.

Now, I can understand the hate on IE6 and standards issue, but Microsoft addressed that with IE8. I say let Microsoft force update it, then that fixes the standard compliance issue. So then we are back to, this is a free product!

You guys can't deny Microsoft is using it OS market share to force the users to use IE. Microsoft knew what they was doing from the start they trick the users of Windows in thinking "Internet Explorer" was the only way to get on to the internet and it worked.

I can deny it. Before IE, I used Netscape. When IE was bundled, I quit using Netscape. I wasn't forced to use one over the other. Most people, IMO, at the time were using Netscape and then used what was included with the OS. If they had wanted another browser besides what came with the OS, then I would think they would have chosen to do so.

Say whatever you want, but Microsoft bundling IE with the OS is not forcing anything on anyone.

Netscape was snappier back in the day, but it looked uglier, web pages didn't render as well and had a tendency of crashing... Opera was a POS back in the day when you had to pay for it, I wouldnt mind using it now if they hadnt packed all that crap into it...

Fair enough you can say dont use it, but I dont want it there or in my sights :p

I want my browser to browse, utorrent for netbook isos/linux/bsd, thunderbird for mail.

Hence I use Internet explorer and Safari

A lot of people don't want to choose, though. They just want to bring their new Acer home, power it on and start browsing Facebook.

I know some 'non-techie' Mac owners who use Safari simply because it's the browser that was packaged with OS X. They either don't know about the alternatives, or don't care; they just use the default one.

If they used Ubuntu, they would most likely use Firefox (or whichever browser is set as default -- it's been a while since I used Ubuntu).

I agree that choice is generally good, but people just want computers that work 'out of the box.'

True, there are some people that don't want a choice or simply doesn't care. But there also some people that would be interested to know there other options, so would it hurt to add a screen when you first start the default browser, explaining what is a browser and saying there is other options out there? For the users who doesn't care they just need to close the screen and they will never see it again.

iPods are arguably the most popular MP3 players on the market. Should users be prompted to choose between iTunes, Songbird and MediaMonkey the first time they plug the iPod in their computer?

But when you plug in a iPod you don't need iTunes to access the iPod, iTunes is just another software you can download if you want it.

Why can't there be middle ground?

I'm not completely siding with either Opera or Microsoft. I do use Opera, but I do not have a vendetta against Microsoft either. I'm not seeing where all this outrage for a boycott and adding opera.com to blocklists is coming from...

At this point, realize that all sides seem to be cooperative. Opera, the EU, and Microsoft. Yes, what Opera is suggesting this time around may be a bit outlandish, but many here think they're still wholly dissatisfied with Microsoft's proposal - really?

At the end of the day, those of you who still choose Internet Explorer can still use it now and come Windows 7 general availability - no problem! What's the big deal here? It's not like browser marketshare numbers will suddenly start tilting in favour of one or two browsers once Windows 7 is widely released.

I agree, I have don't have vendetta against Microsoft, I am actually looking forward to Windows 7. I just don't agree with Microsoft current proposals, but it doesn't mean I have to stop using/buying Microsoft products. I also think its very silly to start boycotting Opera just you don't agree with one of their comments.

...free product!

Although browsers are free to the users, they create revenues for the creators. Opera, Firefox, IE and Chrome is ad-supported, Opera, Firefox and Chrome by Google and IE by Microsoft. So yes there is money involved, which is why EU is coming to the party.

Maybe Microsoft should just ditch their browser. It has just given us headaches.

Oh please. Microsoft has done nothing but improve many of their products recently. Suggesting that they should "ditch their browser" is not only a stupid business decision, it would hurt many other businesses and so forth that rely on IE.

Though, something tells me you're just looking to take a dig at Microsoft, correct? There are no shots being taken against Opera that they themselves haven't brought upon themselves. Honestly, I was a bit surprised to see that many Opera users were in complete disagreement with them. I mean, I'm aware that people have their own opinions, but I'm generally used to seeing a few people here ready to defend the company they favor. It seems Opera has probably lost those people as well.

Personally, as much as I began to dislike Opera's whining, I was still willing to test out their latest updates to Opera 10. Not anymore though. Probably the first time I've avoided software that didn't have to due with the actual software itself too. (not that I favored Opera all that well anyway, but I generally like to give updated applications a chance to win me over)

Edited by dead.cell
I agree with Opera, I have talk to a few people who isn't "geekly" and I know when they see IE or the IE's logo they don't think its a browser, they think it is the internet and because they think it's the internet they don't going looking for other options.

Remember this isn't just Opera, all other browsers including Google and Mozilla has join this as well, so for all you guys who are boycotting Opera, you should be boycotting Google and Mozilla as well.

So why don't you guys think about this first, before you fanboys go off and defend your company Microsoft.

Google and Mozilla agreed that there should be a change in how Microsoft implements Internet Explorer and quite happy with the ballot screen suggestion (one of the few options they had the first time round before MS decided to remove IE).

Let's not forget that Mozilla is making it's own inroads into the browser market, they have the experience, longer than that of Opera. Firefox is doing well market share wise and is continuing to grow. Internet Explorer has what now? 65%? And dropping quite fast. Google have just took on the competition, but they have it advertised all over Google, YouTube etc.

So let's face the facts. Firefox + Google have the marketing. Opera don't. Maybe Google should remove Chrome from all it's pages? Maybe Firefox shouldn't rely on it's huge community and advertisement with Google? Afterall, this is also effecting Opera's chance of gaining market share.

So at the end of the day, Opera are just bitching because they cannot get any of the market share. There is heavy competition, and it's loosing badly. Firefox and Chrome are doing well by themselves. Opera will not be happy unless Microsoft actually has it installed as default on Windows.

They are only in this for themselves and no one else.

But when you plug in a iPod you don't need iTunes to access the iPod, iTunes is just another software you can download if you want it.

Unforunately, that's not true. iTunes installs the iPod drivers, at least, I needed to install iTunes so I could access my iPhone.

At the end of the day, those of you who still choose Internet Explorer can still use it now and come Windows 7 general availability - no problem! What's the big deal here? It's not like browser marketshare numbers will suddenly start tilting in favour of one or two browsers once Windows 7 is widely released.

That's the problem, if Opera has it they're way, Internet Explorer won't come with Windows at all. The ballot screen is a perfectly reasonable suggestion, and it's doing more than what Microsoft need to do.

Firefox and Chrome are doing well by themselves. And Apple has Safari installed as default on their operating systems. And Linux mostly has Firefox installed on their distros. So it's a pointless battle.

Suggesting that they should "ditch their browser" is not only a stupid business decision, it would hurt many other businesses and so forth that rely on IE.

Isn't it a very stupid business decision to tie yourself to one company? Yet many have done that. Why do they have to rely on one browser, shouldn't there be standards which to rely on?

But with Microsoft, that doesn't happen. How is it a good thing, that I don't understand. Microsoft's actions only benefit Microsoft and due to its position, hurts all the others.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend_and_extinguish

a phrase that the U.S. Department of Justice found[3] was used internally by Microsoft[4] to describe its strategy for entering product categories involving widely used standards, extending those standards with proprietary capabilities, and then using those differences to disadvantage its competitors.

EU already had Microsoft make it so WMP is not installed by default I think? Notepad, paint, and calculator are next. Oh yeah, and explorer.exe, third party file managers need a chance to compete too.

They offered N editions without WMP, but they never sold very well, nor have the N editions of Vista. The truth is people really just don't care

But when you plug in a iPod you don't need iTunes to access the iPod, iTunes is just another software you can download if you want it.

Not quiet. You can use the iPod as a storage device with basic Windows drivers, but due to apple's lockdown over the iPod database, you can only use iTunes to sync it

WTHell?

From now on,

Opera=childish

Opera=stupid

FXXK OFF!! Opera

I hope Opera will disappear from our world soon........

Wow, what a wonderfully mature outlook

They offered N editions without WMP, but they never sold very well, nor have the N editions of Vista. The truth is people really just don't care

If people don't care, then why is Microsoft still forced to comply with such stupidity?

Oh wait, silly me. It's not about the people, it's about the EU/Opera.

opera just needs to shut the hell up. if their anti-competitive allegations against microsoft were true, then firefox wouldn't be so popular. Mozilla holds, what, ~30% of the browser market? they did it on their own, by creating good software, unlike opera.

When is Opera going to start going after Apple, or some other company?

When they finally come to the realization that they weren't failing because of Microsoft... They'll never accept that it's their fault, so they'll just redirect the blame to someone else...

We're failing because Firefox has a cute little fox icon and therefore has an advantage among people that like cute animals...

We're failing because Safari's gray user interface looks like iTunes and everyone likes that so they pick Safari...

We're failing because Google Chrome has "Google" in it and everyone thinks that they own the internet...

Etc., etc...

I'm getting so tired of hearing them whine. This is just so retarded... LOL It's laughable.

If people don't care, then why is Microsoft still forced to comply with such stupidity?

Oh wait, silly me. It's not about the people, it's about the EU/Opera.

More like it's about the EU and their love of money... ;)

Isn't it a very stupid business decision to tie yourself to one company? Yet many have done that. Why do they have to rely on one browser, shouldn't there be standards which to rely on?

But with Microsoft, that doesn't happen. How is it a good thing, that I don't understand. Microsoft's actions only benefit Microsoft and due to its position, hurts all the others.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend_and_extinguish

a phrase that the U.S. Department of Justice found[3] was used internally by Microsoft[4] to describe its strategy for entering product categories involving widely used standards, extending those standards with proprietary capabilities, and then using those differences to disadvantage its competitors.

I don't think you understand the average consumer when it comes to computers. They simply do not care about the browser. They just want to get on the internet. To them, they don't want choice because its confusing to them. The only difference they will see with Firefox and IE is how it looks. Later, if they try both of them, they may notice how they perform. However, if they are currently happy with their first click on the internet, then they won't care.

The EU's choices hurts businesses. Retail software should not be forced to showcase competing browsers. OEMs should make that determination by the licensing deals (money) that are made. That allows OEMs to make some money and sell cheaper computers.

  • 2 weeks later...
opera just needs to shut the hell up. if their anti-competitive allegations against microsoft were true, then firefox wouldn't be so popular.

Allow Mozilla to explain how Firefox is proof that Microsoft broke the market:

"When the only real competition comes from a not for profit open source organization that depends on volunteers for almost half of its work product and nearly all of its marketing and distribution, while more than half a dozen other "traditional" browser vendors with better than I.E. products have had near-zero success encroaching on Microsoft I.E.'s dominance, there's a demonstrable tilt to the playing field. That tilt comes with the distribution channel - default status for the OS bundled Web browser."

When they finally come to the realization that they weren't failing because of Microsoft... They'll never accept that it's their fault, so they'll just redirect the blame to someone else...

Failing? How can a profitable company with record growth and a large pile of cash on their hands be considered a "failure"? A company is there to make money. Opera is not only making money, but the desktop user base doubled in less than 2 years, and desktop revenue has grown more than 100% several quarters in a row now.

Also, Opera is currently the #3 browser worldwide. In Europe it's bigger than Safari and Chrome combined, and closing up on 10% market share. In some countries Opera has 30-50% market share. Funny definition of "failure"...

I'm getting so tired of hearing them whine.

What "whining" exactly? All I'm seeing here is a bunch of people lacking even a basic understanding of the case whining because Microsoft has to face the consequences of its violations.

I also wonder why you people aren't whining about Mozilla's "whining". I guess it's only bad if Opera does it, eh?

Gotta love hypocrisy.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Trailer park trash “sport “, fits the current White House
    • KataLib 5.3.0.0 by Razvan Serea KataLib is more than just a music player — it's a complete audio suite designed for music lovers and creators alike. It combines a powerful audio player, a flexible metadata editor, a capable audio converter, and a music library manager into one streamlined application. Core Features: Audio Player Enjoy seamless playback of virtually any audio format or even streaming video files. DJ Mode lets you mix tracks with manual or automatic crossfades. You can also load and save WinAmp-style playlists for quick access to your favorite sets. Audio Converter Convert between a wide range of audio formats effortlessly. Trim or normalize your output automatically, and even extract audio from streaming video sources. Ideal for preparing files for different devices or platforms. Metadata Editor View and edit ID3v2 tags and other metadata. Batch edit multiple files at once, and fetch missing information directly from the MusicBrainz database. You can also apply or update album art with ease. Music Library Manager Organize your entire audio collection, search across tracks instantly, and download cover images from the internet — or use your own custom artwork. KataLib makes it easy to keep your library tidy and enriched with useful info. Supported Formats: KataLib supports a wide range of both lossy and lossless audio formats: Input: OPUS, AAC, FLAC, M4A, MP3, MP4, MPC, APE, AIF, MKV, AVI, MOV, FLV, WEBM, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WAVPack, WMA, AC3, OGA, MP2, MPGA, MPEG, DTS, M4B, DSD (DFS) Output: OPUS, FLAC, M4A, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV Under the hood, KataLib uses the trusted FFmpeg engine for audio conversion and media playback, ensuring compatibility with virtually all mainstream media formats. KataLib 5.3.0.0 changelog: Added Option to select the Zoom level of the Oscilloscope visualizer. The taskbar button of the app now displays the progress of its processing tasks. The metadata text of the Visualization Video can now be aligned by the user. We can now reorder the order of the Visualizers and Metadata, in the Visualization Video Setup dialog, by removing any item and adding it again. It will be added at the end. Changed The font size of the Visualization Video can now be more than 30 points. Updated yt-dlp library to version 2026... Fixed Opening the Visualization Video Setup dialog could fail if the settings were wrong. Sometimes there were false duplicates in the Rename Tracks dialog. Tracks without metadata appeared without title in the Recent menu. Download: KataLib 5.3.0.0 | 90.0 MB (Open Source) Links: KataLib Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe EA’s UFC series of fighting games has been putting out games for over 10 years now, but it’s a series I have never spent any time with. As a PC guy, the series being console-exclusive is the primary reason for that. The latest entry to the series, EA Sports UFC 6, is still not coming to PC, but I have an Xbox now. When EA reached out to see if I could have a crack at the game and give my opinion about it, I finally got the chance to see what this franchise is about. I have spent about a week playing UFC 6 on the Xbox Series X. Despite my lackluster skill with fighting games, I still have fun with entries like Street Fighter and Tekken. I quickly came to realize this is a different kind of fighting game, not the arcade titles I am usually dabbling with. Most of the week that I spent playing UFC 6 was in the career mode, trying not to get knocked out while slowly improving my combos and reactions. The review below will be from the perspective of a newcomer to the series and an amateur fighting game fan, so please forgive any mistyped lingo or series-staple mechanics I am not comprehending. In the Ring Getting a solid hit in UFC 6 is satisfying. It’s probably the most satisfying impact reaction I have seen in a fighting game. The ripples in the muscles, the spray of sweat (and blood), the meaty sound, and the subsequent stumble all carry a lot of weight. If I miss a heavy swing like that, though, I already know that I'm in for a world of hurt from the incoming counters. The fighting is a real treat. The actions aren’t as snappy as arcade titles, so a miss feels like a much bigger mistake here. This slowness did take some getting used to, but I felt the improvement in my abilities even after a few drills with basic punch and kick combos. If I’m not deliberate with my actions in the ring, whether it be a hasty retreat or a flying punch, the possibility of getting instantly knocked out is always there. The head, chest, and legs all come with their own health bars, so guarding just one area is just asking for trouble. A few hits to the head, and it's game over. Meanwhile, you won’t even be able to stay on your feet if they get damaged enough, drastically lowering the total amount of stamina available for the rest of the match. I was also encountering a large range of fighting styles to customize my own fighter with. There are a huge number of real-life superstars here from multiple eras. It’s not as exaggerated as Street Fighter or Tekken, but the way they move, evade, throw punches, or even take steps is based on their real-life counterparts. I can see this being a big draw for any mixed martial arts fan. One feature I was surprised to see here was the 'Flow State' ability. As rounds progress, a power-up meter can give a temporary boost to the unique fighting style of the selected fighter, essentially boosting what they are good at. There is an entire visual effect that kicks in when activating this, too. The surprising part was seeing something like this in a game that feels like it’s aiming to be more of a simulator than an arcade fighter. My skill level is too low to use this exactly how the game wants me to, so I ended up triggering it whenever the opponent did it as well. Streamlined vs Authentic When I first started it up, UFC 6 asked me about my experience with the series. Being genuinely new, I took its advice and opted for a lowered difficulty level and 'Streamlined' controls. Quickly, I realized that this wasn’t for me. My chosen fighters were throwing random attacks, no matter what combination the game was trying to teach me. Win streaks were happening, and I was already getting bored out of my mind just a few matches in. Turning off this mode and switching to 'Authentic' controls fixed everything right up. I was now able to control my fighter with more precision than I expected. I could control each arm and leg, which body part my attacks would aim at, and the fully customizable controls for setting up unorthodox moves were a cherry on top. None of these made me an expert at the game, but at least I was being beaten up fairly. This is not a point against UFC 6, though. Giving the option for anyone to enjoy the game is always a good thing in my eyes. There is a lot of customizability in the difficulty, with everything from slow-motion reactions to specific assists being offered as toggles. If I had a friend coming over and wanted to try a quick 1v1, the streamlined controls option is one I’d consider to make it a light and fun fight. The one part of the fighting that did not click with me was the grappling. Being taken to the ground brings in an entirely new control mechanism involving mounts and submissions that feel more like quick-time events than the heavy, tactical fighting I had seen so far while standing. The game wants me to hold sticks in certain directions to change the position or pull off submissions, trying to do the opposite actions of the opponent. Even though I tried to get used to this gameplay, it just felt like a momentum killer, and I eventually just wanted to get back on my feet to get back into the action. Legacy and Career It was UFC 6’s career mode that I wanted to play the most when I started it up. I grew up with EA Sports games, and taking my team from the ground to the top has always been my favorite task. UFC 6 has that same option but also offers a more cinematic entrance to the career experience than I expected with ‘The Legacy’ mode. This mini-campaign follows an up-and-coming fighter, Chris Carter, who is attempting to reach the heights his father had reached in the sport. Starting with a small-time gym and coach, the story follows both his growth in the space as well as the growing rivalry with a friend and fighter, Danny Lopez. The fights in this mode are very good at introducing a newcomer like me to the sport and its varying techniques. Cinematics land between the major fights, showing the growing tension between the two fighters as the years go by, feeling the pressure to not miss out on the hard-earned chances. The dialogue can be a little corny at times, especially when the bar fights kick off, but I largely enjoyed the storyline. At the end of it, I was pretty much familiar with all the mechanics of the career mode, unlocking new skills and moves, and how I needed to approach fights, both outside and inside the ring. This story mode isn’t a very lengthy one, so don’t expect an hour-long campaign. Once the conclusion is reached, Carter’s journey continues as if it’s a normal career playthrough, though I decided to start over from scratch now that I have some know-how about the basics. The career mode is very streamlined, which is to be expected considering there isn’t a team to manage like in other EA Sports games. It’s the journey of one fighter. When a fight comes up in the calendar, I could choose how many weeks I dedicate to preparing for it at the gym. A longer prep time gives the opportunity to get my fighter’s fitness up (giving a bonus during fights), earn more money and points for unlocking new skills, and gain more fans to fast-track the rise to stardom. While that sounds like a lot of things to manage, it’s more like a few clicks. There is a social media menu that sometimes pops up with canned replies I can send to fans, and the sponsors are once again a single click away from being assigned as finished. It’s the training aspect that adds a gameplay angle. Using the money from winnings and sponsorships, I was hiring different types of trainers and learning fancier moves to use in the ring. One small thing I appreciated was that it was possible to injure each other during these training sessions. If a trainer goes down in a bad way while sparring, they won’t be available for the remainder of training. If my fighter is injured, it takes valuable time and resources to heal and recuperate. Just like in real life, it makes sense not to go so hard during training sessions and save that energy for the main event. Every training or sponsorship activity I took part in used up the days and weeks I had before the next fight, bringing a balancing element to the whole ordeal. There were times I simulated most of these to just get to the next fight, but the grind for gaining even the slightest bit of advantage while trying not to overdo it is an enjoyable one. Outside of quick fights and career modes, UFC 6 also introduces an almost museum-like mode to explore a trio of fighters considered to be legends of the sport: Max Holloway, Alex Pereira, and Zhang Weili. The aptly named Hall of Legends mode is unlike everything else seen in the game. Each of these fighters has entire levels dedicated to them that I could walk around in and explore their journey into the UFC. This includes footage from real-life fights and interviews about their original inspirations and training methods. Each of these spaces is almost like an interactive documentary. Once the highlights are done, the mode offers the opportunity to take over a deciding fight from the superstars. It’s an impressive transition. Going from the real-life televised event with crowds and commentary to immediately taking over in the game has some real hype behind it. Performance and visuals It’s clear to see that UFC 6 is going for a photo-realism look with its visuals compared to any other fighting game. The fighters don’t look great in selection screens. But inside the arenas, under the flood lights, surrounded by crowds, and facing an opponent, the visuals are more than impressive. As ghastly as it is to witness, things like blood spraying into the mat and muscles reddening as they get pummeled keep improving the immersion. The fluid animations help sell the illusion even further. A missed kick carries the momentum to require a corrective step. Hard punches that glance off blocks give off the air of a hit that still took some wind off the opponent’s guard. The special moves with flips and spins look mega awkward when missing, just as they do in real life. Suffice to say, the Frostbite Engine powering this game is one of the biggest strengths of EA development studios. Playing on the Xbox Series X, the 60 FPS gameplay did not miss the mark or cause any slowdowns that I could detect. I still wish this series were on PC to see just how far the developer can push the engine. One area I continue to have issues with, surprisingly enough, is the menus. The game has fast loading screens, but almost every menu I click through has a large amount of noticeable lag before it registers. This is immensely painful in the career mode, since I have to go through multiple menus between fights to train and do sponsorships, and having a 3-second pause when selecting a simple move between pages is the only time that made me quit the game. Thanks to Xbox’s quick resume, though, I was able to instantly jump back in the next day to the same point (and wade through more laggy menus). Conclusion My primary mission going into this EA Sports UFC 6 review as a newcomer to the series was to find out if this is a good jumping-in point for someone like me. Suffice it to say, the game passed that test with flying colors. Despite the high skill ceiling, the legacy mode introduction campaign, multiple types of accessible controls, and streamlined career had me picking up the basics and fighting styles much faster than I expected. I wish I had gotten to try out competitive multiplayer during my time with the game, too, but the lack of players in the pre-release version prevented this. The impressive visuals and animations, coupled with the impact physics that let me feel every punch and kick easily, made this the most immersive fighting game I have played. The only part that gave me pause was the grappling gameplay, which killed the momentum in most fights. The Flow State amplifying system didn’t hamper the experience, but I also felt like it made more sense for an arcade fighter, not this. Easily the most annoying thing about UFC 6 was its laggy menus, which I hope get some sort of fix later. Returning series veterans might have a completely different experience from me. But for a new fan like me looking to climb ranks and see fighters get floored in spectacular ways, UFC 6 doesn’t miss a step. EA Sports UFC 6 is releasing on June 19 across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. Ultimate Edition owners can already jump in via advanced access. This review was conducted on the Xbox Series X version of the game provided by EA.
    • No, Microsoft is obviously just spending money on maintaining a product with 0 users.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!