Xbox 360 now supports x264?


Recommended Posts

So I stumbled across something just now by accident. I used Windows 7 Media Center to share all of my video files on my Homegroup. After that, I setup Media Center to scan these folders and share them across the network. With this setup, I then went and added a Media Center Extender and input the 360's unique number.

I was watching some shows and saw an x264 file and said "**** it, worth a shot." To my amazement, the 360 started streaming it in HD and I watched it. I've tested other x264 files and they are working as well. :)

Now as far as I knew, the xbox 360 only supported h264. If anyone is on Windows 7 RTM, has a 360 and some HD x264 files, could you test and confirm?

These are MKV/x264 files.

Edited by Unrealistic
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/802950-xbox-360-now-supports-x264/
Share on other sites

x264 is a library for encoding h264. H.264 is the video codec/video format, x264 is a program to encode H.264 video format.

Basically, x264 is not a codec, h264 is the codec that is needed to support HD.

From Wiki itself

x264 is a free software library for encoding video streams into the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC format

The 360 has support for H264, I dunno about AVC, don't think it does that.

It doesn't support the mkv container though making it goddamn useless to me.

MKV is just a container, I don't know how many times on this board I've had to tell people it's codec support that matters not container :p Containers can be remuxed.

Right, but before today I have never been able to stream x264 files. It would say "unsupported codec".

Viper: I am streaming .MKV files. At least now I am with Windows 7 RTM MCE.

That's because Windows 7 actually knows how to stream to the 360.

The only limits I know are video bitrate

- H.264 video support: Up to 15 Mbps, Baseline, Main, and High (up to level 4.1) Profiles with 2 channel AAC LC and Main Profiles.

- Added MPEG-4 Part 2 video support: Up to 8 Mbps, Simple Profile with 2 channel AAC LC and Main Profiles.

And the 360 won't do 5.1 sound when streaming H264, at least not AC3 or DTS, only that WMA audio codec in 5.1. It will downmix AC3 5.1 to 2.0.

I will have to test that, because I could have sworn it was in AC3 5.1. Too lazy to test it atm though.

Just thought it was interesting though because before today I've never been able to play these files. I'd like to see if other people can confirm this though, because if it is not working for them, then I know what I installed to allow them to play.

MKV is just a container, I don't know how many times on this board I've had to tell people it's codec support that matters not container :p Containers can be remuxed.

That's because Windows 7 actually knows how to stream to the 360.

The only limits I know are video bitrate

And the 360 won't do 5.1 sound when streaming H264, at least not AC3 or DTS, only that WMV audio codec in 5.1. It will downmix AC3 5.1 to 2.0.

Did you not notice my post said "mkv CONTAINER" lol I am very (obviously) aware of the difference.

And even when I have files that are .mp4 or use software to put it into and mkv4 container it doesn't play at all on my xbox unless I stream it which is odd (for example playing off a usb doesn't work for h.264 at all) I have had some luck using xenonmkv to make it into a .mp4 and streaming with tversity though.

The h.264 support is really shoddy in general, for example it the xbox cant play h.264 files larger than 4 gigs, and can ONLY use 2 channel aac audio.

@Unrealistic what are you using to stream .mkv? tversity works but it tries to transcode it for some reason.

I will have to test that, because I could have sworn it was in AC3 5.1. Too lazy to test it atm though.

Just thought it was interesting though because before today I've never been able to play these files.

You should of asked for help before hand, I could've got you setup for streaming before now :p It's just Windows Vista wasn't made in mind for streaming HD content, you had to use 3rd party software.

It doesn't support the mkv container though making it goddamn useless to me.

Divx has a tech preview driver that gives access to mkv files for streaming. the only catch is you have to be using the 32bit win 7 as 64bit is not yet supported. I'v been using it since the Win 7 RC works pretty good. The only probles I have is 1080p is touch and go but it more than likely is my pc as its an old athlon 64 3500+ system.

Edit: Streaming through MC not through Dashboard

Did you not notice my post said "mkv CONTAINER" lol I am very (obviously) aware of the difference.

And even when I have files that are .mp4 or use software to put it into and mkv4 container it doesn't play at all on my xbox unless I stream it which is odd (for example playing off a usb doesn't work for h.264 at all) I have had some luck using xenonmkv to make it into a .mp4 and streaming with tversity though.

The h.264 support is really shoddy in general, for example it the xbox cant play h.264 files larger than 4 gigs, and can ONLY use 2 channel aac audio.

Well put it this way, MKV container support wouldn't really change anything.

The same limitations would be in place, as those limitations are due to codec & hardware support/compatibility, not container support.

Viper, can you test this? I was streaming a 6.56GB 720p x264 movie in mkv container. I'm just using the Media Center Extender to stream, no 3rd party software.

@Audioboxer, I didn't want to use TVersity or any other conversion software, even though my computer can clearly handle doing it. I'm odd with converting formats, even if they are mathematically similar.

Media center doesn't even recognize mkv files for me.

with the tech preview driver it will enable it give me acouple seconds and i will try to find the page for it

Viper, can you test this? I was streaming a 6.56GB 720p x264 movie in mkv container. I'm just using the Media Center Extender to stream, no 3rd party software.

@Audioboxer, I didn't want to use TVersity or any other conversion software, even though my computer can clearly handle doing it. I'm odd with converting formats, even if they are mathematically similar.

720p content shouldn't need converting/transcoding, just remuxing. It's 1080p content you'll have headaches with on a 360 for two reasons

- H.264 video support: Up to 15 Mbps, Baseline, Main, and High (up to level 4.1) Profiles with 2 channel AAC LC and Main Profiles.

- Added MPEG-4 Part 2 video support: Up to 8 Mbps, Simple Profile with 2 channel AAC LC and Main Profiles.

Some 1080p content exceeds those bitrates, AVC which is the second line is uncompressed so off a Blu Ray it will be 25-40Mbps. H264 encodes are typically around 10-15Mbps, but some go higher. 720p encodes won't exceed such rates.

Secondly many rips of films on the internet were done in profile 5.1 (scenesters fault, there was no reason to rip in 5.1, they were just uneducated about hardware support), this is a hardware limitation, the PS3 only does up to profile 4.1 as well, so those encodes need to be transcoded.

The Media Center Extender IIRC will transcode any content that needs to be, Windows 7 ships with the H264 codec so it can encode. This is the reason streaming from Windows 7 works out of the box, and Windows Vista didn't.

Yeah I can play mkv files by using a decent program called xenonmkv which simply transcodes the audio to 2 channel (no video transcoding) and puts it into the mp4 container, but the files it produces work perfectly streaming but not off of my usb drive.

The xbox likes to be really random though, I've had it refuse to play xvid files and I tried the same file 3 more times and it played. Its so goddamn touchy.

@ Unrealistic

If you have the MKV spitter installed it will work on the pc. if you install the divx it will allow streaming to the xbox as well. My son is watching Cars in 720p as we speak. lol

@ Viper

Thats the only problem. I had it MKV support under x64 but to get it working was way to much work and it was really hit and miss on steaming to the xbox. I ended up switching to 32bit and now it works perfectly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!