Recommended Posts

  Mephistopheles said:
In one word: No.

The TCP/IP patch was never needed; it's nothing more than a placebo.

/me waits for BudMan to see this thread

unfortunately you're way off there. The limit was introduced in vista and then removed in 7.

So no, no need for patch.

  ZombieFly said:
unfortunately you're way off there. The limit was introduced in vista and then removed in 7.

So no, no need for patch.

The limit was introduced in XP SP2. And you may be correct, I cant find any event in the event viewer related to the limit in windows7.

And while the patch was never needed, some weird combinations of devices, drivers and windows7 can really slow down torrents for no apparent reason.

  illwillnos said:
um, the tcp/ip patch made a HUGE difference for torrents from xp sp2 until vista sp2

if you think it was a placebo you're talking out of your ass

no, I have 6MB/s with and without the tcpip patch :rolleyes:

So it's useless.

  MagicAndre1981 said:
no, I have 6MB/s with and without the tcpip patch :rolleyes:

So it's useless.

In XP and Vista < SP2, the limit makes a significant difference, but not in overall speed. Eventually enough clients will connect and you'll get good speed, but it will take much longer with the connection limit. Also, while the torrent client is using up half-open connections, your web pages will take a while to load because the web requests have to wait for connections as well. The connection limit was always pointless (it makes no significant impact on the spread of viruses; there are a number of tech bloggers who have proven this). And Microsoft has acknowledged that it's pointless by removing the limit in Vista SP2 and Windows 7. Every time someone posts about the TCP half-open connection limit, I see the same idiots posting about how it doesn't affect torrents. But it does, and why the **** would people complain about how their torrents slowed to a crawl for a while with the limit in place, then be perfectly happy when the TCP limit patch from LVLLord came out?
  illwillnos said:
um, the tcp/ip patch made a HUGE difference for torrents from xp sp2 until vista sp2

if you think it was a placebo you're talking out of your ass

but yes, the patch is no longer needed if you're using windows 7

I used that patch on XP all the time, and never noticed any real speed difference at all. I agree that it was a placebo

Well, i had problems like that when i've installed Vista here for the first time (without SP). I wasn't able to update my Windows and access some sites, after a looooong search on google I've found there's some changes on Vista's MTU settings, I don't know about Windows 7, but hope it helps you. :)

http://www.annoyances.org/exec/forum/winvista/t1158155937

  illwillnos said:
um, the tcp/ip patch made a HUGE difference for torrents from xp sp2 until vista sp2

if you think it was a placebo you're talking out of your ass

but yes, the patch is no longer needed if you're using windows 7

It only seemed like it did. The only difference is the client can attempt to connect to more sources when the transfer starts. It doesn't affect the speed of the transfers a bit.

  xiphi said:
You are aware that there is no limit on 7, right?

post-175510-1248996129_thumb.png

I wouldn't be so sure about that...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4387539/firefox-money-investigating-the-bizarre-finances-of-mozilla
    • The Start menu in Windows 11 is the Start menu I dislike the most.
    • Apple's AI models still trail behind OpenAI's GPT-4o despite latest update by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2025, Apple announced several updates related to Apple Intelligence for both developers and consumers. With the new Foundation Models framework, developers can now bring AI experiences to their apps that work offline in a privacy-preserving way and are available free of charge. The Foundation Models framework is built on Apple’s own in-house-developed AI models. Apple also unveiled a new generation of language foundation models. According to Apple, these updated models are faster, more efficient, and offer improved tool use, better reasoning capabilities, multimodal support for image and text inputs, and support for 15 languages. Apple Intelligence includes two foundation models: A 3-billion-parameter model that runs on-device using Apple Silicon. A server-based mixture-of-experts model optimized for Private Cloud Compute. Apple noted that the on-device 3B language model is not designed to be a general-purpose chatbot. Instead, it is intended to perform text-related tasks such as summarization, entity extraction, text understanding, refinement, short dialogues, and creative content generation, among others. The big question is how well Apple’s models perform compared to other leading models on the market. Rather than using standard AI benchmarks, Apple shared results from its own internal evaluations of fundamental language and reasoning capabilities. According to Apple’s text-based evaluations, its on-device 3B model performs favorably against the slightly larger Qwen-2.5-3B and competitively against the larger Qwen-3-4B and Gemma-3-4B in English. Its server-based model performs slightly better than Llama-4-Scout but falls short compared to Qwen-3-235B and OpenAI’s proprietary GPT-4o. In evaluations involving image input, Apple’s on-device model outperforms InternVL and Qwen, and performs competitively against Gemma. While Apple’s server model beats Qwen-2.5-VL, it underperforms when compared to Llama-4-Scout and GPT-4o. These results highlight how far Apple still has to go in foundational AI capabilities. It seems Apple compared its models to GPT-4o to make its performance appear relatively decent. If Apple were to compare its results against OpenAI’s latest O-series models or Google’s Gemini 2.5 Pro, the gap would likely appear much wider. It will be interesting to see how Apple navigates the AI era with its in-house capabilities in the years ahead.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      IAMFLUXX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Æhund earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      CoolRaoul earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Kurotama earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      Carltonbar earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      497
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      268
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      229
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      199
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      151
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!