• 0

[c/c++] JPG to BMP conversion


Question

20 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Just in case you're doing it on Windows, here's an example of converting a jpeg to bmp:

#include <windows.h>
#include <gdiplus.h>

#define WINDOWS_LEAN_AND_MEAN
using namespace Gdiplus;

int GetEncoderClsid(const WCHAR* format, CLSID* pClsid)
{
	UINT  num = 0;		  // number of image encoders
	UINT  size = 0;		 // size of the image encoder array in bytes

	ImageCodecInfo* pImageCodecInfo = NULL;

	GetImageEncodersSize(&num, &size);
	if(size == 0)
		return -1;  // Failure

	pImageCodecInfo = (ImageCodecInfo*)(malloc(size));
	if(pImageCodecInfo == NULL)
		return -1;  // Failure

	GetImageEncoders(num, size, pImageCodecInfo);

	for(UINT j = 0; j < num; ++j)
	{
		if( wcscmp(pImageCodecInfo[j].MimeType, format) == 0 )
		{
			*pClsid = pImageCodecInfo[j].Clsid;
			free(pImageCodecInfo);
			return j;  // Success
		}
	}
	free(pImageCodecInfo);
	return -1;
}

int main(void){

	GdiplusStartupInput startupInput;
	ULONG_PTR token;
	GdiplusStartup(&token, &startupInput, NULL);
	Image testImg(L"c:\\test.jpg", false);
	CLSID clsid;
	int ret = -1;

	if(-1 != GetEncoderClsid(L"image/bmp", &clsid)){
		ret = testImg.Save(L"c:\\test.bmp", &clsid);
	}

	GdiplusShutdown(token);
	return ret;
}

  • 0

BMP is a Windows (and OS/2) format. The HBITMAP handle is very much a Windows-specific thing. Why do you want this to be cross-platform? And you do realize that, even for .bmp files, there are many different types of bitmaps, right? So... um, are you really sure you need/want this to be cross-platform?

  • 0
I would prefer not to use the Gdiplus namespace.

That's a really bad reason to reject this approach. First, you don't have to use that namespace. Or, you can squirrel all this away in a separate source file. Etc.

The alternative is to roll your own implementation (or copy some existing implementation), which is wasteful if you can avoid it by using a system library like GdiPlus or WIC (Vista or later).

  • 0

Gdiplus doesn't even work on my machine.

I don't have the header files and libraries with my compiler(mingw32-gcc).

I've tried CxImage,ipl98,DevIL, and a bunch of other Image Processing Libraries and none of them worked

(probably because they were coded with MS VC++ 6, and I'm using mingw)

BTW I want to convert a 24-bit JPG to a 24-bit bitmap

(another thing)

I already tried using a command-line image converter via system() but it didn't work.

  • 0

So it's not cross-platform you're after, it's cross-compiler...

If you're developing on Windows, you are going to need the Windows SDK no matter what compiler you use. And as a bonus, the SDK also contains a free copy of MSFT's own compiler that you can use (though mingw-gcc should work for GDI+).

GDI+ actually uses a regular, flat C API (which is definitely cross-compiler-safe), that is then wrapped in a bunch of C++ classes via the headers (which you get through the SDK) so that C++ users can pretend that GDI+ is C++. As a last resort, you can always just bypass the middleman and use GDI+ as any old set of flat C APIs.

  • 0

Funny, I was about to suggest CxImage, after my pleasant experience with it in a recent project. It compiles fine for me on both MinGW 3.4.5 (stable) and MinGW 4.4.0 (testing) (with the latest Win32API, of course.) I had to make some slight modifications, though, to get it to compile with libJPEG and libPNG. It should work like a charm for what you need.

  • 0
Well, actually it is cross-platform because unix/macosx have gcc.

If you intend to have your program run on *nix without Wine, then it's cross-platform, and you probably shouldn't use GDI+ (you still can, if you find an alternative method for your *nix builds) (note that BMP files are used much outside of Windows). If you intend your program to run only on Windows, then it's cross-compiler (even if the compiler can compile for other platforms).

  • 0
Funny, I was about to suggest CxImage, after my pleasant experience with it in a recent project. It compiles fine for me on both MinGW 3.4.5 (stable) and MinGW 4.4.0 (testing) (with the latest Win32API, of course.) I had to make some slight modifications, though, to get it to compile with libJPEG and libPNG. It should work like a charm for what you need.

Do you think you could send me a CxImage Makefile? Or tell me how to compile it.

Before I couldn't get it to compile.

If you intend to have your program run on *nix without Wine, then it's cross-platform, and you probably shouldn't use GDI+ (you still can, if you find an alternative method for your *nix builds) (note that BMP files are used much outside of Windows). If you intend your program to run only on Windows, then it's cross-compiler (even if the compiler can compile for other platforms).

Well, I'm developing this for both Ubuntu and Windows, maybe even Mac so...

  • 0
Useless code.

You can do it with 1 api call on Windows (Shell)...

So... Instead of you being an arrogant **** head, why not post the code and enlighten us? Jeezus, now I remember why I stopped posting here. I mostly code for the web these days, so forgive my ignorance of the shell that I haven't even looked at in years, O Mighty One!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!