[winxp] GUIDE: Making your windows folder smaller!


Recommended Posts

bolf_fortune ----> your link dont work

Sorry. Here you go. The first link below is about the overall slimming down of XP. The second link below is about individual system32 files which can be deleted. Again, these lists are two big to post here, so that is the reason for the links. Enjoy.

http://www.bit-quest.com/forums/index.php?...opic=1697&st=15

http://www.bit-quest.com/forums/index.php?...opic=1087&st=30

  • 3 weeks later...

in a hole afternoon, with XPlite Pro and Bold Fortune's guide, I got my winxp MCE folder (include directx 9.0b, WMP 9, PC-cillin 2k4...) reducing to 366M size on disk, is it worth to do? It'll take lot of time to know if it'll cause any problems!

What about disabling some services in WinXP - it should speed up things a bit :)

I've used the information put on this web site:

http://www.blackviper.com/WinXP/servicecfg.htm

to disable about 30% of services running on my wife's computer

(she has pretty slow computer - PIII 500MHz) and it seemed to work pretty well :)

VazaGothic, yes, disabling some unnecessary Services can help out with your system's performance. Seeing you post that here makes me think that you may be thinking that deleting some system files will improve performance also. Well, I wouldn't count on that too much. If you do see some improvement, great. I can't say I do really. If I do, it's more like...you know when after you've just finished washing and waxing your car? You sware to God it drives faster now. But I don't think it does. Deleting files for me is more of a hobby. I enjoy discovery the meanings and applications of files. But deleting files, for the most part, is just something to do.

dont mean to sound ignorant or anything, but say i have a big harddrive, whats the point making the win directory any smaller, surely if you are going to back it up by fitting it on a cd, wouldnt you need windows installed before you could restore, Please explain, lol :D

That's pretty simple. Say I have all my programs installed, all my settings made, all my updates current, and all on a 700MB CD backing it all up. Now, say I get mess up, or I get a virus, and it wipes out everything. Then I re-install Windows...and immediately install Drive Image 2000...then I pop in my backup image on the CD...copy it to another partition...and then replace my fresh install with that one. Get it now? See, I don't have to redo everything. It's already done.

There are other methods of backing up your system. All good. This is a method I thought up because I don't like the idea of creating boot disks and such. This is the backup system I use. I'm not suggesting it. It just works for me, as they say.

lunamonkey, that is usually related to deleting ".inf" files in C:\WINDOWS\inf. I do not reccomend deleting all the .inf files. What I do suggest is deleting the ".PNF" files ONLY. These are cache-type files which directly correspond to their .inf file. A good example of this is...delete all the .PNF files ONLY. Now, go to your Optional Components Manager, and search around and play around in their for awhile. Then reopen C:\WINDOWS\inf and notice all the .PNF files that were re-created. See, you need certain ".inf". If you delete them, some things aren't going to work.

C:\WINDOWS\inf

I deleted all .PNF files in this folder.

(PNF files, are cache-type files that will be re-created when and if their corresponding .inf file is called upon.

Per relder: It's a "pre-compiled" version of the ASCII .INF file that gets created when the Setup first processes a particular .INF file. It's done to speed up searches of the .INF files (as you've noticed there are LOTS of those on the system in Windows 2000/XP); if the dates of the .INF and .PNF files compare favorably (.PNF is later than .INF) the corresponding .PNF file will be used (if present).

If, and only after you give it some time, (say 30 days), a corresponding .PNF file is not re-created alongside the .INF file, it most-likely means you aren't using the .INF file. I go ahead and delete them. (What I do sometimes instead of waiting, is run through every application on my system and then delete (or save) all the .INF files that haven't created a corresponding .PNF file beside it.)

However, in the meanwhile, and I picked this tip up from NeoMayhem, who like me, is also is also into trimming down his XP installation: "Do a search for mdm*.* and delete everything that comes up. These are all modem drivers, and it is very unlikely you will ever need them because you either have a modem installed already, or if you do add one, it will come with newer drivers." I also delete the "mdminst.dll" (Modem Class Installer) from the system32 folder. It'll also come up with the search.

(Total Savings: 35.9MB, and 878 files )

Edited by Bold_Fortune
However, in the meanwhile, and I picked this tip up from someone who, like me, also is into trimming down his XP installation: Do a search for mdm*.* and delete everything that comes up. These are all modem drivers, and it is very unlikely you will ever need them because you either have a modem installed already, or if you do add one, it will come with newer drivers. I also delete the "mdminst.dll" (Modem Class Installer) from the system32 folder. It'll also come up with the search.

(Total Savings: 35.9MB, and 878 files )

I mentioned that in the guide, I picked up that mdm*.* tip from using 98lite a few years ago :p

Someone should make the guide and everyone's posts into a pdf that we can download to use offline.

Also, I am thinking of partitioning my harddrive just to put the pagefile on it. I have a 40gb harddrive and 512mbs of ram. How big should I make the partition?

You just have to see this. A guy named krazyzone has made a Bat file for my Individual System32 Files List. It backups up the files it is deleting to a folder to your root and then proceeds to delete the files. One click perfection. It's absolutely fantastic! I can't say enough good things about his efforts. I made a few modifications to his Bat file, and I am adding input as he goes along. He may go to work on my Slimming Down XP Files, (files outside of the System32 directory), too. People have been asking for this for the longest time. So praise to krazyzone for helping me in my efforts. Scroll down to near to the bottom of the page for the most updated Bat file.

http://www.bit-quest.com/forums/index.php?...opic=1087&st=45

I was toying for a couple of days last month, just now I see this thread.

I was able to slim down windows folder to 124 MB and to preserve stability and functionality.

All drivers, codecs, DX (also slimed down) are installed.

My machine is dedicated to video/audio editing, capturing, complete multimedial centre :)

And also, all other segments are functioning. Internet, gaming blahblah...

No BSOD, no errors...

Nice.

Cheers!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, mucking around with settings, maybe shoot some calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!