The worst movie you have seen?


Recommended Posts

"Beastly" came from Netflix a couple of days ago (I put almost everything in my queue, and most of my movies at the top are long/short wait), and I have to say, it's easily up there for worst storyline, next to Cabin Fever. It was just so insipidly stupid.

Blade Runner.

This movie is considered an absolute classic! I have the Directors Cut Version of this in my collection!

Avatar the Last Airbender.

Are you referring to "Avatar: The Last Airbender" or the two different movies "Avatar" and "The Last Airbender"?

Anyway I loved Avatar and "The Last Airbender" is possibly one of the worst I've ever seen, I did not make it further than 35min into the movie before turning it off!

Napoleon Dynamite

Thought that this was really funny, the one piece when he tries to jump the fence had me ****ing in my pants! As someone else put it: "..the scene where he throws the grapefruit at Uncle Rico then eats **** when he tries to jump the fence! lol"

Thought that this was really funny, the one piece when he tries to jump the fence had me ****ing in my pants! As someone else put it: "..the scene where he throws the grapefruit at Uncle Rico then eats **** when he tries to jump the fence! lol"

I love Napoleon Dynamite, but I appreciate that it's a cult classic. I can see why people wouldn't like it, it's certainly not a regular comedy. Same applies to Anchorman as well. Some people just don't get it, and to them it's a poor film, but to me it's one of the funniest things I've seen on film since Y2K.

I can think of a few porn titles, but that would be simply too easy. The same can be said of almost all horror films. I think it's a toss up between GI Joe or Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. I can fully understand why people who lived their childhood in the 70s and loved Star Wars felt when they saw the Phantom Menace. I couldn't understand it then, but I can now. I fell asleep in one of them, and got a really bad headache in the other.

The Human Centipede was pretty bad. I'm sure the second one will be just as stupid.

For the life of me I can't understand why they would even make a second.

I'm pretty good dealing with gore, but that movie just made me want to puke. Ugh. I would have to say that's the worst movie I've seen as well.

A lot of folks here are making themselves look like idiots or trolls. If it's not a B movie, you truly havent seen a really bad movie. One of the worst B movies I've seen was 'Silence of the Hams' It was extremely painful. Here's what wiki thinks:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_considered_the_worst

1 1950s

1.1 Glen or Glenda (1953)

1.2 Robot Monster (1953)

1.3 The Conqueror (1956)

1.4 Plan 9 from Outer Space (1959)

2 1960s

2.1 The Beast of Yucca Flats (1961)

2.2 Eegah (1962)

2.3 The Creeping Terror (1964)

2.4 Santa Claus Conquers the Martians (1964)

2.5 Monster A Go-Go (1965)

2.6 Manos: The Hands of Fate (1966)

3 1970s

3.1 Myra Breckinridge (1970)

4 1980s

4.1 Inchon (1982)

4.2 Howard the Duck (1986)

4.3 The Garbage Pail Kids Movie (1987)

4.4 Hobgoblins (1988)

4.5 Mac and Me (1988)

5 1990s

5.1 Troll 2 (1990)

5.2 Highlander II: The Quickening (1991)

5.3 North (1994)

5.4 Showgirls (1995)

5.5 An Alan Smithee Film Burn Hollywood Burn (1998)

6 2000s

6.1 Battlefield Earth (2000)

6.2 Freddy Got Fingered (2001)

6.3 From Justin to Kelly (2003)

6.4 The Room (2003)

6.5 Gigli (2003)

6.6 Catwoman (2004)

6.7 Alone in the Dark (2005)

6.8 Birdemic: Shock and Terror (2008)

7 See also

8 References

9 External links

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!