[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

I have seen about 3-4 adverts tonight from Sainburys offering the ?26 deal! I rang my local tescos and they said they wud b selling it at ?39.70 at midnight, im hoping that sainburys has good stock but a guy who works with me knows a guy who works there and apparently they got 4 copies on each platfor:s:s

Some stores will be "trial stores" they dont want to send a small store alot when they wont sell it, they will see how long after opening those 4 copies take to sell, the next day send a delivery of 8, see how they sell etc. Trial and error.

Tesco advert in the Mirror today confirms the same deal as earlier in the thread (i.e under 30 quid... but only if you buy another game in the top 20....) I somehow doubt that would change overnight, as it would completely defeat the point in advertising today :p

Omg, i'm loving this, as expected, got 3 Pro Perks now, level 20 now i think, I ran home off the school bus to get the box from my letter box :L, Parcelforce didn't make me sign for it either, so yeh :) Urm not tried Spec-Ops or Solo but I am enjoying MP, Party option is very annoying!

Omg, i'm loving this, as expected, got 3 Pro Perks now, level 20 now i think, I ran home off the school bus to get the box from my letter box :L, Parcelforce didn't make me sign for it either, so yeh :) Urm not tried Spec-Ops or Solo but I am enjoying MP, Party option is very annoying!

So how are the Pro perks, do they have a real effect or not? Things like Sleight of Hand Pro reducing time to aim down the sights (Good for me considering I aim a lot in CoD4, and this is usually the death of me).

Omg, i'm loving this, as expected, got 3 Pro Perks now, level 20 now i think, I ran home off the school bus to get the box from my letter box :L, Parcelforce didn't make me sign for it either, so yeh :) Urm not tried Spec-Ops or Solo but I am enjoying MP, Party option is very annoying!

I'm jealous of your sig! lol

Getting a bit bored of the respawn system. It consists of:

Respawn

Walk three feet

Get shot in the back

Respawn

Walk three feet

Die to pred missile

Respawn

Walk three feet

Die due to jet

This maybe unique to TDM though.

that doesnt sound fun at all! :(

btw screw all you haters ragging on the guy with his NVGs!

Got SoH Pro and Stopping Power Pro, taken down two UAV's one with SP Pro one with out, alot quicker second time round, urm SoH isn't noticeable.

Modern Warfare 2 Icon Pack - From my pre-order

http://marketplace.xbox.com/en-GB/games/of...00-000041560817

zomggg cant wait to get down to sainsburys at 8am tomorrow.

so syked even though i've played it on 360. Do want that awesome online play feeling. Havent felt it since I stopped playing CoD/Halo 3 about 6 months ago O.o

that doesnt sound fun at all! :(

I think it's a bit of an exaggeration. Most of the maps are well designed so that you can take cover under something when predator missiles, air strikes, choppers, jets and whatnot are called. Only reason you'll die that much is if you don't play it smart and keep running out in the open. Also, once you learn the maps it's a little easier to avoid dying that much.

I think it's a bit of an exaggeration. Most of the maps are well designed so that you can take cover under something when predator missiles, air strikes, choppers, jets and whatnot are called. Only reason you'll die that much is if you don't play it smart and keep running out in the open. Also, once you learn the maps it's a little easier to avoid dying that much.

I'm actually looking forward to picking up this game. But I'm still undecided as to what platform to plunge for, X360 or PC. PC is what I'll play more MP wise and what I feel most comfortable with (K+M), but X360 will probably have the larger user base.

I'm stuck. Even though I won't be picking it up for a long while. I just don't know what platform. I might go with the 360.

I think it's a bit of an exaggeration.

Come back to me once you've been on Wasteland. There is no overhead cover bar the middle of the map with bunkers which turn in to a shooting gallery with a 25% chance of surviving.

As a chopper gunner you can shoot the doorways, windows and still kill people. I know I've done it. They have a hell of a large splash range.

Come back to me once you've been on Wasteland. There is no overhead cover bar the middle of the map with bunkers which turn in to a shooting gallery with a 25% chance of surviving.

As a chopper gunner you can shoot the doorways, windows and still kill people. I know I've done it. They have a hell of a large splash range.

Yes I've played Wasteland. Notice I said most, not all.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!