[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

So very initial impressions, but split up about 4 hours today between a bit of SP and a bit of MP.

SP is intense. No other way to put it. Over the top action at it's finest. Story is a moot point in all regards, which honestly makes that whole airport sequence that much more in bad taste. No need for it. To over the top in my opinion, and I am all for 110% in support of free speech, etc. Just really not needed considering the story consists of no more than a mission briefing about what is about to be the most unrealistic action you can possibly experience. Meaning it is completely non-existent.

MP is intense. No other way to put it. Somehow they have made one of the more fast paced frenetic MP experiences that much more crazy. Lots of text flying around, icons flying around, names flying around. Just always something going on visually on top of the action. Very much a visceral experience. Despite how much more chaotic it is, it all somehow works. Probably because it really is just the same MP game we are know and love with the original Modern Warfare MP on steroids.

So it is more or less exactly what I expected it to be. A really great, fun video game experience, extremely solid and polished, with a story that is weak at best, but that fact is irrelevant as it does not need to be good since everything else is.

Still need to check out Spec Ops mode however unless something is tragically wrong with it I already know I am going to enjoy it a whole lot.

I'm all for great multiplayer games getting good scores, but it's funny watching how reviewers will absolutely gush over a game and say things like "ohhh but story doesn't matter in this case", then next review around absolutely destroy a game with a far better story than MW2 by holding it up to standards against the best movies around or something, just because it has a few flaws.

Massively hyped titles always seem to get free passes in the review world when it comes to certain things, scores don't need to be 6/7 out of 10, the game obviously excels at MP and deserves a good score, but reviewers passing over story like it flat out doesn't matter just because it's MW2 is annoying.

I'd rather they point out things how they are and give it a 9, instead of say "story is weak but who cares?". Also things like poor sound, again, not something to just jump over, even if you think it's worth 9 for MP alone.

So I do think it's quite strange you of all people think it's irrelevant that the story is weak Larry :p Especially after coming off of UC2. This game has different priorities, but if anyone should be able to also pack in an awesome SP campaign to an awesome MP component it should be someone like IW.

Massively hyped titles always seem to get free passes in the review world when it comes to certain things, scores don't need to be 6/7 out of 10, the game obviously excels at MP and deserves a good score, but reviewers passing over story like it flat out doesn't matter just because it's MW2 is annoying.

Poor story? What about the 5 hour long ****ing game? I use to think 10 hours was short!

That's the problems with reviews these days. They are a verbal blow job rather than a critical view of the game. I haven't even mentioned the amount of reviews that can be 'bought' by publishers via 'gifts' (hi Halo 3). It's no wonder the rest of the media don't take gaming seriously.

Poor story? What about the 5 hour long ****ing game? I use to think 10 hours was short!

That's the problems with reviews these days. They are a verbal ******* rather than a critical view of the game. I haven't even mentioned the amount of reviews that can be 'bought' by publishers via 'gifts' (hi Halo 3). It's no wonder the rest of the media don't take gaming seriously.

Well it definitely is a little short, FPS games historically are never the story KINGS of the gaming world, people adhere to that and therefore don't want a dragged out game. Aside from your Half Life/System Shock/Deus Ex and some other classics of course.

But when you get a short story AND a weak story... :/

However as I pointed out, IW have the financial backing, and their development team is obviously insanely skilled, if they have ******** writers, look for better ones or give the script to a 3rd party.

Of course when you sell 6 million copies day 1, it doesn't really seem to matter, hence reviewers also saying it doesn't matter, people are going to go bananas anyway. But I don't think that's the attitude to take, IW are in such a good position to create something worth absolutely blowing your balls off with a shotgun over all round.

I'm just fed up with crappy stories in FPS games. You end up having to wait for something like Bioshock 1/2 to get a decent story, but it obviously lacked MP in 1, in 2 it probably won't be of the calibre of something like MW.

I've even heard people saying MW2 campaign is slightly below MW1, and considering they had the MP backbone in place, but just polished it to hell and back and added lots of new goodies, that's a bit disappointing in 2 years.

Don't get me wrong, I'm excited as a kid like Christmas to get my copy tomorrow, but it annoys me reviewers can't write an objective 9/10 review, but have to just go gung-ho pretending like it's not worth mentioning the downsides, even if the upsides outweigh them. All that does is send a message to the developers not to really challenge themselves with SP... ever.

Oh and challenging yourself with SP doesn't mean adding that stupid terrorist level that totally seems to be done for the hell of it now with peoples opinions on the story as a whole.

Edited by Audioboxer
Wow camping is VERY prevelant in this game. I'm noticing it more than any other MP game I've played before. Usually I don't notice/care, but the camping in this is kind of irritating.

Not having played it yet, but poking around corners with a Semtex should do the trick ;)

Not having played it yet, but poking around corners with a Semtex should do the trick ;)

Followed by 6 stun grenades and auto shotty fire after that. Talking of the auto shotty I've noticed, in MP anyway, there is a range at about 50 yards where even if you're dead centre on your target you'll do 0 damage- lol wut?

Are you any good at MP on xbox Larry? Cause I am just knowing I am going to be HORRIBLE going from a mouse+keyboard to a controller

I am too. That's why I don't own a 360.

So has anyone beat the single player campaign yet?

Edited by Frylock86

Holy cow do I ever have buyers remorse after buying this title.

You can obviously tell Activison and Infinity Ward paid for the reviews there getting. This is no where near a solid game as they all claim. Campain is a meger 3hrs and is completely ridiculous, linear, and you have no options to do anything but what they tell you. Graphics are sub par. Multiplayer is unbalanced, small, and a lack of total players allowed when other games are at least at 32 players, if not more. Total disappointment.

Holy cow do I ever have buyers remorse after buying this title.

You can obviously tell Activison and Infinity Ward paid for the reviews there getting. This is no where near a solid game as they all claim. Campain is a meger 3hrs and is completely ridiculous, linear, and you have no options to do anything but what they tell you. Graphics are sub par. Multiplayer is unbalanced, small, and a lack of total players allowed when other games are at least at 32 players, if not more. Total disappointment.

Wow. To complete Campaign in 3hrs you either a) Completed it on Easy or b) Ignored most enemies and rushed through levels.

Videos of Multiplayer that I've seen (I can't really judge myself) seem to show a fairly balanced game. Also with the 32 players bit I presume you're talking PC version here? Remember that it has higher requirements than the first, so it may set itself at a lower setting to give similar peformance.

Personally I don't mind that it's limited to 18 players because then it doesn't turn into a 50 player mashup of spawnkilling/camping.

Holy cow do I ever have buyers remorse after buying this title.

You can obviously tell Activison and Infinity Ward paid for the reviews there getting. This is no where near a solid game as they all claim. Campain is a meger 3hrs and is completely ridiculous, linear, and you have no options to do anything but what they tell you. Graphics are sub par. Multiplayer is unbalanced, small, and a lack of total players allowed when other games are at least at 32 players, if not more. Total disappointment.

If you want a non-linear game get an RPG, not an FPS. The graphics are amazing but I will agree that they have mucked up the multiplayer with the low player limit.

Are you any good at MP on xbox Larry? Cause I am just knowing I am going to be HORRIBLE going from a mouse+keyboard to a controller

So I do think it's quite strange you of all people think it's irrelevant that the story is weak Larry :p Especially after coming off of UC2. This game has different priorities, but if anyone should be able to also pack in an awesome SP campaign to an awesome MP component it should be someone like IW.

But that's kinda my whole point though, a game like this does not even need a good story. It is a popcorn action game. The big summertime movie Blockbuster of video games. Just as most action adventure movies these days have **** poor stories, this game is no different. But it is okay because the over-the-top action is over-the-top enough to make it enjoyable.

And actually I have said a lot in my years here as a member with all of my little mini reviews and opinions I post on games, but I pretty much never cared about stories in games, as quite frankly I think they are all usually god awful and or I just do not care for the subject matter itself. I was born with Asteroids and Pitfall. What I mean by that is I could just be told you are an Italian Plumber looking for a princess is some crazy fantasy world with walking mushrooms and that is all the story I personally need. I like playing games for the act of playing games. In their evolution they have become a medium that also has the capability to entertain me with a story as well, so that to me is an added bonus, one however which I do not necessarily look forward to and / or need. And when I do look forward to a solid story more often than not I am disappointed. In fact the only FPS series I actually like the story line is Half Life. I dig the whole concept and execution. Sure, Bioshock had a decent story, and so did a few others (I especially loved the earlier COD's and Medal Of Honors because of their historical accuracy) but way more often then not I just enjoy shooting stuff in a new way more than I follow the story. Just how I approach games overall.

So Uncharted 2 was a rarity, it had a decent enough story for sure, but even with my little review on here I said how I thought the end of it was cheesy and stupid. So not really sure why you would be surprised by me saying the story being weak does not really have a factor on things, as I never really cared for stories all that much.

EDIT - But FTR, do I believe they should not get a pass from reviewers for having no story? Not at all, it should be pointed out, but like I said I think the reason it is not pointed out is because it is just damn fun to play.

Edited by DirtyLarry

YEAH! Finally out of stripes on MP and in to bars, rank 34! \o/

I've came to the conclusion that sniper rifles aren't for me, tempted to level the FAL to get a thermal scope on it though as I know that extends the zoom to ludicrous ranges.

Holy cow do I ever have buyers remorse after buying this title.

You can obviously tell Activison and Infinity Ward paid for the reviews there getting. This is no where near a solid game as they all claim. Campain is a meger 3hrs and is completely ridiculous, linear, and you have no options to do anything but what they tell you. Graphics are sub par. Multiplayer is unbalanced, small, and a lack of total players allowed when other games are at least at 32 players, if not more. Total disappointment.

Just curious... did you play Modern Warfare 1 or World at War? And if so, what did you think of them?

Holy cow do I ever have buyers remorse after buying this title.

You can obviously tell Activison and Infinity Ward paid for the reviews there getting. This is no where near a solid game as they all claim. Campain is a meger 3hrs and is completely ridiculous, linear, and you have no options to do anything but what they tell you. Graphics are sub par. Multiplayer is unbalanced, small, and a lack of total players allowed when other games are at least at 32 players, if not more. Total disappointment.

Because judging the length of the campaign based on the easiest difficulty is also the right benchmark for par. I'd like to see you beat the campaign on veteran in three hours.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!