[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

The other thing I think that really needs to be pointed out again is the lack of true 5.1 surround sound. For such a high-profile Triple A title, I seriously need to know WTF were they thinking and how can anyone release a game these days without 5.1. I just am dumbfounded by the lack of it. I truly am.

And I checked the back of the box, it indeed only says In-Game Dolby Digital, and my fancy new Onkyo Receiver I just purchased specifically for this game, well the little orange light that usually comes on when 5.1 (or higher) is enabled and being output comes on, and yep, no little light. I thought perhaps I had somehow changed a setting, but put in another game and light came on right away. My brother in law actually just called me as well bitching about it, his blue light on his receiver is not on either, and honestly I am just left scratching my head, and the sound really does get almost muddy when there is to much going on.

:iiam:

Why oh why did they have to botch the multiplayer part!?! Single Player campaign is just ****ing epic. I usually find single player in games mostly just a snorefest, but this is tight. I mean wow. Also you can see what they have inspired from in some places.. The Rock (I mean, the movie with NC) im looking at you. Graphics are quite ok as well. You can still tell its same old cod engine with touchups, but still thers lots to see.

Shepherd's script and voice actor are terrible.

Otherwise, being only 2 missions in, I have no complaints. Very fun so far thumbs_up.gif

Well, seemed fine to me. And voice acting in general so far seems perfect. For bad voice job go and see arma II :D

The other thing I think that really needs to be pointed out again is the lack of true 5.1 surround sound. For such a high-profile Triple A title, I seriously need to know WTF were they thinking and how can anyone release a game these days without 5.1. I just am dumbfounded by the lack of it. I truly am.

And I checked the back of the box, it indeed only says In-Game Dolby Digital, and my fancy new Onkyo Receiver I just purchased specifically for this game, well the little orange light that usually comes on when 5.1 (or higher) is enabled and being output comes on, and yep, no little light. I thought perhaps I had somehow changed a setting, but put in another game and light came on right away. My brother in law actually just called me as well bitching about it, his blue light on his receiver is not on either, and honestly I am just left scratching my head, and the sound really does get almost muddy when there is to much going on.

:iiam:

http://xbox360.ign.com/dor/objects/1428110...vdr_111009.html

IGN said good Audio in its review. :/

I've been playing multiplayer and decimating, i'm level 10 and have gotten all these weird titles and emblems. I haven't enjoyed the single player so far (i just can't seem to get into it) and multiplayer feels just like CoD 4, with some touch ups.

The other thing I think that really needs to be pointed out again is the lack of true 5.1 surround sound. For such a high-profile Triple A title, I seriously need to know WTF were they thinking and how can anyone release a game these days without 5.1. I just am dumbfounded by the lack of it. I truly am.

And I checked the back of the box, it indeed only says In-Game Dolby Digital, and my fancy new Onkyo Receiver I just purchased specifically for this game, well the little orange light that usually comes on when 5.1 (or higher) is enabled and being output comes on, and yep, no little light. I thought perhaps I had somehow changed a setting, but put in another game and light came on right away. My brother in law actually just called me as well bitching about it, his blue light on his receiver is not on either, and honestly I am just left scratching my head, and the sound really does get almost muddy when there is to much going on.

:iiam:

What is the difference between Dolby Digital and true 5.1 surround sound? My 3-4 year Onkyo receiver has Dolby digital, but I have never seen anything else come on when playing games on the 360.

What is the difference between Dolby Digital and true 5.1 surround sound? My 3-4 year Onkyo receiver has Dolby digital, but I have never seen anything else come on when playing games on the 360.

Dolby Digital is a codec... it doesn't necessarily have to be 5.1. You can have Dolby Digital with 2 channels.

You should check that in your Xbox 360 settings you have Dolby Digital 5.1 checked.

Unfortunately Xbox 360 doesn't have anything better than DD 5.1. So that's the best you'll get, regardless of HDMI existence.

What is the difference between Dolby Digital and true 5.1 surround sound? My 3-4 year Onkyo receiver has Dolby digital, but I have never seen anything else come on when playing games on the 360.

You know what, I think I was completely wrong, as I turned off my console and turned it on again and launched MW2 and now my 5.1 sound light is on.

Weird though, as like I said it happened to my brother in law as well. So never-mind, seems to be working.

I had just read some earlier comments in the thread that led me to believe it was disabled as well, so I was already fired up. LOL

And I believe I am on the very last mission of the SP campaign, but I really need to get to bed here, already stayed up past my normal time. Will complete it tomorrow for sure.

Dolby Digital is a codec... it doesn't necessarily have to be 5.1. You can have Dolby Digital with 2 channels.

You should check that in your Xbox 360 settings you have Dolby Digital 5.1 checked.

Unfortunately Xbox 360 doesn't have anything better than DD 5.1. So that's the best you'll get, regardless of HDMI existence.

Thanks for the explanation. I am still not sure if the game definitely does 5.1, but now it appears it may.

You know what, I think I was completely wrong, as I turned off my console and turned it on again and launched MW2 and now my 5.1 sound light is on.

Weird though, as like I said it happened to my brother in law as well. So never-mind, seems to be working.

I had just read some earlier comments in the thread that led me to believe it was disabled as well, so I was already fired up. LOL

And I believe I am on the very last mission of the SP campaign, but I really need to get to bed here, already stayed up past my normal time. Will complete it tomorrow for sure.

Thanks for the explanation. I am still not sure if the game definitely does 5.1, but now it appears it may.

hmm, still no center channel for voice, tho... but then again,

Shepherd's script and voice actor are terrible.

maybe thats not such a bad thing after all

Arg! I should just stop reading this thread and get back to studying. At a minimum I shouldn't touch the game until late Thursday night unless I want my grades to suffer. :p A huge test and report being due this week has to be the worst timing ever.

Although I did play for 20 minutes earlier today after I got it. Just enough time to run through the training course three times to get the achievement (under 30 seconds).

Anyone else getting malware messages from Chrome on the previous page of this thread?

The website at www.neowin.net contains elements from the site dl.dropbox.com, which appears to host malware ? software that can hurt your computer or otherwise operate without your consent. Just visiting a site that contains malware can infect your computer.

Anyone notice how the game jacket feels very cheap? :/ It has some weird shape cut off from both sides. When I was opening my mail, almost thought the disk has broken because it was flexing easily.

Although I did play for 20 minutes earlier today after I got it. Just enough time to run through the training course three times to get the achievement (under 30 seconds).

nice, oh! how I suck at this game. I never got the one in MW1 and even in this my best time is 50+ :D

Pretty fun - better than COD4 is my impression cause I like the co-op ability

mind you Co-OP isn't Story Co-op.. it's more like 'other features' co-op.

on that note.. anyone want to do some Spec-Ops with me? lol

Few missions into the SP and really enjoying it. Though it doesnt feel quite as special or 'new' as CoD4.

Tried some MP, and can see the huge potential there for it to be awesome, but the match-making system just really destroys it.

Oh, and what the hell happened to lean left and right?! Could you really not be bothered to add that in IW? Only notice how much I used it now it's gone.

Few missions into the SP and really enjoying it. Though it doesnt feel quite as special or 'new' as CoD4.

Tried some MP, and can see the huge potential there for it to be awesome, but the match-making system just really destroys it.

Oh, and what the hell happened to lean left and right?! Could you really not be bothered to add that in IW? Only notice how much I used it now it's gone.

Knowing activision probably implied it as cheating this time round and decided to go counter strike full body doorway/corner sweeping lol.

Coming from the PC, where I played almost all my FPS games including the first Modern warfare, I decided to buy the PS3 version (?26 a too good to give up, considering the limits on the PC version) .. anyway I was quite surprised how well I played considering this is myfirst> FPS game on a console. Yes I've played 3rd Person shooters (e.g. Uncharted 1 & 2) but FPS is a bit different. The controlling system is OK, I see that there is a bit of aim assists (playing on regular) I guess each level adjusts how much assist you get???

I do like the "rumble" from the control feels more immersive.

Only played the SP for about an 1hr or so and I jumped on MP for an hour and wasn't hammered:pp

Really enjoying it....and yes thats surprising as I thought...controller vs Mouse & Keyboard...surely M & KB wins! ... not really:pp

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!