[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

We should start a clan or at least have a few MP games for all of the PS3 owners on this thread - what do you guys think of that idea?
Hmm, PS3 online doesn't appear to be working today... :\

-Rich-

Always up for a PS3 match PSN: Pablo2008jedi
Awesome - add me too everyone

I would suggest making a topic in the Sony section, far easier for us PS3 gamers to arrange things without having to filter through other posts.

My PSN is CorrisD if anyone wants to add me.

Back to WoW for me then, I realised why I stopped playing on consoles in the first place.

1. The ****ty controls

2. Bendy bullets (lag compo is a game killer for me)

Shame I can't get a refund since I'm working at the store, I'll have to put it under pre-owned bah.

Part of me wants to buy the PC version, but the other part wants to not buy it at all. Seriously, how could the PC version be so crippled?

  • Lack of dedicated servers
  • Lack of 'console' for commands
  • Max player count of 18 (9v9)
  • Small but annoying pauses due to host migration (if a host rage-quits)

You can't even kick people in ranked matches. Honestly, that's just pathetic. I loved Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare so much that I basically told every gamer I knew to get it back in '07. Why? Well, it was an amazing game. Unfortunately, I can't say the same for its sequel. It's just full of cut-features that, for the most part, were present in a game that was released in '07. That's not all though. We're left with the icing on the cake: the game's price. Normally, new PC games are priced at $49.99 which is usually cheaper than their console counterparts. However, that simply isn't the case with Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. The PC version is priced at $59.99, just like the X360/PS3 versions.

Since when do you pay $59.99 for a PC game that isn't a Collector's or Limited Edition?

(Y)

Random nitpick: am I the only one that absolutely HATES it when developers just upscale the image on console games? (Modern Warfare games, Halo 3/ODST, Grand Theft Auto IV)... I mean, what's the point in even using antialiasing if you're just going to alias the image by using a smaller resolution and blowing it up?

lol there's like a 5 minute opening cinematic/whatever that you can't SKIP at all on any platform. Way to go IW!

... that's ****in awesome! Considering how cinematic this game feels its just perfect there. Thou maybe an option to skip it would be great i never even reached for intuitive space bar/esc/lmb.

Maybe I spoke too soon. I'm reconsidering after I got an AC130 + Harrier strike + chopper in a row, went from 8/8 to 35/8 in less than a min. :D

The AC130 is mos def overpowered though, I got a quad kill off the howitzer, their fault for grouping together granted but, it's like being able to fire multiple predator missiles at targets then being allowed to finish them off with a 50 cal.

Edited by Spookie

BTW: The "skippable" level is crap. I have no idea why that was included in the first place as it really adds almost nothing to the storyline (OK, a little, but come on). For once I actually have to side with the anti-game crowd in saying it's definitely tasteless.

BTW: The "skippable" level is crap. I have no idea why that was included in the first place as it really adds almost nothing to the storyline (OK, a little, but come on). For once I actually have to side with the anti-game crowd in saying it's definitely tasteless.

IW do a lot to put the image of gaming back 15 years don't they? Then again if you look at the official forums you see comments like: "but its only a game u *** they let us skip it".

Ugh. Just did The Pit in 28 seconds on my 3rd attempt on the PC. Still can't do it on the 360. Can we have a KB+M yet? Please?

Edit: **** YES! 29.9 seconds! *dances*

Edited by Spookie

How do you people finish the game in 4 hours.. I mean seriously?

I played on Veteran and it took me 9 hours and 12 minutes last night judging by Raptr site that tracks your gaming.

I think the game was an unbelievable ride. It's in every way better than MW1 technically and gameplay wise, unfortunately it is not as good in the story dept which was kind of a disappointment. Modern Warfare 1 had a very concise and clear story and I was actually much more emotionally connected to the game.

In MW2 I did have emotional moments but they were mostly like "Holy ****!" and kind of bad taste in your mouth type of deal, especially the US parts. MW2 is very very dark IMO.

But back to the story.. Did any of you who finished the game actually understood what the story was about. I seriously couldn't figure it out.

I mean it just felt all over the place and lacked connection. I mean it just felt they forcefully tried to connect the story from MW1 and then halfway through it's like they flipped the switch and story went somewhere completely different..

Overall though, the game was unbelievable from gameplay standpoint. I played for 9 hours without stopping how frantic and cinematic the experience is.

I especially liked the feel you get from the movie The Rock in that showers/breach scene.

Story wise, Uncharted 2 still holds the top spot in my book as the best storyline experience.

How do you people finish the game in 4 hours.. I mean seriously?

I played on Veteran and it took me 9 hours and 12 minutes last night judging by Raptr site that tracks your gaming.

I think the game was an unbelievable ride. It's in every way better than MW1 technically and gameplay wise, unfortunately it is not as good in the story dept which was kind of a disappointment. Modern Warfare 1 had a very concise and clear story and I was actually much more emotionally connected to the game.

In MW2 I did have emotional moments but they were mostly like "Holy ****!" and kind of bad taste in your mouth type of deal, especially the US parts. MW2 is very very dark IMO.

But back to the story.. Did any of you who finished the game actually understood what the story was about. I seriously couldn't figure it out.

I mean it just felt all over the place and lacked connection. I mean it just felt they forcefully tried to connect the story from MW1 and then halfway through it's like they flipped the switch and story went somewhere completely different..

Overall though, the game was unbelievable from gameplay standpoint. I played for 9 hours without stopping how frantic and cinematic the experience is.

I especially liked the feel you get from the movie The Rock in that showers/breach scene.

Story wise, Uncharted 2 still holds the top spot in my book as the best storyline experience.

Yeah, the story made absolutely no sense at all to me. I have no friggen clue what it's supposed to be about. You'd almost think it was originally a Japanese game that got a poor translation to English.

It kind of made sense to me...

Fighting the taliban (as we are today), then get chosen to go on a special operation that's undercover. Russians know I'm an american undercover dude, get shot and catpured / die? Think it was america pretty much starting a war. Terrorists sell ACS from a satelite to Russia, which they use to get into America undetected and kick ass. Then the american colonel / general? wants all the fame for himself as well as men under his command after having had his entire batallion lost (by the russians) so he thinks by doing this people will become extremely patriotic and sign up to join the US Army.

Pretty lax, I'm tired and can't fully remember but that was the jist I believe! :p

But back to the story.. Did any of you who finished the game actually understood what the story was about. I seriously couldn't figure it out.

I mean it just felt all over the place and lacked connection. I mean it just felt they forcefully tried to connect the story from MW1 and then halfway through it's like they flipped the switch and story went somewhere completely different..

I guess the idea was that Shepard hired Makarov (the hired 'mad dog') to shoot up the airport so he could start his little war with the Russians and get revenge for the nuke which was set off in the first game.

edit: Apparently not this is from the CoD Wiki:

However, General Shepherd betrays them and kills both Ghost and Roach. He intends to take advantage of the global crisis to turn himself into a global hero as well as write history how he sees fit.

That makes zero sense. :|

I really don't understand my self. Yet morons are declaring it's the best story they've seen in a game. It's no wonder we get lumped with turds when the majority think like that.

Christ. Even Die Hard 4 made more sense than this!

Yeah, the story made absolutely no sense at all to me. I have no friggen clue what it's supposed to be about. You'd almost think it was originally a Japanese game that got a poor translation to English.

Indeed that the story didn't quite make sense. They just throw in new characters and they do something to really impact the story then the whole thing changes perspective.

Well to all the people saying the story was ass and / or just did not make much sense, which I agree with 110% actually, all you need to do is watch this episode of the Bonus Round on Gametrailers.

IW more or less fully admits that the story takes a back seat, they say they create the levels and stuff and then piece them together based on pacing of the game-play, which to me reads as nothing at all to do with if they fit or make sense to the overall story.

So basically they have set pieces (their levels) that fit into an overall story arc (not a very tight one at that) and they use the mission briefings to try and make it make sense in the grand plot.

What I am talking about it right around the 5 minute mark. "We build the story around what would be fun to play."

Another great quote... "The Story takes hold and starts crystallizing toward the end of the project." (5:33 mark).

Just watch from 5 minutes to a little past the 6 minute mark and that more or less explains their approach to story telling.

Link To Bonus Round Video Above

Well to all the people saying the story was ass and / or just did not make much sense, which I agree with 110% actually, all you need to do is watch this episode of the Bonus Round on Gametrailers.

IW more or less fully admits that the story takes a back seat, they say they create the levels and stuff and then piece them together based on pacing of the game-play, which to me reads as nothing at all to do with if they fit or make sense to the overall story.

So basically they have set pieces (their levels) that fit into an overall story arc (not a very tight one at that) and they use the mission briefings to try and make it make sense in the grand plot.

What I am talking about it right around the 5 minute mark. "We build the story around what would be fun to play."

Another great quote... "The Story takes hold and starts crystallizing toward the end of the project." (5:33 mark).

Just watch from 5 minutes to a little past the 6 minute mark and that more or less explains their approach to story telling.

Link To Bonus Round Video Above

Interesting. I actually found the story in MW1 to be quite good. I wonder why the approach worked so well in the 1st one, and so poorly in the 2nd one.

Well to all the people saying the story was ass and / or just did not make much sense, which I agree with 110% actually, all you need to do is watch this episode of the Bonus Round on Gametrailers.

IW more or less fully admits that the story takes a back seat, they say they create the levels and stuff and then piece them together based on pacing of the game-play, which to me reads as nothing at all to do with if they fit or make sense to the overall story.

So basically they have set pieces (their levels) that fit into an overall story arc (not a very tight one at that) and they use the mission briefings to try and make it make sense in the grand plot.

What I am talking about it right around the 5 minute mark. "We build the story around what would be fun to play."

Another great quote... "The Story takes hold and starts crystallizing toward the end of the project." (5:33 mark).

Just watch from 5 minutes to a little past the 6 minute mark and that more or less explains their approach to story telling.

Link To Bonus Round Video Above

Yes.. the game EXACTLY feels that way. I mean don't get me wrong, it was ONE HELL OF A RIDE. It had me feel awful, it had me feel frantic and in the middle of the all out war. They've created experience that tops even Uncharted 2. But story just felt they made to follow the gameplay and not the other way around. This is where Naughty Dog for example has it NAILED. Uncharted 2 provided both great action and awesome story.

What's puzzling though is that IW is great at stories. That's why I'm dissapointed. Every single COD that came from them had a very emotional and great story. It felt each and every time as a great connected experience.

I can feel it even more maybe because I played again COD4 before MW2 and COD4 story is soooooo much better because it's connected well. It made sense and it kind of went smoothly. It was very well connected, even those scenes in COD4 when the choppers go down and you have to rescue them, even though it was not a part of the story it complimented the story so well. It made it more real.

Bottom line though is that I'm not dissapointed with MW2. It's great and in many ways A LOT better than COD4 but as far story goes (as Game Trailers and IGN review both say) the story took a back seat. It just felt that they didn't have a good writer or enough time to piece the story properly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!