[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

Glad to see other people getting it. I was like there's no way the game has sold 6 million copies and counting and so far and EVERYONE is level 25+ :laugh:

Heck there's always level 1~9 characters in games, even months later.

It's pretty poor IMO, not that beginner friendly. I mean it does try to balance in that I had like a level 30+ player, and two high teens, where as the other team were in like the low/mid 20's. However me at level 1 trying to combat level 20's with better weapons/perks ect is rather unfair.

Man up, son! MW1 was the same thing with dedicated servers on the PC, you play against EVERYONE. It only makes you better. :yes:

Played 3-4 hours MP yesterday and reached level 21

You dont unlock the hardcore modes until level 19 which is what I was aiming for

My god wtf have they done to this game? They certainly made more suitable for tacticool kids

Silencers on high caliber sniper rifles, light machine guns and ****in shotguns WTF!?

I enjoy the game very much but that is the dumbest **** I have ever seen

This is the average gun in MW2:

TactiCool.JPG

moar

http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&...l=1&start=0

yeah high power rifles using silenceres! that is fake as hell

oh wait

http://www.cheytac.com/MilChSniperRifleUTube.asp

shotgun

wish the silncers on the shotgun was bigger though. it is much to small

because they are not paying attention? no one is looking there way

Are you sure? Look again.

314xyfn.png

I am pretty sure they would be able to see them before they started to fire. Also, how do you get into an airport with those big ass weapons without being seen by people and/or security and/or security cameras?

they are not looking that way... you dont see things like that when you think you are in a safe environment.

I don't think so. They can EASILY see them with the corner of their eyes.

14l3ujl.png

They see them with the guns here and yet they still just look.

Its possible the people assumed they were security? The second they raise the guns everyone starts looking over at them and freaking out, before a shot is even fired.

I mean seriously, if you saw a few people in tactical vests with machine guns standing around calmly in an airport, what would your first thought be, security or terrorists?

Its possible the people assumed they were security? The second they raise the guns everyone starts looking over at them and freaking out, before a shot is even fired.

I mean seriously, if you saw a few people in tactical vests with machine guns standing around calmly in an airport, what would your first thought be, security or terrorists?

Terrorists. Secuity would be wearing the same things as each other, not random suits with tactical vests on like those guys. Secuirty would have the word Security on their vests or NSA, SWAT, CIA, FBI, TSA, etc.

Terrorists. Secuity would be wearing the same things as each other, not random suits with tactical vests on like those guys. Secuirty would have the word Security on their vests or NSA, SWAT, CIA, FBI, TSA, etc.

I think in that situation, people would give the benefit of the doubt or be in complete denial that they're about to die. It's the "that can't be real, this isn't happening" or "maybe if I don't make any sudden movements they won't shoot me" mentality. It's easy to analyze the situation behind your desk, but I think placed in it I'd probably **** my pants before I could run away.

Anyone else find that airport level kind of ****ed up? I mean, I'm not against them putting it into MW2 and they definitely warn the player about it... but it felt weird mowing down innocent civilians with a machine gun.

Weird or liberating?

:devil:

The entire purpose of the airport level is to show just how extreme your opponents are and the lengths they are willing to go through to achieve their goal. You being undercover trying to infiltrate the organization are essentially going through an initiation to be trusted.

You end up getting killed in the end when it becomes apparent that Makarov was just using you and knew you were an informant anyway.

The entire level is meant to show just how extreme the terrorists are. You have multiple screens when starting the game to decide whether you want to play that level or not. You are warned ahead of time. Even as the level starts you can tell wt is going to happen before it begins, you easily can stop playing and go into the options to change the setting and skip the level. It is in no way required to be played, there are no achievements that require you play that particular level.

The entire purpose of the airport level is to show just how extreme your opponents are and the lengths they are willing to go through to achieve their goal. You being undercover trying to infiltrate the organization are essentially going through an initiation to be trusted.

You end up getting killed in the end when it becomes apparent that Makarov was just using you and knew you were an informant anyway.

The entire level is meant to show just how extreme the terrorists are. You have multiple screens when starting the game to decide whether you want to play that level or not. You are warned ahead of time. Even as the level starts you can tell wt is going to happen before it begins, you easily can stop playing and go into the options to change the setting and skip the level. It is in no way required to be played, there are no achievements that require you play that particular level.

While I understand that is the purpose of the level, it still serves no purpose as the overall story is really not all that good and not really a story as much as it is a bunch of cool levels that they tried to make a story out of after the fact they designed the levels.

I already posted a link in this thread somewhere with a video with IW themselves outright admitting this fact (piecing the story to the levels), so while some may like the story, it is in my humble opinion poor, so to put something like this level to enhance the story is nothing but a bunch of BS to me.

They originally made this level cause they liked the idea of doing an Airport. Then they loved the idea of creating a level they knew would get people talking even more about the largest selling game of the year. I see zero artistic merit in this choice, but again that is just my opinion.

With that said, I played the game, enjoyed the hell out of playing the game, but my experience would not have been any better or any worse one way or the other if this level never existed. Actually scratch that, my experience very well may have been a bit more positive as I am here right now saying I think the level was done in poor taste.

Terrorists. Secuity would be wearing the same things as each other, not random suits with tactical vests on like those guys. Secuirty would have the word Security on their vests or NSA, SWAT, CIA, FBI, TSA, etc.

I some how doubt a single one of those would be on there vest

considering your in Russia in that mission. we also have no idea what is going on in the country at that time. so we do not know how they would react to seeing someone with a gun in the airport. after all the security was carrying TMP's.

but the storys for MW2 is starting to **** me off

[spoliers] I am sick of the main characters always dying off. I mean sure its fine to have some of them die. but it would have been cool to keep playing as the CIA agent.[/spolier]

I am glad they did the airport. its about time some devs grew a pair

Edited by mokthraka
Terrorists. Secuity would be wearing the same things as each other, not random suits with tactical vests on like those guys. Secuirty would have the word Security on their vests or NSA, SWAT, CIA, FBI, TSA, etc.
I think in that situation, people would give the benefit of the doubt or be in complete denial that they're about to die. It's the "that can't be real, this isn't happening" or "maybe if I don't make any sudden movements they won't shoot me" mentality. It's easy to analyze the situation behind your desk, but I think placed in it I'd probably **** my pants before I could run away.

Are you guys trying to get to the bottom of this massacre of AI civilians? :rofl:

Damn I still need to pick up this game, it's sucks when I see nearly everyone on my PSN list is playing it.

decent slowed down comparison video over @ EuroGamer.

It's an 360/ps3 comparison btw, cause everyone knows pc>all :D

o.O surely this has gotta be one of the first games where PS3 looks alot smoother and nicer than 360?

I played the Airport level and to be honest its not a big deal. Your put in the position and you have to do what you have to do.

Exactly. The media etc are portraying it as "You are a real terrorist" Not paying any attention to any other part of the story. Besides. They are pixels.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!