[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

^

Best thing I've done so far is get one of those missile drops and blow up a harrier right after the enemy spawned it :p I was like at first OH CRAP THE HARRIER IS RIGHT THERE BUT IT MIGHT NOT BE ALLOWED TO HIT IT, then just tried it and boom, harrier down.

But aye I was like WTF when I spawned one myself, just tore apart the enemy team in seconds, think I did wrack up more than 10 kills.

I didn't play too much COD4, but I do have to admit the multiplayer is like sugary candy on a kids birthday cake, it's just packed with a ton of crap/aids/perks/etc. I haven't decided if that's good or bad yet, I'm having fun, but as I said I didn't play too much COD4 to know how it compares.

Certainly won't be my GOTY, but I'm a SP > MP guy, so no matter how good it was with the MP, I still wouldn't have awarded it (some strong SP this year).

well i just finished the game.. and its 2 times more engaging then MW1 :)

i loved every bit of the campaign.. and well the ice rock thing is done by pressing right mouse button.. keep it pressed and press left mouse button.. now dun leave left mouse button and press right mouse button..

all the parts where it was a little scripted were AWESOMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

in all i can say the game was LEGEND---------------- wait for it ::::::::::::::::::::::::: DARYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!

oh and i havnt even played specops yet. :D

Someone's been watching far too much How I met your mother..... :p

I didn't play too much COD4, but I do have to admit the multiplayer is like sugary candy on a kids birthday cake, it's just packed with a ton of crap/aids/perks/etc. I haven't decided if that's good or bad yet, I'm having fun, but as I said I didn't play too much COD4 to know how it compares.

Oh no, I am having fun but think about it - How long will that cake keep you full and what happens when the sugar buzz wears off? ( Epic analogy! >.> ) right now, the only thing keeping me interested is hype and the 'freshness' of it all but all the downsides will hit very, very hard when the novelty wears off.

Gametrailers.com Invisible Walls segment just did an episode on MW2 to sum it up they said:

3/4 of them though MW1 SP was better, most appeared unsure on the MP citing it as having a learning curve akin to EVE Online and the Airport scene just put the industry back 10 years.

Yet it got a 9.5, funny how much power publishers have in this ****ty industry these days.

The MP has a learning curve similar to EVE? Are they actually serious? If they are, I'm never going to watch another GT video again, seriously.

:rolleyes:

Let me put that in context they said that there are people who have been playing MW1 for 2 years now and people who are completely green or only played the original for a short period of time will find them selfs staring at the killcam or hiding in buildings from attack choppers for 10-15 hours (their words) at the start.

Just completed the game a few minutes ago. I took my sweet time :p The single player campaign was amazing. It was just like the first one but everything was improved. The graphics, the animation, the level design. The entire game felt really well polished and I didn't come across a single bug throughout my entire play session. The multiplayer is um poor. But the single player is why I got it (Same reason I got the original).

Bring on MW3 (Y)

The MP experience is absolutely amazing, you haven't seen anything if you haven't played Ground War. I don't even want to complete the SP campaign because the MP is so addicting.

So far my favourite gun is the M4A1 with the red-eye sight thing. What level do you unlock the sniper type gun that sees infared, in other words sees the enemy with their body heat? I saw some guy using it online.

Got it this morning and I've only been on the SP. But gawd I'm crap. I keep dying although I'm on the easiest difficulty...Meh, this is the first COD game I've bought, but I'm really good at Battlefield, Uncharted and MGS4. ??

:rolleyes:

Let me put that in context they said that there are people who have been playing MW1 for 2 years now and people who are completely green or only played the original for a short period of time will find them selfs staring at the killcam or hiding in buildings from attack choppers for 10-15 hours (their words) at the start.

What games arent like that?

And COD is like the point&shoot of digital cameras :p

Americas Army, EVE, Armed Assault = DSLR

COD = Camera for kids

seriously though, if you have played FPS before COD will probably be the easiest of them all online :p

The MP experience is absolutely amazing, you haven't seen anything if you haven't played Ground War. I don't even want to complete the SP campaign because the MP is so addicting.

So far my favourite gun is the M4A1 with the red-eye sight thing. What level do you unlock the sniper type gun that sees infared, in other words sees the enemy with their body heat? I saw some guy using it online.

you can get that for most guns including the m4a1, its not very good on a m4 though there is too much scope wobble

The MP experience is absolutely amazing, you haven't seen anything if you haven't played Ground War. I don't even want to complete the SP campaign because the MP is so addicting.

So far my favourite gun is the M4A1 with the red-eye sight thing. What level do you unlock the sniper type gun that sees infared, in other words sees the enemy with their body heat? I saw some guy using it online.

You can get it any level for most assault guns (if not all, not sure), its one you can unlock, either find it through by going thorugh the barracks menu or go through create class, under attachment Thermal Scope will be greyed out, press F2 and it should tell you what you need to do, (I think its get 20 kills with silencer attached)

M4 is a great gun, but i find the Scar is a lot better, is more accurate, more damage is done, though the fire rate is less,

So far my favourite gun is the M4A1 with the red-eye sight thing. What level do you unlock the sniper type gun that sees infared, in other words sees the enemy with their body heat? I saw some guy using it online.

For my .50 cal it was 20 kills with an Acog. Yes Acog on sniper is ****ty as hell and it's so annoying to have to get kills for it. But getting the Thermal kicks ass, and add in FMJ (bling perk) and you can call it a day.

I found a way to soothe my frustration; stay the hell away from Hardcore mode in the PC version :laugh:

Hardcore was the only mode I played on the 360 but it's only enjoyable because of one single thing, the controller. Everyone is 'gimped' the same way, everyone has a slower reaction time and you get away with so much more. Here, there's no dear mommy - Been spotted and you will die instantly and if you by some miracle do get behind cover, someone is bound to path-predict and kill you. So went back to regular mode and enjoying it a bit again, it's like returning to kindergarten, the only 3 games I played back in regular had me sitting at 23 - 3, 29 - 4 and 25 - 0! ( Didn't have the nuke :'( )

agreed, i had to deal with the Acog/50 cal, but now i have thermal/fmj and love it.

For my .50 cal it was 20 kills with an Acog. Yes Acog on sniper is ****ty as hell and it's so annoying to have to get kills for it. But getting the Thermal kicks ass, and add in FMJ (bling perk) and you can call it a day.
lol

mw21.jpg

EDIT: And this knife throw is fracking epic :laugh:

Already posted a few pages back mate ;)

Also how many kills with what to unlock Shotgun attachment? Lulz

High sensitivity on the controller and lots of practice.

I did it already :D it was my second weapon slowing me down.. i didnt use a pistol for it but when i did u could see how much time it saves while reloading.

btw i play on the PC ... :)

but im nowhere good enough for multiplayer as i cant even end the game on regular :D lolx...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!