[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

Depends what you are looking for, "balanced oh we're having fun" matches makes me wanna puke - I want to be pitted against some hardcore mofos with 100 hours more experience than me - It's the best way to learn the games and get better. Then you also get pitted against people with no sense of anything, then you can annihilate them <3

The harrier is a massive pain in the arse, it's just way too overpowered. I swear it always hits me when I'm indoors too. Perhaps I just need to give the game some more time (and get better), but it doesn't feel as balanced or fun online as MW at the moment.

Depends what you are looking for, "balanced oh we're having fun" matches makes me wanna puke - I want to be pitted against some hardcore mofos with 100 hours more experience than me - It's the best way to learn the games and get better. Then you also get pitted against people with no sense of anything, then you can annihilate them <3

It's a team game, balanced matches work better for team play. Unless you want round overs within minutes.

Unless you're playing solo or plain deathmatch, you can't win a game for your team on your own (all that often).

I have no idea what game modes you're playing, but the bomb detonation modes or holding the flags are not that fun when it's a team of noobs vs seasoned players. I can't say the matchmaking always arses up, just sometimes.

Guess it's different tastes in fun for us, I don't enjoy it when your team can't do jack, nor do I enjoy it when the opposition can't do jack. I always enjoy a well fought/close battle. That's more fun for me, I don't really care about scoreboards or pwning people :p

The harrier is a massive pain in the arse, it's just way too overpowered. I swear it always hits me when I'm indoors too. Perhaps I just need to give the game some more time (and get better), but it doesn't feel as balanced or fun online as MW at the moment.

The harrier does indeed suck on certain maps. Too much "aimbot" in it, it spots you when you're out in the open for a mere second between cover and basically 1 hit kills you :p

Those with lots of cover/levels it's not as bad.

I'm playing Hardcore TDM and S&D - Both modes are extremely easy to dominate as a single player and it's possibly to turn the tide easily. Yes, it's a game featuring possible great team work but like any other game out there, teamwork is an unknown factor on public servers, it rarely ever happens - So might as well get used to playing lone wolf from the start and keep the teamwork to where it belongs, in parties with mates, not randoms.

I'm playing Hardcore TDM and S&D - Both modes are extremely easy to dominate as a single player and it's possibly to turn the tide easily. Yes, it's a game featuring possible great team work but like any other game out there, teamwork is an unknown factor on public servers, it rarely ever happens - So might as well get used to playing lone wolf from the start and keep the teamwork to where it belongs, in parties with mates, not randoms.

Are they the 'one hit' kill modes?

Something more like counterstrike would probably be better for me in MW2.

In broad strokes, yes and without a HUD and all this shabang. I hate this crap about having to empty half a clip into people - Hardcore matches are slowed down significantly, you rarely see people rushing around like CS kids in hardcore matches. ( I don't at least ) So it's a lot more tactical this mode and frustrating if you aren't very good at the game :p

I'm looking forward to playing some hardcore MW2. It was always my favourite way to play MW. Need to rank up and unlock all the game modes first though. I'm only level 15 at the moment. Admittedly I've not been putting in the hours though.

:cool:

Just had my best game - 19k, 3d and I also managed to get my highest score in one game 6.5k XP.

I also got to fly the AC130...until someone killed me :angry:

Surely you stay in the AC130 and just get respawned after it ends? That's what happens with Chopper Gunner anyways.

Surely you stay in the AC130 and just get respawned after it ends? That's what happens with Chopper Gunner anyways.

Nope, you go prone and open your lappy. I didn't choose that great a hiding spot, tbf - hid behind a pickup behind a water-pump warehouse in Underpass :p

Someone lobbed a grenade and blew up the pickup and me :(

Nope, you go prone and open your lappy. I didn't choose that great a hiding spot, tbf - hid behind a pickup behind a water-pump warehouse in Underpass :p

Someone lobbed a grenade and blew up the pickup and me :(

No that's not what I mean, I know you open the laptop. If you die whilst in the AC130 do you stay in, yet when you go out you are back in a spawn zone or something.

Nope, the default is perfect for me. I think the more you play around with those settings, the longer you're ultimately going to be fighting with the game and controlling. Whereas if you just stick with settings you'll get better at them with practise.

That said, some FPS' really have slow turning, so it's necessary sometimes. Strangely MW2 was just perfect for me.

Ok any tips on how to NOT suck at FPS on Console :p question about sensitivity, has anyone changed their sensitivity.

Ya. You can go in and choose custom. I play on 6 atm which is higher than default setting of high. You can all the way up to 10, which should be near keyboard/mouse IMO. Hope you have better luck at it than I. I kept over moving and missing dudes rather than quickly killing 'em.

No it doesn't, you just suck with it :p Loads of people are using Cold Blooded so they don't even show up on Thermal - ACOG gives you a clear, unobstructed view of everything around you and I've never had that many problems spotting enemies. Plus, certain areas light up like Christmas trees in Thermal, allowing snipers to hide in there - So I'll rely on my own eyes to pick out the target.

out the target.

ACOG + .50 + Silencer is a mean combo, deadly at range, deadly close-up :cool:

I read your other posts and saw you said you play Hardcore only. If that's the case I'll stop talking. I haven't played Hardcore yet and don't plan on it till I have better unlocks. I'm assuming like in COD4, Hardcore is a different game so different things may work there. I just know playing in regular TDX (Team Deathmatch Express) that Acog is horrible. I have no problems spotting people in and out of thermal, but thermal just makes it so ridiculously easy, it's funnay.

I hear what you say 100%. You know how I was with the original MW and this just feels different. In my last big post in this thread I talked a lot about the great balancing they have done and how I just can't go off and have 6+ games in a row where I do phenomenal.

After reading your approach, I realize some of that is my play style hasn't fully switched over yet. No matter what people say, with the original MW, you could run and gun ALL THE TIME. I tried to do that for my first 20 matches or so with MW2 and couldn't figure out why I was doing so poorly. Now I know that it is just how the game has changed. With everything being more balanced, you can't count on running straight at an enemy base expecting to mow down people left and right.

I'm starting to get better and playing a little bit "slower" but I still digress. You can still rountinely find me starting a match going 0 kills and 4 deaths or 1 kill and 5 deaths before remembering to take a deep breath and "cool it" :p . I always end up turning the match around and staying well above positive, but it just goes to show that although MW2 seems just the same to many people, it is a whole new ballgame in terms of play style for many people.

Audio: About the harrier, does anybody you play with shoot it down? Unlike the last game, you get a ton of points for shooting down the harriers, choppers, etc. Grab a rocket launcher or stinger and fire away. On another point, that is weird that you are getting teamed up with so many high levels that often. What game types are you playing? Maybe it is just different on the 360 with more people playing which probably averages out to a lower level in the mean time at least.

(Y) Good to hear someone relates to what I was saying, especially you as I know you know your stuff.

Today I literally had my best day yet, went 20-2, 16-5 and 14-5 in that order, and was top score in all 3 matches, team deathmatch and my team always won.

Then I decide why not try out the Red Dot site, and I went 1-16. Absolutely awful and I removed it immediately after that match. I am much better with just the iron sites. I guess I will just not be unlocking those challenges from using the red dot. But was really happy by the fact I had a few consistent rounds. My K/D ratio was at .54 when I started and in just about 4 or 5 rounds I got it to .78 (was .80 before that 1-16 round). So slowly getting better thanks to not freaking out as much is the easiest way to put it. LOL

@ SMELTN. Really just takes practice man, but I promise one day (and that day should be fairly soon) you will just get it. Practice that right stick as much as possible. And actually I usually go ahead and play with the controller settings a bit, but the default on MW2 feel literally perfect to me, I did not even bring the menu up.

And I had and still do not have a single clue what I was supposed to do in the musuem, and I searched everywhere. So where is this stupid button I missed? :laugh:

I dunno how people keep such low death scores.

I seem to be dead more than I'm alive :laugh: I'm not a bad player (can I find my overall stats anywhere?) I just seem to have absolutely horrible luck. Always seem to turn the wrong corner, turn my back at the wrong second, be the 1 guy picked off out the group of 3, etc etc :laugh:

Sucks :(

I guess a good bit of it is still to do with learning the maps, seeing as I'm probably screwing up around camping hotspots or losing out to enemies taking shortcuts.

Is there a recoil perk or something? Sometimes in death cam it seems like the enemy player who's killed me literally has absolutely no recoil. That's even on some of the large machine guns at times.

What's some recommended setups for someone at level 20? I've been going with a silencer for a few levels now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!