[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

So I'm back from Uni for the weekend, and that means it's finally time for a bit of MW2!

Now, I've only played about 1hr30 of the SP and about 30min of the MP and I can't see that the appeal is going to last. Once I complete the SP and go back through it for the intel (I'm a bit of a trophy ######), I think that other games will steal its thunder (eg. Uncharted 2, Assassins Creed 2, etc).

Doubt I'll be able to finish the SP this weekend either, so it'll be another 3 weeks until I break up properly for Christmas before I can polish that off.

I'm glad I payed ?26 for it rather than ?40 or whatever, I'd be very dissapointed with what I got if I had.

The ping situation for the pc is a bit annoying, as whoever hosting (as long as they're good) are always at the top and extremely hard to win a knief v knief situation. Its kinda depressin watching it find a game as well, cycling through the differents pings <50ms nope, <70ms nope, <100ms nope <150ms nope, <200ms yes found a server for you lol. I just hope they do improve it soon a base it on proper location, but majority of players on the server are in the same situation so cnt complain too much.

Btw anyone notice lag on SpecOps, a few times me and my mate play it gets very jumpy/laggy in parts even if both of us have 30-60ms pings, which makes me think something up with IWnet???

Btw anyone notice lag on SpecOps, a few times me and my mate play it gets very jumpy/laggy in parts even if both of us have 30-60ms pings, which makes me think something up with IWnet???

Tried it, once, friend connected to me who was also on Be*. Got a ping of 40 and a tonne of rubber banding. :/

Still not completed the forced co-op missions! :s

Edit: ROFLLOLSPELLINZ.

Edited by Spookie

For some reason I've had really bad luck today with hosts having really crappy bandwidth, on the 360. I kept having to quit the match because I couldn't even move, then my char would just start warping around the map. The switching hosts thing doesn't really work that well in this case, because it usually just drops you out of the game saying the connection to host was lost.

When it does the host migration thing, that it does quite often on the PS3 with me, it usually picks me as the host and all is well then, and everyone seems to have a pretty good ping to me.

For some reason I've had really bad luck today with hosts having really crappy bandwidth, on the 360. I kept having to quit the match because I couldn't even move, then my char would just start warping around the map. The switching hosts thing doesn't really work that well in this case, because it usually just drops you out of the game saying the connection to host was lost.

Join the club. :>

When it does the host migration thing, that it does quite often on the PS3 with me, it usually picks me as the host and all is well then, and everyone seems to have a pretty good ping to me.

Aye, that's the thing. Why the hell doesn't it choose us with the better connections and uploads first? Why does it always pick the same host as long as they are still connected? It should reassess the host before leaving the lobby. Too busy rushing the game out the door to improve the netcode! ;/

Aye, that's the thing. Why the hell doesn't it choose us with the better connections and uploads first? Why does it always pick the same host as long as they are still connected? It should reassess the host before leaving the lobby. Too busy rushing the game out the door to improve the netcode! ;/

That's what I thought. I don't exactly have the best speeds in the world, but I'm better than most of the people on there. Some of the games I've had are just so damn laggy, yet it doesn't try to find another host. ?? Ah well, I think I'm only going to play it with my friends now anyway, and I'll be the host because even they have crap connections.

Had all sorts of issues last night and today trying to get games started. It seemed at first it was any time we invited a new person into the party it would screw up. We'd always have to back out and re-search.

But today it's x10 worse. We have to back in and out multiple times before we can stay together, and then even when we did, people kept being kicked from the XBL party chat :confused:

Had all sorts of issues last night and today trying to get games started. It seemed at first it was any time we invited a new person into the party it would screw up. We'd always have to back out and re-search.

But today it's x10 worse. We have to back in and out multiple times before we can stay together, and then even when we did, people kept being kicked from the XBL party chat :confused:

You can't do party chat with MW2!

Yeah like Chris said, there is certain game modes which let you, Ground War (the one we play) for instance.
You will be able to use Party Chat in these play modes: Mercenary Team Deathmatch, Free-For-All, Third Person Teams.

However, you won't be able to use Party Chat in the following: Domination, Ground War, Demolition, Sabotage, Headquarters Pro, Search & Destroy, Hardcore Search & Destroy, Capture The Flag, Team Deathmatch, Hardcore Team Deathmatch, Third Person Cagematch.

Source: http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/c/cal...036;1338219.htm

:blink:

Says you can't for Ground War?

Source: http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/c/cal...036;1338219.htm

:blink:

Says you can't for Ground War?

I could have swore I saw it saying you could with Ground War when I was playing today. I'll load it up later tonight and double check.

Source: http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/c/cal...036;1338219.htm

:blink:

Says you can't for Ground War?

Trust teh Munky :p

There is 3 different "rules" over party chat.

You have the game modes which completely disallow it. Then you have game modes which allow party chat as long as they aren't MW2 parties and then you have others which allow party chat even on MW2.

Doesn't sound too hard, esp if you have scavenger equipped so you can keep loading up on ammo.

Just gotta be good at the game and not die :p

mw2loadout1.jpg

Can't aim without the red dot sight, takes too long to zero in with irons! I just blast them, move to a new location and keep getting the drop on them without giving my self away to the rest of the team all the time. Can camp in a location some times till I get my pred missile, double kill on that to my harrier then airstrike to my emergency. Job done. :D

Fortunately, as you can see, lucky me I ran out of ammo on my primary and secondary :E

Wish you could scroll through kill streaks though. Pain in the arse to get my drop and still need to use my harrier!

mw2loadout1.jpg

Can't aim without the red dot sight, takes too long to zero in with irons! I just blast them, move to a new location and keep getting the drop on them without giving my self away to the rest of the team all the time. Can camp in a location some times till I get my pred missile, double kill on that to my harrier then airstrike to my emergency. Job done. :D

Fortunately, as you can see, lucky me I ran out of ammo on my primary and secondary :E

Wish you could scroll through kill streaks though. Pain in the arse to get my drop and still need to use my harrier!

Agreed! That's been ****ing me off actually. Esp if you have a UAV and want to use an airstrike but can't see them on the map.

Had all sorts of issues last night and today trying to get games started. It seemed at first it was any time we invited a new person into the party it would screw up. We'd always have to back out and re-search.

But today it's x10 worse. We have to back in and out multiple times before we can stay together, and then even when we did, people kept being kicked from the XBL party chat :confused:

Yeah last night was annoying enough but today takes the cake for the worse I have ever seen Live behave personally. I could not stay in the party at all which was so weird. I was actually going to suggest we tried the game chat but did not want to have to hear the idiots that I know would have been on and especially since I was only playing for like an hour.

Says you can't for Ground War?

Without a doubt Ground War supports Live Party Chat. It is what we play the most as a result.

Longest range, most accurate gun and almost no recoil. But, does as much damage as an M4. If you can aim for the head take it over the SCAR.

I think I'll take it over the SCAR-H when its available then - the massive lack of recoil would be even better on my PS3 due to the sway effect.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!