[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

from fourtwozero: #MW2 Update in Test now: 1887s Balanced. Public "private" Match fix. Infinite Ammo fix. Prestige Hack on PS3 fix. Texture Hack on PC fix.

How about they fix the range on all shotguns too, just got blasted by a double shotty across the Quarry! Joke!

"fourzerotwo: #MW2 Update in Test now: 1887s Balanced. Public "private" Match fix. Infinite Ammo fix. Prestige Hack on PS3 fix."

ABOUT MOTHER****ING TIME!

Good to hear.

Is there any update about them resetting the stats at all? This infinite ammo has completely ruined any of the stats aspect of the game.

Good to hear.

Is there any update about them resetting the stats at all? This infinite ammo has completely ruined any of the stats aspect of the game.

Hope you don't mean a global reset as in everyone, because that won't happen. I haven't heard anything about the dodgy stats and stats from cheating players.

Hope you don't mean a global reset as in everyone, because that won't happen. I haven't heard anything about the dodgy stats and stats from cheating players.

Not a global reset but some kind of reset for the past week (which sounds impossible I know). I'm just saying now that I haven't played the last couple of days with this infinite ammo thing I've been knocked back 100,000+ spots on the kills list and nobody on my friends list has a legit kill streak anymore. Most have a 60+ kill streak due to those infinite ammo matches.

just went to a ground war match that turned into a 18 person free for all cage match on rust O_O.

Where you with us by any chance? I swear so stupid, and that was the first time I have played the game in like a week, and sure enough first match free for all on rust. In fairness though it was fine after that, but still just so stupid to deal with.

All I know is I finally tried the Battlefield Bad Company 2 MP Beta on the PS3 last night. It is no secret on here I am a fan of Battlefied, so as soon as it hits retail bye bye forever Modern Warfare 2, and I really may just trade it in soon so I get some credit.

Where you with us by any chance? I swear so stupid, and that was the first time I have played the game in like a week, and sure enough first match free for all on rust. In fairness though it was fine after that, but still just so stupid to deal with.

All I know is I finally tried the Battlefield Bad Company 2 MP Beta on the PS3 last night. It is no secret on here I am a fan of Battlefied, so as soon as it hits retail bye bye forever Modern Warfare 2, and I really may just trade it in soon so I get some credit.

Did they fix the hit boxes and bullet detection?

I never had an issue with it like you did, but to answer you I was on the PS3 controller so was not exactly on top of my A game so to speak, have not played an FPS on PS3 since Killzone so was a but rusty on the controller, but I got a few headshots (Assault class not sniping) and I felt right at home actually. And since I am a Tank ###### I went right into one, and it does seem the Splash Damage has been tweaked a decent amount actually. Even noticed it with grenades and grenade launcher.

I just personally love the pace of BF 10,000 times more than MW2. I can actually gather my thoughts.

Larry remember what I said last night after we played Bad Company 2?

"I forgot we weren't playing Battlefield. I was trying to run to the other side of the town without thinking I was going to be shot"

Exactly, it's like unless I move around in buildings and all slow on MW2, I die way to much. Battlefield, perhaps it is because I have played it for a while now and I am used to DICE's map design I don't know, but Battlefield I never feel like I do not stand a chance and I can actually run in the open and maybe only die 10% of the time.

Honestly plenty of people like MW2 including a lot of my friends. It really is just not my thing. I may still play it here and there unless I do really trade it in, but last night really sealed the deal for me.

Is there any reason for me to wait for the DLC or should I sell the game? i would really like a firefight or zombie type mode.

IMO I thought 4 was a lot more fun. 6 just is too much chaos going on. Even on objective maps 1/2 of the team camps. People are too obessed with K:D ratio than anything. I just want to win...screw kd ratio.

I really dislike the overall design of most of the maps. I do love Airport though. I just feel like I'm in a box on the rest of the maps. And that outside map with the underground passage is just pure lazyness. They threw a map outside and put a + underneath. COMON!!!

The ranking system is fail. I dont really even have to talk about this.

Also the glitches have ruined the game for me. 90% of the games I played in the last few days are Rust Hardcore TDM. Its so much fun when you die when you spawn 10x in a row. And last week it was Javellen glitches. Oh yeah dont forget about the Ammo hack.

Bring on the new Battlefield!!!!!!!

Looking at the xbox leaderboards last night really blew my mind. Seeing the points/kills/deaths/streaks in the top 10 really is insane. Are these people gonna get banned?

Is there any reason for me to wait for the DLC or should I sell the game? i would really like a firefight or zombie type mode.

I really do believe if Treyarch really want the gamer community to have a higher respect for them, the next COD game they develop should be specifically be based around Nazi Zombies. I really think a 4 to 8 player coop Nazi Zombie COD would be fantastic. And this wouldn't be left 4 dead either, because Nazi Zombies are slow and gets hard just by the sheer numbers

Looking at the xbox leaderboards last night really blew my mind. Seeing the points/kills/deaths/streaks in the top 10 really is insane. Are these people gonna get banned

They have been up there for about a month now. Why they have not been banned yet I have no clue.

We pay money for live and we are getting crap for support on this game.

Good god you people act like no game ever has had bugs before. The problems are getting patched, what is the problem exactly?

Remember there was no Beta. This could of possibly been avoided.

The problems are...

People make private games and then convert them into public games. Such as 18 people on rust in Hardcore TDM. The rounds never end also which leaves the games open. In the last 2 days 90% of my games were this. In one game I witnessed a AC130 with unlimted ammo on rust. The person racked up about 100 kills.

Also when they patched the Jav. glitch they broke the game and now we have unlimted ammo glitch.

This game has sold well over 5 million copies. They should be working 24/7 to get these problems fixed.

Remember there was no Beta. This could of possibly been avoided.

The problems are...

People make private games and then convert them into public games. Such as 18 people on rust in Hardcore TDM. The rounds never end also which leaves the games open. In the last 2 days 90% of my games were this. In one game I witnessed a AC130 with unlimted ammo on rust. The person racked up about 100 kills.

Also when they patched the Jav. glitch they broke the game and now we have unlimted ammo glitch.

This game has sold well over 5 million copies. They should be working 24/7 to get these problems fixed.

How do you know they aren't? Are you a software expert?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!