[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

Remember there was no Beta. This could of possibly been avoided.

The problems are...

People make private games and then convert them into public games. Such as 18 people on rust in Hardcore TDM. The rounds never end also which leaves the games open. In the last 2 days 90% of my games were this. In one game I witnessed a AC130 with unlimted ammo on rust. The person racked up about 100 kills.

Also when they patched the Jav. glitch they broke the game and now we have unlimted ammo glitch.

This game has sold well over 5 million copies. They should be working 24/7 to get these problems fixed.

FourZeroTwo has already said they are testing a patch to fix these issues. What more do you want?

How do you know they aren't? Are you a software expert?

No. I'm a average consumer that paid for something and did not get what was expected. The problem is I can not return it as you can with normal merchandise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjlH4D3s-eU There is the ammo glitch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgRx7rkBHQg There is the rust glitch.

FourZeroTwo has already said they are testing a patch to fix these issues. What more do you want?

A partial refund on my XBOX live account for starters.

Edit: I'll call Microsoft in a bit.

No. I'm a average consumer that paid for something and did not get what was expected. The problem is I can not return it as you can with normal merchandise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjlH4D3s-eU There is the ammo glitch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgRx7rkBHQg There is the rust glitch.

A partial refund on my XBOX live account for starters.

Edit: I'll call Microsoft in a bit.

Why would MS refund your Live fee?

I'm aware what the glitches are, IW is also aware and is in the process of patching them.

Good god you people act like no game ever has had bugs before. The problems are getting patched, what is the problem exactly?

When you charge ?10 more than anyone else for a game, you haven't really changed since the previous game, you kind of expect it to work out of the box. :laugh:

What? jihad javelin patch was in certification for less than a week before it went live.

You don't think a week is a long time to allow a huge developer to push a simple patch that is pushing a lot of players over the edge :blink: ? I think that's way too long.

You don't think a week is a long time to allow a huge developer to push a simple patch that is pushing a lot of players over the edge :blink: ? I think that's way too long.

If a glitch in a game is "pushing you over the edge" then maybe a week off from playing would be a good idea.

If a glitch in a game is "pushing you over the edge" then maybe a week off from playing would be a good idea.

No, glitches and bugs are annoying when you are trying to enjoy a game, it can easily push anyone over the edge as it has done with a huge percentage of the MW2 community. So try another angle to your trolling attempts.

No, glitches and bugs are annoying when you are trying to enjoy a game, it can easily push anyone over the edge as it has done with a huge percentage of the MW2 community. So try another angle to your trolling attempts.

Differing opinion = trolling!.

You guys are acting like the glitches are just being ignored by IW when they are actively testing and patching problems within an acceptable amount of time.

This game just fell victim to its' own hype.

I think people just expected more from this game as a whole, considering all that's been pumped into it. Not to have it bombarded with these huge bugs. Makes them seem a bit negligent from the start.

Differing opinion = trolling!.

You guys are acting like the glitches are just being ignored by IW when they are actively testing and patching problems within an acceptable amount of time.

Don't include me in that "you guys" as I know IW are releasing patches but Microsoft, as I just stated, are holding back these patches for way too long which hurts the players.

I'd rather have a well-tested slower patch than a quickly released buggy one.

I hope that comment wasn't in regard to my comment about the Microsoft certification process as those are not related, as soon as a patch hits certification it's not being tested for game purposes, it's just being screened and tested that it won't break anything related to the live network, break rules, contain anything illegal etc.

6 days is not "way too long".

For releasing a simple patch to fix major issues with a game you play? Yes it is.

Differing opinion = trolling!.

You guys are acting like the glitches are just being ignored by IW when they are actively testing and patching problems within an acceptable amount of time.

I'm with this guy, I love the game and all but if it's having this much of a profound effect on some of you it might be time to diversify your hobbies... and further more, 10 inch storgina.

I'm with this guy, I love the game and all but if it's having this much of a profound effect on some of you it might be time to diversify your hobbies... and further more, 10 inch storgina.

Profound effect, you people make it sound like a murder was committed over this game :rofl:

Aren't people allowed to be annoyed any more without the local hippies crawling out of their tents, correcting and lecturing everyone

Profound effect, you people make it sound like a murder was committed over this game :rofl:

Aren't people allowed to be annoyed any more without the local hippies crawling out of their tents, correcting and lecturing everyone

Have you been following the thread? Some are a little more than annoyed, in fact I can imagine sleepless nights spent tossing and turning. :laugh:

It's just humorous and I don't really care either way.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
    • Bluestacks has been emulating Android on Windows for fifteen years. It's janky and riddled with ads though, so WSA looked like it was going to be a huge improvement over the emulator experience. Too bad Microsoft dropped the ball on that.
    • Classic. China would be nothing without Western, Japanese, and South Korean technology.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!