[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

Remember there was no Beta. This could of possibly been avoided.

The problems are...

People make private games and then convert them into public games. Such as 18 people on rust in Hardcore TDM. The rounds never end also which leaves the games open. In the last 2 days 90% of my games were this. In one game I witnessed a AC130 with unlimted ammo on rust. The person racked up about 100 kills.

Also when they patched the Jav. glitch they broke the game and now we have unlimted ammo glitch.

This game has sold well over 5 million copies. They should be working 24/7 to get these problems fixed.

FourZeroTwo has already said they are testing a patch to fix these issues. What more do you want?

How do you know they aren't? Are you a software expert?

No. I'm a average consumer that paid for something and did not get what was expected. The problem is I can not return it as you can with normal merchandise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjlH4D3s-eU There is the ammo glitch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgRx7rkBHQg There is the rust glitch.

FourZeroTwo has already said they are testing a patch to fix these issues. What more do you want?

A partial refund on my XBOX live account for starters.

Edit: I'll call Microsoft in a bit.

No. I'm a average consumer that paid for something and did not get what was expected. The problem is I can not return it as you can with normal merchandise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjlH4D3s-eU There is the ammo glitch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgRx7rkBHQg There is the rust glitch.

A partial refund on my XBOX live account for starters.

Edit: I'll call Microsoft in a bit.

Why would MS refund your Live fee?

I'm aware what the glitches are, IW is also aware and is in the process of patching them.

Good god you people act like no game ever has had bugs before. The problems are getting patched, what is the problem exactly?

When you charge ?10 more than anyone else for a game, you haven't really changed since the previous game, you kind of expect it to work out of the box. :laugh:

What? jihad javelin patch was in certification for less than a week before it went live.

You don't think a week is a long time to allow a huge developer to push a simple patch that is pushing a lot of players over the edge :blink: ? I think that's way too long.

You don't think a week is a long time to allow a huge developer to push a simple patch that is pushing a lot of players over the edge :blink: ? I think that's way too long.

If a glitch in a game is "pushing you over the edge" then maybe a week off from playing would be a good idea.

If a glitch in a game is "pushing you over the edge" then maybe a week off from playing would be a good idea.

No, glitches and bugs are annoying when you are trying to enjoy a game, it can easily push anyone over the edge as it has done with a huge percentage of the MW2 community. So try another angle to your trolling attempts.

No, glitches and bugs are annoying when you are trying to enjoy a game, it can easily push anyone over the edge as it has done with a huge percentage of the MW2 community. So try another angle to your trolling attempts.

Differing opinion = trolling!.

You guys are acting like the glitches are just being ignored by IW when they are actively testing and patching problems within an acceptable amount of time.

This game just fell victim to its' own hype.

I think people just expected more from this game as a whole, considering all that's been pumped into it. Not to have it bombarded with these huge bugs. Makes them seem a bit negligent from the start.

Differing opinion = trolling!.

You guys are acting like the glitches are just being ignored by IW when they are actively testing and patching problems within an acceptable amount of time.

Don't include me in that "you guys" as I know IW are releasing patches but Microsoft, as I just stated, are holding back these patches for way too long which hurts the players.

I'd rather have a well-tested slower patch than a quickly released buggy one.

I hope that comment wasn't in regard to my comment about the Microsoft certification process as those are not related, as soon as a patch hits certification it's not being tested for game purposes, it's just being screened and tested that it won't break anything related to the live network, break rules, contain anything illegal etc.

6 days is not "way too long".

For releasing a simple patch to fix major issues with a game you play? Yes it is.

Differing opinion = trolling!.

You guys are acting like the glitches are just being ignored by IW when they are actively testing and patching problems within an acceptable amount of time.

I'm with this guy, I love the game and all but if it's having this much of a profound effect on some of you it might be time to diversify your hobbies... and further more, 10 inch storgina.

I'm with this guy, I love the game and all but if it's having this much of a profound effect on some of you it might be time to diversify your hobbies... and further more, 10 inch storgina.

Profound effect, you people make it sound like a murder was committed over this game :rofl:

Aren't people allowed to be annoyed any more without the local hippies crawling out of their tents, correcting and lecturing everyone

Profound effect, you people make it sound like a murder was committed over this game :rofl:

Aren't people allowed to be annoyed any more without the local hippies crawling out of their tents, correcting and lecturing everyone

Have you been following the thread? Some are a little more than annoyed, in fact I can imagine sleepless nights spent tossing and turning. :laugh:

It's just humorous and I don't really care either way.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!