[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

To tell you the truth, I don't find camping to be such a big issue; not like it is in games like Halo 2 & 3, or even the original MW. MW2 campers are fairly easy to flush or pick out. I've found the respawn to be random enough not to make camping too big of an issue, as well.

You think camping is worse in H2/3? I never had any problem with camping when I played either in multiplayer although I saw more of it in doubles than any other playlist; The same can be said for a few of the gametypes in COD4/MW2 as well.

It's just a matter of knowing where people and staying more alert.

Then again I played a lot of custom MLG gametypes and once MLG playlist was added I never left those.. Camping is usually not a problem especially considering there's no radar either.

My "senses" from that ported on over to MW2. Occasionally I'll die from someone sitting back literally hiding behind the most minute object but other than that I never have any problems. I've always been more support versus pushing forward all the time too so that makes a huge difference in gameplay and how often I don't die from stupid crap.

Spawning isn't random until both teams screw it up. So long as you maintain coverage in areas, you won't force a spawn to change. You have your whole team (or theirs) space out all over the map, of course spawns will be random.

---------------------

@Tech Star - I know it's not your video but I'm not sure how that's really an exploit. One Man Army is essentially the same as scavenger pro if you're sticking with the entirely same class. Which is why it's odd you'd stick with One Man Army but I guess that works out more if you plan on staying back versus rushing in / being near dead bodies to grab ammo.

An exploit would be purposefully finding a flaw in the game and using it how it wasn't designed for eg: using the javelins after button mashing. Not sure how using One Man Army + Danger Close Pro is an exploit. It's purpose is just that, ****ing **** up! If anything I do agree that perhaps the veracity of danger close pro can be tamed much like how the Akimbo 1887s were fixed.

If anything it just shows you to.. LOOK OUT FOR PEOPLE WITH LARGE STREAKS >AND< always make sure you either have a secondary vehicle launcher or at least a class you can switch to to equip it. I'm always carrying an AT4 or Stinger (preferably stinger) to shoot UAVs and other air vehicles down. I know at least a couple other people on my team do as well since we want to keep things as minimal as possible for the other team.

Especially if someone is going on a high streak, we don't want a counter-UAV to screw us over. That and I'd rather not have my boyfriend get ****ed when he gets killed by some random running around with marathon/lightweight/commando and his tact knife.

You think camping is worse in H2/3? I never had any problem with camping when I played either in multiplayer although I saw more of it in doubles than any other playlist; The same can be said for a few of the gametypes in COD4/MW2 as well.

It's just a matter of knowing where people and staying more alert.

Then again I played a lot of custom MLG gametypes and once MLG playlist was added I never left those.. Camping is usually not a problem especially considering there's no radar either.

My "senses" from that ported on over to MW2. Occasionally I'll die from someone sitting back literally hiding behind the most minute object but other than that I never have any problems. I've always been more support versus pushing forward all the time too so that makes a huge difference in gameplay and how often I don't die from stupid crap.

Definitely. I'm referring to spawn-camping, in particular. Spawn-camping was/is often an issue in both Halo 2 & 3, especially in objective gametypes, and is part of the reason I don't play those very often, anymore. I've never come across this issue in either CoD4, or MW2 because the spawn is random enough (despite coverage area by either team) and the maps are generally complicated enough to avoid it, as opposed to the simple, territorial maps such as Halo 3's Construct.

Camping is probably just as prevalent in MW2 as in Halo 2 & 3, but it's much less of an issue or exploit, in my experience.

Spawning isn't random until both teams screw it up. So long as you maintain coverage in areas, you won't force a spawn to change. You have your whole team (or theirs) space out all over the map, of course spawns will be random.

Also, note: Spawning is rarely ever completely random, and I certainly didn't imply as much. I completely understand the spawning rules of the game. Rarely, however, are you dropped on top of an entire group of teammates being massacred only to die with them and spawn again in the same gunfire over and over again. It certainly wasn't uncommon at all for this type of thing to happen in Halo 2, in particular. Though you generally spawn near your team in MW2, the spawning is less predictable than it was in the Halo games. That's why I said "I've found the respawn to be random enough not to make camping too big of an issue"

An exploit would be purposefully finding a flaw in the game and using it how it wasn't designed for eg: using the javelins after button mashing. Not sure how using One Man Army + Danger Close Pro is an exploit. It's purpose is just that, ****ing **** up! If anything I do agree that perhaps the veracity of danger close pro can be tamed much like how the Akimbo 1887s were fixed.

I agree with a lot of what you said, but not all of it. First of all, I don't think the javeline issue was so much an exploit as much as a glitch, which is why they patched it; it was something that shouldn't have been allowed to happen in the first place.

exploit

verb |ikˈsploit| [ trans. ]

make full use of and derive benefit from (a resource)

• use (a situation or person) in an unfair or selfish way

• benefit unfairly from the work of (someone), typically by overworking or underpaying them

What you explained as an exploit is probably just as correct as well. In fact, in this situation I can see where using One Man Army + Danger Close Pro could be considered an exploit by your definition. I can't imagine these two classes were intended to be combined to help noob-tubers constantly reload and reap kill after kill with one of the easiest one-shot weapons in the game.

Edited by Emily_June
Definitely. I'm referring to spawn-camping, in particular. Spawn-camping was/is often an issue in both Halo 2 & 3, especially in objective gametypes, and is part of the reason I don't play those very often, anymore. I've never come across this issue in either CoD4, or MW2 because the spawn is random enough (despite coverage area by either team) and the maps are generally complicated enough to avoid it, as opposed to the simple, territorial maps such as Halo 3's Construct.

Camping is probably just as prevalent in MW2 as in Halo 2 & 3, but it's much less of an issue or exploit, in my experience.

Spawn camping is quite different from just simply camping. I wouldn't say it was an issue in Halo 2/3 as so much as a tactic. I admit that I constantly spawn camped as often as I could; If we were able to adjust our tactics and gameplay to setup the team for being spawn killed, then we did it. Truthfully, it's only ever an issue when you're on the receiving end of it. It does suck to have that happen to you but that's what happens when you've got people who know everything about the map from player spawns, weapon spawn times, etc.

It's not hard to see where spawns are going and know where they will always go so long as you stay within that limit before you go too far to switch them behind you.

Construct wasn't nearly as bad for spawn camping as Narrows was. I mean it was so noticable that Bungie made changes to the playlist to alleviate the issue it had.. And even with changing the original spawns, you were still able to use it against your team.

As for spawn camping in MW2, I haven't seen as much as I did with Halo, so if you want to refer to spawn camping ONLY then yeah, I'd agree it is "worse" in Halo 2 & 3. As far as camping goes? Wouldn't really say it's worse (or better). Either that or I just don't die enough to notice camping.

Spawn camping is quite different from just simply camping. I wouldn't say it was an issue in Halo 2/3 as so much as a tactic. I admit that I constantly spawn camped as often as I could; If we were able to adjust our tactics and gameplay to setup the team for being spawn killed, then we did it. Truthfully, it's only ever an issue when you're on the receiving end of it.

...

As for spawn camping in MW2, I haven't seen as much as I did with Halo, so if you want to refer to spawn camping ONLY then yeah, I'd agree it is "worse" in Halo 2 & 3. As far as camping goes? Wouldn't really say it's worse (or better). Either that or I just don't die enough to notice camping.

No, I'm not referring only to spawn-camping (spawn-camping is still very much a version of camping, it's just being taken a step further.), but it's certainly what made camping, overall, such an issue in Halo 2 & 3 for me; and it was very much an issue, despite which team was doing it. Either you're on the team being killed--in which case you don't have a chance--or you're on the team doing the killing--in which case, there's absolutely zero challenge or enjoyment to the rest of the game--unless winning is the only pleasure you get out of the multiplayer. It definitely put me off of the game, and I know it did a lot of other people as well. Unfortunately, it just sucked a lot of the fun out of the game.

In MW2, I don't see camping as any kind of issue at all. It can become frustrating from time to time, but it seems like more of a tactical strategy than it was in Halo

It does suck to have that happen to you but that's what happens when you've got people who know everything about the map from player spawns, weapon spawn times, etc.

Learning the map, player spawns, and weapon spawns is insanely easy in Halo, which is my entire point. That's what makes camping (every kind of camping) such an easy exploit in the game. The maps are more complicated, player spawns are (in my experience) less predictable, and weapon spawn isn't even a consideration in MW2, which makes camping less of a negative for a lot of people, including myself. In fact, I do plenty of camping, myself, when the game calls for it.

Construct wasn't nearly as bad for spawn camping as Narrows was. I mean it was so noticable that Bungie made changes to the playlist to alleviate the issue it had.. And even with changing the original spawns, you were still able to use it against your team.

Spawn-camping isn't as common in Construct, but camping the lifts is. In a lot of Halo's maps, it's maddeningly easy to dominate the high-ground and pick off anyone trying to enter from the two or three only entrances in. Certainly not so much a negative issue, but much more noticeable than in MW2.

I don't believe I said camping was "worse" in Halo than it is in MW2, but it was certainly much more noticeable in my experience. Everyone is going to experience these games differently, which is why there are always mixed reviews on every game.

As I was saying from the start, I noticed the campers in Halo a lot more and found it to be much more of a negative aspect of the game than I do in MW2; I'm not entirely sure whether you're trying to convince me that this isn't my personal experience, or if you're just trying to share your own for the sake of sharing.

In Halo, as with MW2, camping is still just a part of the game and everyone has the opportunity to do it. It wasn't the kind of thing I couldn't adapt to, it was just the kind of thing that made it less enjoyable the more I did adapt. Instead of sticking around and whining about it to anyone who'd listen in-game, I chose to move on to a different game. I do still enjoy those games from time to time, but not as much as I once did.

Edited by Emily_June
Quarry hasn't been too bad for me. I like utilizing the rocks up facing C and tossing up a sentry gun on 'em and getting loads of kills.

Rocks are key for that map. Too many people head to the buildings and run around the outside. If two players can work together and lock down the middle it is easy to control the map, to include the crane. HCTM of course.

Wow. And people say this game is balanced. :D

I think this guy did a truly awesome thing by releasing that video. I know for a fact people will use the very same tactics that he uses in that video, but I think that will have to force IW to fix some things, as it truly shows that things are way off balance.

I think this guy did a truly awesome thing by releasing that video. I know for a fact people will use the very same tactics that he uses in that video, but I think that will have to force IW to fix some things, as it truly shows that things are way off balance.

It will be intresting of how they fix it. They will have to get a bit creative on this one.

I think this guy did a truly awesome thing by releasing that video. I know for a fact people will use the very same tactics that he uses in that video, but I think that will have to force IW to fix some things, as it truly shows that things are way off balance.

So I decided to actually try that out last night. Truthfully, it wasn't impressive nor did it have the veracity I was expecting. I was able to get chopper gunner about 6 or so times but it did not seem any different with danger close pro as he's making it out to be. Was his video setup with a bunch of morons running around?

Obviously the factors with this are: Are people on the other team equipped with a Stinger/AT4/Javelin? Is the map primarily full of buildings?

This just does not have the same impact that the javelin glitch had nor is it as bad as the Akimbo 1887's before IW lowered their range.

This video = worthless.

Wow the people in the above video are well...I've got no way to say it nicely. He makes a great point that the setup he is using is easy to get kills on (although I wasn't familar with One Man Army switching that fast which seemed odd).

That's because you need One Man Army Pro which is for fast-swapping.

Encountered somebody today trying to "boost" or whatever. I noticed that a green arrow was appearing right next to somebody firing repeatedly so I went over and investigated. I ended up killing the opposing booster and waited until he TI'ed to kill him again! :D I noticed the same group trying to do it later in the match as well and continued killing the booster. After that I think he was a little frustrated at me because the guy on my team trying to boost just followed me around the rest of the match and tried to get me killed (it didn't work). Really a funny experience.

Encountered somebody today trying to "boost" or whatever. I noticed that a green arrow was appearing right next to somebody firing repeatedly so I went over and investigated. I ended up killing the opposing booster and waited until he TI'ed to kill him again! :D I noticed the same group trying to do it later in the match as well and continued killing the booster. After that I think he was a little frustrated at me because the guy on my team trying to boost just followed me around the rest of the match and tried to get me killed (it didn't work). Really a funny experience.

haha sucks for him! Good work (Y)

Update .177 is up for PC. If you are on Steam you should be updated. Check your version number in the corner.

Fixes:

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2

1. Care Package, Emergency Airdrop, and Sentry Gun marker grenades sprint speed normalized

2. Sentry Guns: Improved placement detection, preventing cases of Sentry Guns inside geometry

3. Model 1887: Bling using Akimbo and FMJ combination now has same range and damage as non-Bling Model 1887s

4. Improved player collision removing cases of getting into geometry and 'elevators'

5. Mouse latency tweaks for more mouse movement consistency

6. Fixes to prevent various texture and XP hacks

The game is a lot more playable without speed/care package glitchers and overall feels a bit more even. The connection issues though are still frustrating and now I can say that I can play it with a bit more positive attitude before BF:BC2 comes out :)

Yesterday, I was playing a match and a guy on sub-base was able to protect himself in the corner with a claymore at the top of the stairs. Now I was thinking if you're close to your own claymore and it goes off, you die but apparently not, you can't get killed by your own claymore yet all other stuff such as grenades do. IW need to fix this. Also noticing a huge increase in double shotguns again, IW need to stop this as most shotguns require two hands to use!

Just updated the front article, not that it often gets read anymore, added all killstreaks, all perks and pro version descriptions, updates and patches too.

Cheers, helps newbies like me :yes:

PC Update -

* Care Package, Emergency Airdrop, and Sentry Gun marker grenades sprint speed normalized
* Sentry Guns: Improved placement detection, preventing cases of Sentry Guns inside geometry
* Model 1887: Bling using Akimbo and FMJ combination now has same range and damage as non-Bling Model 1887s
* Improved player collision removing cases of getting into geometry and 'elevators'
* Mouse latency tweaks for more mouse movement consistency
* Fixes to prevent various texture and XP hacks

New Hack - Negative XP - Reduces your rank back to 1

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!