[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

Got 33-4 on High Rise today, was pretty chuffed because the other team were just camping whenever possible and I got the predator/harrier/pave low twice so it pretty much won it for the team! We were about 3k behind and suddenly just whupped! I love it when Pave Low sorts out the campers (Y)

I love coming across riot shielders that forget to toss up blast shield. Gives me more sticky kills. I carry an AT4 though too so majority of the time I'll just hit them with that.

Although.. there are the few rare occasions when that awesome AT4 seems to bounce off the shield and back at me.. :(

I totally forgot about stickies. I'll have to give that a try next time. The guy I was playing against kept getting right in my face (going for a melee kill), and I didn't know what to do, apart from pray that a teammate comes in from behind and saves me. And this was on Favela, so we were pretty much always close to each other when we met.

I totally forgot about stickies. I'll have to give that a try next time. The guy I was playing against kept getting right in my face (going for a melee kill), and I didn't know what to do, apart from pray that a teammate comes in from behind and saves me. And this was on Favela, so we were pretty much always close to each other when we met.

Yeah I almost always use a semtex versus a frag. Works out perfect for those riot shields. Although, if they have on blast shield, it'll take more than just that since they'll eat up that semtex!

Microsoft clarifies Mod War 2 DLC deal News

Microsoft has revealed just how much of a headstart Xbox 360 owners will have with the new downloadable content for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2.

"We have a 30-day timed exclusive on the Modern Warfare content packs," a spokesperson told Eurogamer. "So it will be available on other platforms, but you get to try and play on Xbox 360 first."

The exclusivity deal was first announced at E3 last year. Back then John Schappert said it covered the first two map packs for Mod War 2.

The DLC is due to be released this spring but an exact date has yet to be locked down.

Wonder how much was paid for 30 days. :p

I finally ran into one of those marathon+lightweight+care package guys last night. He was moving pretty damn fast, but he actually wasn't playing that well at all. I checked on his score once during the match and he was 10-15. Granted, we were playing on Scrapyard, so there's a decent amount of open space between him and his potential victims. Makes stopping him pretty easy.

Earlier that night, I ran into a guy with the riot shield, and that was far more annoying...

annoying guys. all they do is knife or akimbo shotgun..

though i love it when i kill them multiple times cause there raging and are irrational.

****, i wanna punch Robert Bowling in his annoying face. Since last patch its taking ages to find a game that you can actually connect to, every second game just ends up with connection lost. Also crashing every 20 mins or so on map load. Untill few days ago it was "ok", bearable, but now its just infuriating, to say the least. Tools.

****, i wanna punch Robert Bowling in his annoying face. Since last patch its taking ages to find a game that you can actually connect to, every second game just ends up with connection lost. Also crashing every 20 mins or so on map load. Untill few days ago it was "ok", bearable, but now its just infuriating, to say the least. Tools.

Are you playing on PC, PS3, or 360?

Are you playing on PC, PS3, or 360?

Sounds like PC, where IWnet is completely f'd up. Hosts have been randomly crashing since the last patch so most games time out. And even before the crappy last patch iwnet has been horribly glitchy, with game lobbies randomly closing, not being able to join friends lobbies 70% of the time because it spits random nonsensical errors or just doesn't work.

IWnet is seriously the glitchiest, most obviously untested piece of software I have ever used.

IWnet is seriously the glitchiest, most obviously untested piece of software I have ever used.

Ouch, that really sucks :\ I don't doubt that it's probably the worst ever.. Considering how sloppy their site launch was I can only imagine how half-assed IWnet is.

I probably would have stopped playing if I had to deal with those issues. It's already bad enough in matchmaking when you're waiting 10+ minutes to find a match (in ground war, on Xbox 360.) I lose my patience then or when we're constantly having to back out because we dropped a player or the room we got into is ****ed up (when all mic icons are missing.)

I probably would have stopped playing if I had to deal with those issues. It's already bad enough in matchmaking when you're waiting 10+ minutes to find a match (in ground war, on Xbox 360.) I lose my patience then or when we're constantly having to back out because we dropped a player or the room we got into is ****ed up (when all mic icons are missing.)

Any strict NAT's? The only time it ever took more than 20 seconds to get into a game was when I was trying to buddy up with a UK friend (and two of his UK buddies) and since I'm from the US, it took about 3-4 minutes to find a suitable server (plus they all had strict NAT's).

Any strict NAT's? The only time it ever took more than 20 seconds to get into a game was when I was trying to buddy up with a UK friend (and two of his UK buddies) and since I'm from the US, it took about 3-4 minutes to find a suitable server (plus they all had strict NAT's).

All eight of us (including myself) have open NAT aside from one that has moderate to strict NAT. Even then the strict rarely plays with us and we still have the occurrence of party dropping or going into a bad room without him. (edit: He never has party lead anyway, it's always my boyfriend who has party lead with open NAT and typically pulls host out of the majority of us who live within ~20 miles of each other. Then again he did perfect his settings with his modem/router anyway, <3 my nerd.)

All eight of us (including myself) have open NAT aside from one that has moderate to strict NAT. Even then the strict rarely plays with us and we still have the occurrence of party dropping or going into a bad room without him. (edit: He never has party lead anyway, it's always my boyfriend who has party lead with open NAT and typically pulls host out of the majority of us who live within ~20 miles of each other. Then again he did perfect his settings with his modem/router anyway, <3 my nerd.)

Wow that sucks. The only time we ever have a problem where somebody gets kicked from our party is when I try to play with my friend who has a strict NAT. I have had games tell me my NAT is open when it clearly isn't though, so I went through my modem and router and promptly cleaned it up to make 100% mines open.

Ah I love MW2! Faced some guys that were talking some pretty heavy smack. I noticed pretty quickly that one of two guys that were talking smack was on our team (which was weird). After he was 0 and 5 I knew he was boosting. Somebody on our team followed him the entire match and the guy he was boosting still ended up getting over 30 kills which is sad because our team beat them hard. We always had somebody with a Stinger taking out any killstreaks so it was pretty hilarious to watch them try to boost.

Wow that sucks. The only time we ever have a problem where somebody gets kicked from our party is when I try to play with my friend who has a strict NAT. I have had games tell me my NAT is open when it clearly isn't though, so I went through my modem and router and promptly cleaned it up to make 100% mines open.

My nat is open and I correctly forwarded all my ports for this game and it STILL doesn't work right. And the host selection is crap, everyone always has horrible ping and it selects the worst possible host. I NEVER get host even though I have a fast computer and fast cable internet, the only way I can get host is by using the trick to make iwnet make you host, and when I am host no one lags. Yet it still picks these terrible hosts for everyone all the time, its ridiculous.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!