Recommended Posts

Whenever I go to stores now and browse through the Blu-ray section, there's quite a bit of people now. Before, the Blu-ray section used to be almost empty. Now, it seems like more people are there. In fact, there are times when it's a bit crowded and annoying. Does this mean Blu-ray is becoming popular now? I keep hearing rumors that Blu-ray will most likely become the next laserdisc.

Whenever I go to stores now and browse through the Blu-ray section, there's quite a bit of people now. Before, the Blu-ray section used to be almost empty. Now, it seems like more people are there. In fact, there are times when it's a bit crowded and annoying. Does this mean Blu-ray is becoming popular now? I keep hearing rumors that Blu-ray will most likely become the next laserdisc.

UGH.. why am I not surprised that you were the topic starter... yes.. its popular.. and no one can know if its going to be the next laserdisc... chances of it being so are slim...

Here is some info from the release of Watchmen

As we reported on our previous post, a full 36 percent of disc sales of Warner's 'Watchmen' have been on Blu-ray. This is a record-breaking figure, even for action movies. For example, back in September 2008, 'Iron Man' got "only" 17% of its sales from Blu-ray. The previous BD percentage record was for 'Quantum of Solace', released March 24, 2009, which got 28%.

This feat is all the more remarkable if we consider that the DVD had both one- and two-disc editions, and that an Ultimate Collector's Edition Blu- ray has been announced for later this year.

Edit #2 - some laserdisc info... in its 17 year life span by 1998 there were only 16.8 million player in homes worldwide... I think we already passed that in blu-ray players (including ps3)

According to Swicker & Associates, Blu-ray Disc software sales in the United States and Canada were 1.2 million in 2006, 19.2 million in 2007, and 82.4 million in 2008

Edit - Is there a reason you are so negative..? Didn't you just buy a blu-ray player recently?

Edited by jerzdawg

Blu-ray is the next step after DVD, bar none. I think up until recently the players were too expensive for most people to decide to purchase one, either that or they didn't have an HDTV to use it on, so there wasn't a need yet. The player may only be $200, but the TV they want may be $800, TV comes before the player in those cases because the TV or the DVD player will upscale until then at least. Now that the prices on HDTVs and Blu-Ray players are falling we're going to see a lot more usage of the BD format.

It was always going to get more popular as player prices come down and more HDTVs get bought - As for how popular quite frankly who gives a ****, if I and others interested get day 1 releases of HD (Blu Rays) with the DVD and the market booms enough to finance itself its just a case of buy what copy you want and enjoy the movie.

Both formats can co-exist easily, wanting to only see one or the other makes no sense.

Nope, it's not going to be popular as long as BluRay player prices are so high....

One of the things that scares Sony is the advance of USB disk drives. They are getting cheaper and faster and soon will get USB 3.0.

I dont think that it will be too long before we start seeing HD movies on USB sticks. Most of the new TVs come with USB ports anyway, and it's just a matter of time before they include a video and audio encoder to play those HD movies....

IMHO DVD/BluRay players are things of the past.

HD streaming and Portable Media Drives such as USB stick drives are the future..

Cheers

UGH.. why am I not surprised that you were the topic starter... yes.. its popular.. and no one can know if its going to be the next laserdisc... chances of it being so are slim...

...

Edit - Is there a reason you are so negative..? Didn't you just buy a blu-ray player recently?

Oh, sorry. I didn't know I was breaking any rules. I'm surprised the moderators didn't tell me anything. Oh well. I won't start any new topic here anymore. There are many other forums out there where they allow me to ask any question I like. I'll just ask them over there from now on. Sorry for the trouble. The moderators may close this topic, if they want.

Yes, I got my Blu-ray player a little over two months ago.

Edited by xraffle
Nope, it's not going to be popular as long as BluRay player prices are so high....

One of the things that scares Sony is the advance of USB disk drives. They are getting cheaper and faster and soon will get USB 3.0.

I dont think that it will be too long before we start seeing HD movies on USB sticks. Most of the new TVs come with USB ports anyway, and it's just a matter of time before they include a video and audio encoder to play those HD movies....

IMHO DVD/BluRay players are things of the past.

HD streaming and Portable Media Drives such as USB stick drives are the future..

Cheers

Yes I totally can't wait to own 40 USB sticks instead of 40 nicely printed discs in cases.

I'll give you streaming getting popular, it really will as broadband connections improve and we get systems delivering HD quality that isn't compressed out the ass, but USB sticks has to be one of the worst predictions I've heard in a long time.

it won't become a new laserdisc, but it won't be DVD IMO.

They expect that Blu-ray marketshare will be up to 15% of the market by next year. By 2013 it is kind of optimistically estimated that it might account for about 50%.

The problem is that optical media as means of delivering content is declining and Blu-ray is not able to compensate for the downfall and we have streaming/VOD growing at a rapid pace with it being integrated in TVs, players and consoles it only adds to uncertainty.

Edited by Boz
Nope, it's not going to be popular as long as BluRay player prices are so high....

One of the things that scares Sony is the advance of USB disk drives. They are getting cheaper and faster and soon will get USB 3.0.

I dont think that it will be too long before we start seeing HD movies on USB sticks. Most of the new TVs come with USB ports anyway, and it's just a matter of time before they include a video and audio encoder to play those HD movies....

IMHO DVD/BluRay players are things of the past.

HD streaming and Portable Media Drives such as USB stick drives are the future..

Cheers

That's a direction I always thought media would go but held back with per disc/drive cost. If they overcome that, hard to hold it back but I don't know if the cost of USB sticks will ever be low enough to hand out willy nilly like discs. I imagined walking into a store with your own usb stick and copying over whatever movie, game, music you want from kiosks then copying to whatever devices at home you have. That way retail survives along with digital distribution but both pushing technology and services forward.

Yes I totally can't wait to own 40 USB sticks instead of 40 nicely printed discs in cases.

I'll give you streaming getting popular, it really will as broadband connections improve and we get systems delivering HD quality that isn't compressed out the ass, but USB sticks has to be one of the worst predictions I've heard in a long time.

Thanks for the meaningful comment kiddo.

You should be able to buy the HD movie just like buying Itunes music.

It is up to you about how you want to store it.

AS prices go down you should be able to get 128GB+ USB drives that will hold around 30+ HD movies.

why would I want to keep a selection of discs that might get damaged when I can have my whole movie collection backed up on two chips. I should be able to take it with me when I go anywhere, traveling for pleasure or work.

Plus streaming movies will be the next big thing. It's already becoming popular. ABC, HULU, NEtflix, NBC are all switching to streaming media. It's a matter of time before we start getting HD streaming. Demand eventually will increase and that will drive AT&T and UUNET to upgrade their backbone with Optical Multiplexers capable of OC-192 and more bandwidth.

The cables are already laid out, they only need to upgrade the backbone.

Thanks for the meaningful comment kiddo.

You should be able to buy the HD movie just like buying Itunes music.

It is up to you about how you want to store it.

AS prices go down you should be able to get 128GB+ USB drives that will hold around 30+ HD movies.

why would I want to keep a selection of discs that might get damaged when I can have my whole movie collection backed up on two chips. I should be able to take it with me when I go anywhere, traveling for pleasure or work.

Plus steaming movies will be the next big thing. It's already becoming popular. ABC, HULU, NEtflix, NBC are all switching to streaming media. It's a matter of time before we start getting HD streaming. Demand eventually will increase and that will drive AT&T and UUNET to upgrade their backbone to Optical Multiplexers capable of OC-192 and more bandwidth.

The cables are already laid out, they only need to upgrade the backbone.

Maybe where you live, but definitely not in the UK.

As for wanting your 30 movies on one USB stick, good luck with that an DRM, all the set top boxes that stream HD content right now are proprietary, look at the 360 and PS3, if you buy a movie on either of them you must play it back through the 360 or PS3. I'd never buy a movie through either my PS3 or 360 in it's current state.

DRM is something that needs to change for movies and digital, because right now if you own a disc you can rip it to your own DRM free file and/or just take the disc to a mates.

Why would I buy a DRM infested digital copy when I can buy a physical copy and make my own digital copy meaning I own both in the end for the price of one? I admit I would prefer a digital library it's much easier but until these companies allow you to buy something digitally and do whatever you want with it it's early days.

Oh, sorry. I didn't know I was breaking any rules. I'm surprised the moderators didn't tell me anything. Oh well. I won't start any new topic here anymore. There are many other forums out there where they allow me to ask any question I like. I'll just ask them over there from now on. Sorry for the trouble. The moderators may close this topic, if they want.

Yes, I got my Blu-ray player a little over two months ago.

Not what I meant... I just didnt understand why you are so negative about a format that you are now invested in? You held off on switching to HD, you seem happy you made the switch, you picked up a blu-ray player fairly quickly and I think you have been impressed with some of the movies.. so I just didnt know why you would even entertain the idea of a rumor that is basically complete nonsense..

Maybe where you live, but definitely not in the UK.

........

Why would I buy a DRM infested digital copy when I can buy a physical copy and make my own digital copy meaning I own both in the end for the price of one? I admit I would prefer a digital library it's much easier but until these companies allow you to buy something digitally and do whatever you want with it it's early days.

Well I was referring to the backbone in the United States. I am not familiar with U.K. although I dont see reason not to switch if there is profit to be made.

About the DRM... it will change.. anyhow it's been only in the last few years that started playing such an important role in digital media but they'll have to flex and adjust to match the media and technology at stake.

They might add an encrypted signature key that will match the encryption key of your TV or other media player like laptop or PC registered to the same user, so you can not Pirate or redistribute movies illegally.

There are many options.... try to think out of the box.

Well I was referring to the backbone in the United States. I am not familiar with U.K. although I dont see reason not to switch if there is profit to be made.

About the DRM... it will change.. anyhow it's been only in the last few years that started playing such an important role in digital media but they'll have to flex and adjust to match the media and technology at stake.

They might add an encrypted signature key that will match the encryption key of your TV or other media player like laptop or PC registered to the same user, so you can not Pirate or redistribute movies illegally.

There are many options.... try to think out of the box.

That's the thing, there isn't.

BT aren't going to pay out their backsides to replace the 'whole' UK network, our Governments pushed so hard for the LLU switch over here allowing ISPs to run things their own ways marginalising BTs profits, therefore it's just not in BT's best interests to be going and upgrading our current networks to super fast speeds.

The ISPs can offer us cheap broadband through LLU, but they are limited to the network infrastructure BT has in place. So yeah in London you might get 24/50MBps, but the majority of the UK is probably on 2-4mbps.

As for DRM options, the only one I'll accept is what I have right now, I buy a movie on a disc and I can play it anywhere, on the PC, on my player, on my friends player. Until I can do that with a digital copy the restrictions aren't worth it because I can rip my own disc to a file I can play anywhere right now.

If digital copy isn't successful, how on earth is HD movies on USB sticks going to be any better?

I think you are missing the point.. physical delivery is going away.. that model is on decline and requires additional costs of production and what not..

I certainly won't keep my movies on USB, but on hard drives or NAS devices or whatever.. just like you do with music. There's absolutely no difference except size which is really not a problem anymore either.

The future is in downloads/streaming/VOD.. there's no doubt about that, the only question is how long optical media will stay on the market. It might be very much a while, but the efforts from studios and content providers will definitely lean digital downloads/streaming/VOD way.

Every single CE manufacturer now offers streaming in their devices. Panasonic just added Amazon VOD to their TVs and Blu-ray players, LG just added Vudu to their TVs, Samsung uses Netflix and so on.. most of these (Vudu, Amazon VOD, Netflix, Xbox 360, PS3) will, or already do, offer full 1080p instant-on in the next couple of months too so the quality is also rapidly increasing. Only last year we didn't even have 1080p HD streams, now we do. As speeds of broadband increase at people's homes (which they do actually at a decent pace as well) your quality is automatically upgraded with streaming/downloads/VOD. RIght now 1080p Instant-On might not be as good as Blu-ray but next year or year after that it might be, the thing is that most people are very satisifed with even 720p HD from XBL and on smaller sets the resolution thing becomes less relevant. Only a small amount of people actually appreciate Blu-ray, which was always the case with niche formats and those who demand the highest quality. To come really close to Blu-ray quality with new technology streams need be around 10mbps. So you'll probably need 20mbs cable connection and I don't think it will be a problem in a short while.

What I've noticed is that a lot of studios like RedBox too. And a lot of people asked themselves why? But it becomes pretty obvious when you realize that people don't own discs as much as they used to and actually prefer renting. If that's the case, then streaming/subscription services along with RedBox model is definitely where it's going.

It's all about renting and optical media can't survive if people just rent. That's why there's a decline.

Ask how many people on this forum, own a PS3 or Blu-ray and they barely ever buy Blu-rays but only rent. I can tell you from the people I see around me that have Blu-ray, most of them actually rent and only buy certain movies and that REALLY has to be a good movie to warrant a high price of Blu-ray purchase for example.

Edited by Boz

I'm seeing more and more shop space dedicated to blu ray, it appears to be increasing in popularity.

I'm not convinced the way forward is digital delivery, people like something in their hands to justify their money. Until this changes I don't think boxed media will dissapear.

Physical media isn't selling as well as it used to because people are downloading illegally. When I'm at work, they're about 3 people I know that admit to me that they do it. I tell them to buy or rent a certain movie because it's good. They're reply is: "Ah! That's a waste of money. I can just download it for free."

That's right. People are "illegally" downloading movies now, which is why physical media is declining in sales. The same happened with music. You don't honestly think that EVERYONE with Ipods have songs on them that are all legally copied. Very few people download their music and pay for them. The same will happen with movies. Why people would pick a ****ty DivX video over a nice, beautiful looking Blu-ray video in HD is beyond me.

Trust me. If storage will overtake Blu-ray, or even DVDs for that matter, they would've done that with music. Everyone listens to music on their Ipod or computer using memory. But they still refuse to ditch CDs despite its HUGE decline in sales. Apparently, no matter how successful memory-based media becomes, they will always try to have one physical media out there available as an option.

Edited by xraffle
Physical media isn't selling as well as it used to because people are downloading illegally. When I'm at work, they're about 3 people I know that admit to me that they do it. I tell them to buy or rent a certain movie because it's good. They're reply is: "Ah! That's a waste of money. I can just download it for free."

That's right. People are "illegally" downloading movies now, which is why physical media is declining in sales. The same happened with music. You don't honestly think that EVERYONE with Ipods have songs on them that are all legally copied. Very few people download their music and pay for them. The same will happen with movies. Why people would pick a ****ty DivX video over a nice, beautiful looking Blu-ray video in HD is beyond me.

Uhh I'm pretty sure those people are picking a nice 1080p DTS supported MKV rip, not a DivX encode... just saying, you know, Blu Rays do get pirated.

Where digital distribution can curve piracy from the digitally inclined is by offering high quality access at any time DRM free encodes (im not talking streaming 1080p, I'm talking maximum quality 1080p encode to download whenever you need it). Some people just need a little encouragement to buy something, they don't necessarily want to pirate everything.

I don't want to own discs any more for films, like I don't want cds for music, but I ain't touching digital until the DRM is gone and encodes offer me completely transparent video and audio quality. Why? Well as I've explained if you buy a Blu Ray movie on disc you can rip it yourself to those standards. May mean the film ends up on your hard drive and the Blu Ray on a shelf, but that's fine with me till digital distribution sorts it's act out. I'd rather own two copies of my movie and go through the hassle of ripping the movie to my hard drive than own some "contracted" digital film I only have a license to watch and can't watch on anything else other than my PS3/360/set top box.

Edited by Audioboxer
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!