Recommended Posts

I'd noticed a number of people in various forums saying that the Windows 7 Photo Viewer was slow to display images (compared to Vista and XP). I too found that performance, especially when manually flicking though a folder full of photos, was poorer than one might expect.

It turns out that the problem (for me at least) was caused by using the "Calibrate Color" applet built in to Windows 7. It generates a custom ICC profile and sets it as the default for the display. Once the custom profile is created and applied Windows Photo Viewer slows to a crawl. Delete the profile and performance is restored to normal.

Not exactly a major problem since most display drivers have their own controls for display calibration but I thought it worth mentioning in case the slow photo viewer is bothering others as it did me.

Just to be clear, if you haven't used the Calibrate Color applet and saved a new profile then as far as I know you won't encounter this problem.

A minor issue but one I hope is addressed in due course.

P.S. I use an ATI Radeon HD 4870. It did occur to me that the issue might only affect certain graphics cards. Anyone with nVidia hardware experiencing the same problem after running Color Calibration?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/808104-color-calibration-issue-in-windows-7/
Share on other sites

Just one more thing...

For those who can't tell any difference in Windows Photo Viewer performance with and without Color Calibration, try running the photo viewer windowed and using the left cursor key to flick backwards through a folder of photos. That's where the performance difference is most evident.

Information here is spot on, I was annoyed with the picture viewer performance, so much so I had to install Irfanview. I deleted the profile generated by the Color Calibration tool and picture viewer opened pics instantly.

Thanks for the feedback. May I ask what graphics card you're using? It would be helpful to know for sure if this problem is in any way influenced by graphics hardware.

I'm using a NVIDIA 8800GT (512mb) with 190.38 Win 7 drivers (x64).

Since I'm using a Radeon HD 4870 that points to it being a probable bug in Windows 7 rather than a driver issue.

Talking of bugs, anyone noticed another annoying one where icons for Removable Storage Devices (DVD-RW, etc) don't always refresh in the Computer window? I often have to eject my drives twice to get it to refresh.

Oh well, roll on SP1. :rolleyes:

Maybe this is a topic for another thread but I wonder how many of you favour Microsoft perfecting Windows 7 before even starting work on Windows 8?

Maybe it's middle age catching up with me but I wish we could get off the "new is best" merry-go-round and actually concentrate instead on making things (software and hardware) that work perfectly before they become obsolete! :(

  • 2 weeks later...

So that's what's causing it! I'm encountering the same problem, using Intel GMA 4500MHD. This is definitely a bug in Windows 7, unless all three hardware manufacturers are equally incompetent.

On a somewhat related matter, is anyone else having an issue where your color profile is not loaded after rebooting/resuming your system?

Every time, the stock color profile loads up. I go to the Color Management settings, and my custom profile is still selected. I have to select the stock profile and then my profile again in order to make it load up. After every boot.

It also happened in windows vista. Wait, maybe not, that was another bug. But I remember having a custom color profile caused photo viewer to go all iffy even if the rest of the windows looked okay. Same when you have 'enhacements' on in your sound options, windows media player profile is affected.

just wanted to tell how I stopped losing the gamma when I restart the computer.

I learned from this blog to uncheck igfxpers.exe from the autorun. (Start > Run... > msconfig > Startup)

http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-vist...amma-table-bug/

Intel GMA 4500HMD (Drivers - 15.15.0.64.1808 6/5/2009)

Windows 7x64 (RC1)

just wanted to tell how I stopped losing the gamma when I restart the computer.

I learned from this blog to uncheck igfxpers.exe from the autorun. (Start > Run... > msconfig > Startup)

http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-vist...amma-table-bug/

Intel GMA 4500HMD (Drivers - 15.15.0.64.1808 6/5/2009)

Windows 7x64 (RC1)

Can someone tell me where to find the files you're talking about deleting?

There's probably a quicker method but here's how I do it...

Go to Display Settings (where you change screen resolution, etc) and click on Advanced Settings. From there open up Color Management, click on the Advanced Tab and then Change System Defaults. In the windows that appears delete any entries that start with the filename CalibratedDisplayProfile. Close all open windows and try Photo Viewer again. It should be much quicker.

Great ... unless you use calibration for a reason ... I'm a designer and I have used calibration to match my screen to the best possible color I can.

Me too and I'm reluctantly putting up with the slow Photo Viewer so I can keep my custom calibration. Fingers crossed it gets fixed before SP1.

  • 1 month later...

RTM still has the problem - bummer I just discovered this feature. I can't replicate the functionality with nVidia control panel, I'm amazed at how much detail I've been missing from having an over "bright" or "gamma" laptop display. I toned gamma down all the way. Settings won't stick after a reboot, I have to manually re-apply the profile.

Great ... unless you use calibration for a reason ... I'm a designer and I have used calibration to match my screen to the best possible color I can.

I hope you don't rely on Windows 7 calibration as the standard. I have a hardware-calibrated monitor; it's the only real thing for any designer or photographer, like me.

Install the WAVE 2 version of Windows Live Photo Gallery on Windows 7 (the one that looks like the Vista versions and has toolbar icons) and there won't be any slowdowns. Note that only Wave 3 is currently offered by Microsoft.

  • 3 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      141
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      89
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!