Recommended Posts

I'd noticed a number of people in various forums saying that the Windows 7 Photo Viewer was slow to display images (compared to Vista and XP). I too found that performance, especially when manually flicking though a folder full of photos, was poorer than one might expect.

It turns out that the problem (for me at least) was caused by using the "Calibrate Color" applet built in to Windows 7. It generates a custom ICC profile and sets it as the default for the display. Once the custom profile is created and applied Windows Photo Viewer slows to a crawl. Delete the profile and performance is restored to normal.

Not exactly a major problem since most display drivers have their own controls for display calibration but I thought it worth mentioning in case the slow photo viewer is bothering others as it did me.

Just to be clear, if you haven't used the Calibrate Color applet and saved a new profile then as far as I know you won't encounter this problem.

A minor issue but one I hope is addressed in due course.

P.S. I use an ATI Radeon HD 4870. It did occur to me that the issue might only affect certain graphics cards. Anyone with nVidia hardware experiencing the same problem after running Color Calibration?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/808104-color-calibration-issue-in-windows-7/
Share on other sites

Just one more thing...

For those who can't tell any difference in Windows Photo Viewer performance with and without Color Calibration, try running the photo viewer windowed and using the left cursor key to flick backwards through a folder of photos. That's where the performance difference is most evident.

Information here is spot on, I was annoyed with the picture viewer performance, so much so I had to install Irfanview. I deleted the profile generated by the Color Calibration tool and picture viewer opened pics instantly.

Thanks for the feedback. May I ask what graphics card you're using? It would be helpful to know for sure if this problem is in any way influenced by graphics hardware.

I'm using a NVIDIA 8800GT (512mb) with 190.38 Win 7 drivers (x64).

Since I'm using a Radeon HD 4870 that points to it being a probable bug in Windows 7 rather than a driver issue.

Talking of bugs, anyone noticed another annoying one where icons for Removable Storage Devices (DVD-RW, etc) don't always refresh in the Computer window? I often have to eject my drives twice to get it to refresh.

Oh well, roll on SP1. :rolleyes:

Maybe this is a topic for another thread but I wonder how many of you favour Microsoft perfecting Windows 7 before even starting work on Windows 8?

Maybe it's middle age catching up with me but I wish we could get off the "new is best" merry-go-round and actually concentrate instead on making things (software and hardware) that work perfectly before they become obsolete! :(

  • 2 weeks later...

So that's what's causing it! I'm encountering the same problem, using Intel GMA 4500MHD. This is definitely a bug in Windows 7, unless all three hardware manufacturers are equally incompetent.

On a somewhat related matter, is anyone else having an issue where your color profile is not loaded after rebooting/resuming your system?

Every time, the stock color profile loads up. I go to the Color Management settings, and my custom profile is still selected. I have to select the stock profile and then my profile again in order to make it load up. After every boot.

It also happened in windows vista. Wait, maybe not, that was another bug. But I remember having a custom color profile caused photo viewer to go all iffy even if the rest of the windows looked okay. Same when you have 'enhacements' on in your sound options, windows media player profile is affected.

just wanted to tell how I stopped losing the gamma when I restart the computer.

I learned from this blog to uncheck igfxpers.exe from the autorun. (Start > Run... > msconfig > Startup)

http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-vist...amma-table-bug/

Intel GMA 4500HMD (Drivers - 15.15.0.64.1808 6/5/2009)

Windows 7x64 (RC1)

just wanted to tell how I stopped losing the gamma when I restart the computer.

I learned from this blog to uncheck igfxpers.exe from the autorun. (Start > Run... > msconfig > Startup)

http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-vist...amma-table-bug/

Intel GMA 4500HMD (Drivers - 15.15.0.64.1808 6/5/2009)

Windows 7x64 (RC1)

Can someone tell me where to find the files you're talking about deleting?

There's probably a quicker method but here's how I do it...

Go to Display Settings (where you change screen resolution, etc) and click on Advanced Settings. From there open up Color Management, click on the Advanced Tab and then Change System Defaults. In the windows that appears delete any entries that start with the filename CalibratedDisplayProfile. Close all open windows and try Photo Viewer again. It should be much quicker.

Great ... unless you use calibration for a reason ... I'm a designer and I have used calibration to match my screen to the best possible color I can.

Me too and I'm reluctantly putting up with the slow Photo Viewer so I can keep my custom calibration. Fingers crossed it gets fixed before SP1.

  • 1 month later...

RTM still has the problem - bummer I just discovered this feature. I can't replicate the functionality with nVidia control panel, I'm amazed at how much detail I've been missing from having an over "bright" or "gamma" laptop display. I toned gamma down all the way. Settings won't stick after a reboot, I have to manually re-apply the profile.

Great ... unless you use calibration for a reason ... I'm a designer and I have used calibration to match my screen to the best possible color I can.

I hope you don't rely on Windows 7 calibration as the standard. I have a hardware-calibrated monitor; it's the only real thing for any designer or photographer, like me.

Install the WAVE 2 version of Windows Live Photo Gallery on Windows 7 (the one that looks like the Vista versions and has toolbar icons) and there won't be any slowdowns. Note that only Wave 3 is currently offered by Microsoft.

  • 3 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AnyDesk 9.7.6 by Razvan Serea AnyDesk is a fast remote desktop system and enables users to access their data, images, videos and applications from anywhere and at any time, and also to share it with others. AnyDesk is the first remote desktop software that doesn't require you to think about what you can do. CAD, video editing or simply working comfortably with an office suite for hours are just a few examples. AnyDesk is designed for modern multi-core CPUs. Most of AnyDesk's image processing is done con­currently. This way, AnyDesk can utilize up to 90% of modern CPUs. AnyDesk works across multiple platforms and operating systems: Windows, Linux, Free BSD, Mac OS, iOS and Android. Just 7 megabytes - downloaded in a glimpse, sent via email, or fired up from your USB drive, AnyDesk will turn any desktop into your desktop in se­conds. No administrative privileges or installation needed. AnyDesk 9.7.6 changelog: Fixed Bugs Added validation feedback for passwords shorter than five characters Fixed an issue in AnyDesk One Meeting where the account name was used instead of the entered username after logging out Fixed crashes related to message editing and context menu interactions Fixed issues affecting message scrolling, text formatting, typing indicators, quoted messages, and community privacy settings Prevented users from editing automated system messages Corrected download status reporting, temporary file naming, and menu overlap issues affecting the Download History and Reactions pop-ups Other Changes Added chat list grouping settings Added keyboard navigation support (Page Up, Page Down, Home, and End) for the message feed Removed Chat language options Updated translations Download: AnyDesk 9.7.6 | 8.0 MB (Free for private use, paid upgrade available) Links: AnyDesk Home Page | Other platforms | Release History | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • It's interesting to hear that AI growth is not investor driven.
    • A few weeks ago, I had this same exact issue. Unfortunately, I didn't think of disabling the Secure Boot option in BIOS. I updated my BIOS to the latest version for my MB and it resolved the issue.
    • I have a partial answer, when I used a multi-port usb hub I had degraded speed performance with 3 large external hard drives connected. I managed to snag a nice (yet older) USB3 based wavelink docking station cheap / used that has x6 usb 3 ports and almost doubled the speed of the external hard drives transfer rate. This looks to be a slightly upgraded model -https://ebay.io/m/LZtjTy
    • Microsoft faces shareholder lawsuit over masking AI costs and slowing Azure growth by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft is facing a class action lawsuit from shareholders who allege that the company intentionally overhyped its artificial intelligence initiatives to distract from slowing cloud revenue and an exploding infrastructure bill. The complaint was filed in a Seattle federal court by the Michigan-based City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System. The plaintiffs argue that Microsoft’s leadership painted an overly optimistic picture of its Copilot rollout and complex OpenAI partnership. They say that the company did this while downplaying the harsh reality that building the data centers required to power these next-generation tools requires a huge amount of capital. Back at the company's Q2 2026 earnings report from late January, Microsoft revealed that its flagship Azure cloud growth had slipped to 39% (down from 40% the prior quarter) and guided investors to expect a further deceleration to 37% or 38% for the first three months of 2026. Now, under normal circumstances, a slight percentage point drop in cloud growth is a minor operational hiccup. But the Redmond giant paired that guidance with $37.5 billion in quarterly capital expenditures. This figure, which is a 66% year-over-year surge, blew past any analyst estimates at that time. Much of this amount went into buying high-priced GPUs and custom silicon that were required to train and run large language models. This is why the market reacted violently and just a day after its earnings call on January 29, the company's stock plummeted 10%, and wiped out $357 billion of capital in just a trading session. Microsoft is doing better now, though. Its Q3 2026 results showed its run rate from its AI business was hitting $37 billion, proving that enterprise demand for its infrastructure is very real and continuing to scale. Microsoft isn't the only company pouring billions into infrastructure for the AI boom. We've seen most Big Tech companies, including Amazon and Google, also get the results of these investments with stronger-than-ever growth and increased income. via Reuters
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      201
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!