Recommended Posts

I'd noticed a number of people in various forums saying that the Windows 7 Photo Viewer was slow to display images (compared to Vista and XP). I too found that performance, especially when manually flicking though a folder full of photos, was poorer than one might expect.

It turns out that the problem (for me at least) was caused by using the "Calibrate Color" applet built in to Windows 7. It generates a custom ICC profile and sets it as the default for the display. Once the custom profile is created and applied Windows Photo Viewer slows to a crawl. Delete the profile and performance is restored to normal.

Not exactly a major problem since most display drivers have their own controls for display calibration but I thought it worth mentioning in case the slow photo viewer is bothering others as it did me.

Just to be clear, if you haven't used the Calibrate Color applet and saved a new profile then as far as I know you won't encounter this problem.

A minor issue but one I hope is addressed in due course.

P.S. I use an ATI Radeon HD 4870. It did occur to me that the issue might only affect certain graphics cards. Anyone with nVidia hardware experiencing the same problem after running Color Calibration?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/808104-color-calibration-issue-in-windows-7/
Share on other sites

Just one more thing...

For those who can't tell any difference in Windows Photo Viewer performance with and without Color Calibration, try running the photo viewer windowed and using the left cursor key to flick backwards through a folder of photos. That's where the performance difference is most evident.

Information here is spot on, I was annoyed with the picture viewer performance, so much so I had to install Irfanview. I deleted the profile generated by the Color Calibration tool and picture viewer opened pics instantly.

Thanks for the feedback. May I ask what graphics card you're using? It would be helpful to know for sure if this problem is in any way influenced by graphics hardware.

I'm using a NVIDIA 8800GT (512mb) with 190.38 Win 7 drivers (x64).

Since I'm using a Radeon HD 4870 that points to it being a probable bug in Windows 7 rather than a driver issue.

Talking of bugs, anyone noticed another annoying one where icons for Removable Storage Devices (DVD-RW, etc) don't always refresh in the Computer window? I often have to eject my drives twice to get it to refresh.

Oh well, roll on SP1. :rolleyes:

Maybe this is a topic for another thread but I wonder how many of you favour Microsoft perfecting Windows 7 before even starting work on Windows 8?

Maybe it's middle age catching up with me but I wish we could get off the "new is best" merry-go-round and actually concentrate instead on making things (software and hardware) that work perfectly before they become obsolete! :(

  • 2 weeks later...

So that's what's causing it! I'm encountering the same problem, using Intel GMA 4500MHD. This is definitely a bug in Windows 7, unless all three hardware manufacturers are equally incompetent.

On a somewhat related matter, is anyone else having an issue where your color profile is not loaded after rebooting/resuming your system?

Every time, the stock color profile loads up. I go to the Color Management settings, and my custom profile is still selected. I have to select the stock profile and then my profile again in order to make it load up. After every boot.

It also happened in windows vista. Wait, maybe not, that was another bug. But I remember having a custom color profile caused photo viewer to go all iffy even if the rest of the windows looked okay. Same when you have 'enhacements' on in your sound options, windows media player profile is affected.

just wanted to tell how I stopped losing the gamma when I restart the computer.

I learned from this blog to uncheck igfxpers.exe from the autorun. (Start > Run... > msconfig > Startup)

http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-vist...amma-table-bug/

Intel GMA 4500HMD (Drivers - 15.15.0.64.1808 6/5/2009)

Windows 7x64 (RC1)

just wanted to tell how I stopped losing the gamma when I restart the computer.

I learned from this blog to uncheck igfxpers.exe from the autorun. (Start > Run... > msconfig > Startup)

http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/windows-vist...amma-table-bug/

Intel GMA 4500HMD (Drivers - 15.15.0.64.1808 6/5/2009)

Windows 7x64 (RC1)

Can someone tell me where to find the files you're talking about deleting?

There's probably a quicker method but here's how I do it...

Go to Display Settings (where you change screen resolution, etc) and click on Advanced Settings. From there open up Color Management, click on the Advanced Tab and then Change System Defaults. In the windows that appears delete any entries that start with the filename CalibratedDisplayProfile. Close all open windows and try Photo Viewer again. It should be much quicker.

Great ... unless you use calibration for a reason ... I'm a designer and I have used calibration to match my screen to the best possible color I can.

Me too and I'm reluctantly putting up with the slow Photo Viewer so I can keep my custom calibration. Fingers crossed it gets fixed before SP1.

  • 1 month later...

RTM still has the problem - bummer I just discovered this feature. I can't replicate the functionality with nVidia control panel, I'm amazed at how much detail I've been missing from having an over "bright" or "gamma" laptop display. I toned gamma down all the way. Settings won't stick after a reboot, I have to manually re-apply the profile.

Great ... unless you use calibration for a reason ... I'm a designer and I have used calibration to match my screen to the best possible color I can.

I hope you don't rely on Windows 7 calibration as the standard. I have a hardware-calibrated monitor; it's the only real thing for any designer or photographer, like me.

Install the WAVE 2 version of Windows Live Photo Gallery on Windows 7 (the one that looks like the Vista versions and has toolbar icons) and there won't be any slowdowns. Note that only Wave 3 is currently offered by Microsoft.

  • 3 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • No support for Windows Hello!
    • I think you meant the "ntfs3" driver, but yes there have been a lot of fixes for it in this release and previous releases, not 100% sure if the issue you mentioned is fixed though. In any case, the new "ntfs" driver in 7.1 doesn't have that issue (at least, no reports of such have come thru), but your kernel needs to explicitly enable support for the new driver first (like how CachyOS kernel has it), and you need to edit your mount points in /etc/fstab to use "ntfs" instead of the other drivers.
    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Epic Games is rolling out the latest major update to Unreal Engine 5 today, and at the same time, the company also dropped some information on the next-generation version of the product, Unreal Engine 6. This was already revealed a few weeks ago alongside the new Rocket League upgrade reveal. The company says it is combining the features of Unreal Engine and Unreal Editor for Fortnite to create this new version of its popular media creation tool. On top of creating entire games, the new engine will also focus on letting developers operate large-scale live service titles more easily, whether by shipping content into their own ecosystems or into Fortnite. The use of large language models is also mentioned here, with Epic saying it will be a core part of the engine. "We see LLMs, generative AI models, and tools like Claude and Codex playing a central role in helping you build content faster while maintaining the creative control you need," adds the company. Here is the rundown of what's new about version 6 of Unreal Engine: With all these changes to the programming model, portability upgrades, and generative AI integration, Epic says the new version of the engine will "change a lot about how games are made." The company aims to ship Unreal Engine 6 into early access in late 2027, with a full release planned for 12-18 months later. Epic Games also dropped a lengthy blog post about the new Unreal Engine 5.8 update for game developers over here. The release is focused on delivering better performance, customization, and streamlined workflows for development teams. This will be the final major update for this version of the engine before Epic switches to focus fully on Unreal Engine 6's early access launch.
    • Watch Louis Rossmann's recent experience on YouTube about trying to get a warranty replacement from Samsung. It's crazy.
    • That is the thing, how many of these people don't realise they are using AI? If they use Google Search they have no choice but to use AI. So yes, maybe half of American adults do use and I expect a lot of Uk adults do to, but I bet most of them don't realise it. Myself, i avoid the rubbish.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!