Recommended Posts

i would like to have the option of a classic start menu, a classic taskbar and a classic design of windows explorer.

but i guess these options won't come back anymore.

-andy-

And thank god for that it was about time to get rid of those options permanently.

As for codecs well I have not had to install even one on Windows 7 and all my media plays just fine. I got rid of .mkv and move all my videos to .m2ts containers (all of them were DXVA compliant with AC3 or DTS) so no more thumbnail problems ether.

Did not have to restart for any of the drivers I had to install with was not much. Have had no BSOD at all with 7.

On a side not I updated the Video drivers on my Linux box and had to restart the systems not just xorg!!

Ah, that's one. It'd be nice to be able to see the specific services under svchost.exe without needing extra software.

Actually, you already can do this with Win7. Just right click a svchost.exe process & choose "Go To Service(s)", you'll be switched to the services tab with the relevant services highlighted.

This might not be possible, but I think it's worth mentioning. It'd be nice to have a single folder for the save files of PC games. Whether it be your little sister's Barbie game or your hardcore first-person shooter game, having it all in one location would make things easier. Imagine not having to start all over after you format and reinstall Windows. Imagine having to search for the game's save file because your friend accidentally deleted his.

I realize it's a little much and it doesn't apply to every game out there; however, I feel that it's doable and that it would make gaming in Windows all the more easier. That's my only "wish" for now.

Actually, there is a folder in your usenames directory called 'Saved Games'. Microsoft created that ability, but game developers are not using them.

95% of dell drivers need a reboot after install.

How about you skip the Dell crapware and go to each of the manufacturers and download their individual drivers? I'm thinking this could be your problem with Windows 7 running slower on your hardware.

Not to turn this into a fight over details but actually, literally speaking, Linux currently supports more hardware than Vista or Win7 (out of the box) - although they're mainly historical items that not many people still use but the support is there :-)

I know this, but the OOTB experience doesn't match that of a default Windows install.

Sorry but like I said earlier, it seems people are pointing out Linux problems and think that Windows either runs exactly Linux and doesn't understand how the systems are different from each other, have completely no idea what they are talking about or either suggesting a "feature" like removing drivers to some how make the system better? The drivers are just files, nothing more. They don't hurt the performance or the space of the hard disk, removing them won't make any speed difference, at all.

...

On a side not I updated the Video drivers on my Linux box and had to restart the systems not just xorg!!

That is just the simplified update alert popup. It is for a "simpler user experience", so it will just recommend reboot.

The fact is, you do not have to reboot for an X driver change. Just restart X. Not for a Firefox upgrade, just firefox. Not for a system service upgrade, just bounce the service. Not even for a kernel module driver, just do a insmod/modprobe.

You have a choice to just do the restart X thing, or obey the bubble. You must be on Ubuntu. That is the only distro that I know of that does this.

...

Sorry but like I said earlier, it seems people are pointing out Linux problems and think that Windows either runs exactly Linux and doesn't understand how the systems are different from each other, have completely no idea what they are talking about or either suggesting a "feature" like removing drivers to some how make the system better? The drivers are just files, nothing more. They don't hurt the performance or the space of the hard disk, removing them won't make any speed difference, at all.

I agree with you that some of these items are just personal preferences. There may be advantages/disadvantages to doing some things one way versus another. But Windows and OSX (or Linux) have just picked different directions to model their systems around. You, as a user, can elect to choose an OS that suits your preferences more, if you find your current OS doesn't do things the way you want to. (Y)

What the **** is wrong with everyone in the world today!? Is everyone that damn ignorant? This threads title is "what would YOU LIKE TO BE IMPLEMENTED INTO WINDOWS 7," not "WHAT THINGS THAT SOMEONE ELSE WOULD LIKE TO BE IMPLEMENTED INTO WINDOWS 7 THAT YOU THINK IS IMPOSSIBLE OR STUPID TO PUT INTO IT, SO YOU SHOULD DEFINITELY TELL THEM OTHERWISE SO THAT YOU CAN SHOW HOW MUCH MORE YOU THINK YOU KNOW ABOUT EVERYTHING."

All I wanted to hear was ideas, not a debate on what Linux can do or why it's impossible because Windows will never change.

Why is it so hard to follow a thread for anyone anymore? I blame this on the American media, telling everyone that we're American, we don't have to listen to anyone.

Can we stay on topic for ONE DAMN THREAD!?

I would like implemented a skinning tool as well, maybe change up my own themes every now and then. I don't see why they still have to hack the resources, it should be the users risk if something messes up (as usual.)

No offense, but it's your own damn fault for wishing Windows had/did things that really are impossible in any operating system, and for making incorrect claims about Windows and other OSes.

Is it a fairytale thread? Can I wish that Windows came bundled with a burgundy unicorn?

It would be nice to be able to do some customization of the toolbar in Explorer. At least the option of having a 'Delete' button (I know, I can just click the 'Delete' key on my keyboard) and a Folder & Layout Options button. That's just me.

No offense, but it's your own damn fault for wishing Windows had/did things that really are impossible in any operating system, and for making incorrect claims about Windows and other OSes.

Is it a fairytale thread? Can I wish that Windows came bundled with a burgundy unicorn?

I want an ice cream cone every time I click an OK button too! La la la la la.

I'm sorry but that is the dumbest reason I've heard...explain to me how MS would replace it and also explain how you would fix the myriad of (now broken) Windows apps that will no longer work?

Virtualize it. Any access to the "registry" apart from the OS would redirect all program settings to it's own private data store. Those would then be accesses/loaded/used when the app starts and unloaded when the app is terminated.

Virtualize it. Any access to the "registry" apart from the OS would redirect all program settings to it's own private data store. Those would then be accesses/loaded/used when the app starts and unloaded when the app is terminated.

Nothing wrong with the registry, what you want to implement would break everything, and 'Virtualize' it sounds like you want to add performance overhead.

What format would this "private data store" be in? Are you now just creating a hundred miniature registry hives, one for each application? What is the point? What is the advantage supposed to be?

Personally I think that applications should refrain from storing private configuration data in the registry, they should store it in the roaming/local folder, and only use the registry for system-wide settings (like registering servers), but that has nothing to do with the registry itself. It seems like these complaints almost always boil down to application (ab)use of the registry, rather than the registry itself.

What format would this "private data store" be in? Are you now just creating a hundred miniature registry hives, one for each application? What is the point? What is the advantage supposed to be?

Personally I think that applications should refrain from storing private configuration data in the registry, they should store it in the roaming/local folder, and only use the registry for system-wide settings (like registering servers), but that has nothing to do with the registry itself. It seems like these complaints almost always boil down to application (ab)use of the registry, rather than the registry itself.

+1

Applications can run from config files if it wants too, if developers choose to run it from a registry then it's their fault.

Nothing wrong with the registry, what you want to implement would break everything, and 'Virtualize' it sounds like you want to add performance overhead.

It's called API redirection. An app uses the registry API and instead of writing to the central OS registry it'll write those setting to a private data store. Those can then be loaded and unloaded when needed as the apps are used.

Well, it's to late now for Win7, but for Win8 I'd like to see them go to a micro kernel OS (like the *nix)

why, do you even know what you are saying? By the way, linux and windows are like most modern kernels a mix of monolithic and microkernel design. With the emphasis on monolithic design.

Edited by XerXis
A lot of installer reboots have nothing to do with Windows requirements though. They just reboot because they feel like it. The only place I see where there could be fewer reboots is when it comes to updates. The issue though, is how you update files that are in use. Windows has an extremely modular design with focus on shared components (libraries, servers). You can't replace these if they are in use, you'd have to wait until they unloaded. Some of them never unload until you reboot, because they are always in use. There's also the issue of inter-dependencies. What if you have two components that depend on each other, and only update one of them because the other couldn't be unloaded? You now have a version conflict (at least until the next time the system is rebooted), which can be dangerous.

Exactly. I think most of the restarts from driver installs are more because the company that developed the driver wants to make sure there isn't an issue. It isn't Windows asserting that an update is necessary...

It can't be improved, and there can't be a new version. It already does everything it can. All the restrictions are down to fundamental Windows designs, and there is nothing the program can do about it. The most annoying thing is that the compositing window manager (DWM) only supports one desktop, so you can't have Aero on any of the others. It's just not designed to be used for virtual desktops.

Well, there are some other applications that can do this that are a good deal more feature rich. So I don't know how they did that, but they allow features like dragging applications in new desktops, etc. Last I looked they were rather costly though. So, not sure what's involved, but I keep hoping that perhaps Sysinternals will also find work arounds to these issues. One of the biggest frustrations for me is with regards to things that run at startup like SQL Server. You can't run an application in one of the other desktops that uses SQL Server because it does not support stuff like this... Aero I can live without in the other desktops.

And dual listers so you can have both the source and destination side-by-side in the same window!

OMG, that would be amazing. I would love that. :)

yes i think process explorer of sysinternals must be default task manager.

& then people complained about registry, i think it is the most powerful yet most vulnerable feature of windows. i don't think there could be better alternate to it.

I don't really understand the registry argument myself. I've seen people argue that it should have a more pleasant UI in other threads, and it just seems silly to me. To me the registry SHOULD be a scary place to go... If you make it appealing or less scary looking you will have a lot of people that shouldn't be in the registry making changes and breaking things... My rule has always been: If the registry scares you, or is too complicated for you, you shouldn't be in it... If I don't know what a registry value is for, I'm not touching it... LOL

95% of dell drivers need a reboot after install.

Which sounds like a Dell issue to me. I've noticed that as well, but Windows isn't determining that a reboot is necessary...

Actually, there is a folder in your usenames directory called 'Saved Games'. Microsoft created that ability, but game developers are not using them.

MS's insistence on putting everything on the system drive is really aggravating for anyone that likes to keep their system files and software/data files on separate drives. I read that MS even wants to add a requirement to Games For Windows that GFW certified games can only be installed in Program Files; for security reasons supposedly, I hope it's just a rumour. I'm glad no one is listening to MS because it is a bad idea!

Well, there are some other applications that can do this that are a good deal more feature rich. So I don't know how they did that, but they allow features like dragging applications in new desktops, etc. Last I looked they were rather costly though. So, not sure what's involved, but I keep hoping that perhaps Sysinternals will also find work arounds to these issues.

Those other programs don't actually use multiple desktops, they just have the one and cleverly manipulate it to give the impression that there are more. They do this by doing things like hiding the Windows and task bar buttons that belong to another "desktop" than what is active. This is a rather large hack, and none of them really seem to work quite right.

99% of what you want is technically impossible or would be very unsecure. Also, BSODs help you. They end your session before stuff gets all corrupted. If you want "drivers and codecs like linux" then go use Linux. Drivers need to restart the computer. This isn't specific to Windows for a reason. Continue previous sessions would be a nice one, though, although hibernating works to the same effect, basically. Don't assign a password to your user account if you don't want to deal with the files from previous installs. Simple as that. Microsoft isn't going to remove their security just so YOU don't need to right click and choose "take ownership". Some people like security.

+1 - also the removal of BSOD's would just make the system terrible to use and harder to diagnose.

What format would this "private data store" be in? Are you now just creating a hundred miniature registry hives, one for each application? What is the point? What is the advantage supposed to be?

Personally I think that applications should refrain from storing private configuration data in the registry, they should store it in the roaming/local folder, and only use the registry for system-wide settings (like registering servers), but that has nothing to do with the registry itself. It seems like these complaints almost always boil down to application (ab)use of the registry, rather than the registry itself.

The original idea of the registry was to accumulate all the *.ini files in one location. This idea sounded neat at first but has become something that is more or less a bottleneck to the system. I would much prefer if windows took a linux approach to storing settings etc. It's easy to backup, easy to edit (when necessary) and just seems cleaner.

Having said that, I doubt ms will ever change the way that registries work. They're here to stay but instead of replacing it I wish they would just make it faster.

+1 - also the removal of BSOD's would just make the system terrible to use and harder to diagnose.

I think BSODs should stay too but removing them won't be a problem as long as the log files are easily accessible. Why would it make a system terrible to use? Average user wouldn't know what to do with a BSOD but to restart the computer. Only experts would bother diagnosing it and rather than reading the bsod off the screen they would just read the dump that is made.

They should replace the BSOD with a helpful message along with the location of the dump so the user has some clue of what to do.

The only thing I can think of at the minute would be a 'Calendar' function built into the taskbar clock somehow .. for alarms, notes, schedules .. that sort of thing. Maybe tied into the task scheduler somehow ..

+1. a nice idea.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!