Recommended Posts

i would like to have the option of a classic start menu, a classic taskbar and a classic design of windows explorer.

but i guess these options won't come back anymore.

-andy-

And thank god for that it was about time to get rid of those options permanently.

As for codecs well I have not had to install even one on Windows 7 and all my media plays just fine. I got rid of .mkv and move all my videos to .m2ts containers (all of them were DXVA compliant with AC3 or DTS) so no more thumbnail problems ether.

Did not have to restart for any of the drivers I had to install with was not much. Have had no BSOD at all with 7.

On a side not I updated the Video drivers on my Linux box and had to restart the systems not just xorg!!

Ah, that's one. It'd be nice to be able to see the specific services under svchost.exe without needing extra software.

Actually, you already can do this with Win7. Just right click a svchost.exe process & choose "Go To Service(s)", you'll be switched to the services tab with the relevant services highlighted.

This might not be possible, but I think it's worth mentioning. It'd be nice to have a single folder for the save files of PC games. Whether it be your little sister's Barbie game or your hardcore first-person shooter game, having it all in one location would make things easier. Imagine not having to start all over after you format and reinstall Windows. Imagine having to search for the game's save file because your friend accidentally deleted his.

I realize it's a little much and it doesn't apply to every game out there; however, I feel that it's doable and that it would make gaming in Windows all the more easier. That's my only "wish" for now.

Actually, there is a folder in your usenames directory called 'Saved Games'. Microsoft created that ability, but game developers are not using them.

95% of dell drivers need a reboot after install.

How about you skip the Dell crapware and go to each of the manufacturers and download their individual drivers? I'm thinking this could be your problem with Windows 7 running slower on your hardware.

Not to turn this into a fight over details but actually, literally speaking, Linux currently supports more hardware than Vista or Win7 (out of the box) - although they're mainly historical items that not many people still use but the support is there :-)

I know this, but the OOTB experience doesn't match that of a default Windows install.

Sorry but like I said earlier, it seems people are pointing out Linux problems and think that Windows either runs exactly Linux and doesn't understand how the systems are different from each other, have completely no idea what they are talking about or either suggesting a "feature" like removing drivers to some how make the system better? The drivers are just files, nothing more. They don't hurt the performance or the space of the hard disk, removing them won't make any speed difference, at all.

...

On a side not I updated the Video drivers on my Linux box and had to restart the systems not just xorg!!

That is just the simplified update alert popup. It is for a "simpler user experience", so it will just recommend reboot.

The fact is, you do not have to reboot for an X driver change. Just restart X. Not for a Firefox upgrade, just firefox. Not for a system service upgrade, just bounce the service. Not even for a kernel module driver, just do a insmod/modprobe.

You have a choice to just do the restart X thing, or obey the bubble. You must be on Ubuntu. That is the only distro that I know of that does this.

...

Sorry but like I said earlier, it seems people are pointing out Linux problems and think that Windows either runs exactly Linux and doesn't understand how the systems are different from each other, have completely no idea what they are talking about or either suggesting a "feature" like removing drivers to some how make the system better? The drivers are just files, nothing more. They don't hurt the performance or the space of the hard disk, removing them won't make any speed difference, at all.

I agree with you that some of these items are just personal preferences. There may be advantages/disadvantages to doing some things one way versus another. But Windows and OSX (or Linux) have just picked different directions to model their systems around. You, as a user, can elect to choose an OS that suits your preferences more, if you find your current OS doesn't do things the way you want to. (Y)

What the **** is wrong with everyone in the world today!? Is everyone that damn ignorant? This threads title is "what would YOU LIKE TO BE IMPLEMENTED INTO WINDOWS 7," not "WHAT THINGS THAT SOMEONE ELSE WOULD LIKE TO BE IMPLEMENTED INTO WINDOWS 7 THAT YOU THINK IS IMPOSSIBLE OR STUPID TO PUT INTO IT, SO YOU SHOULD DEFINITELY TELL THEM OTHERWISE SO THAT YOU CAN SHOW HOW MUCH MORE YOU THINK YOU KNOW ABOUT EVERYTHING."

All I wanted to hear was ideas, not a debate on what Linux can do or why it's impossible because Windows will never change.

Why is it so hard to follow a thread for anyone anymore? I blame this on the American media, telling everyone that we're American, we don't have to listen to anyone.

Can we stay on topic for ONE DAMN THREAD!?

I would like implemented a skinning tool as well, maybe change up my own themes every now and then. I don't see why they still have to hack the resources, it should be the users risk if something messes up (as usual.)

No offense, but it's your own damn fault for wishing Windows had/did things that really are impossible in any operating system, and for making incorrect claims about Windows and other OSes.

Is it a fairytale thread? Can I wish that Windows came bundled with a burgundy unicorn?

It would be nice to be able to do some customization of the toolbar in Explorer. At least the option of having a 'Delete' button (I know, I can just click the 'Delete' key on my keyboard) and a Folder & Layout Options button. That's just me.

No offense, but it's your own damn fault for wishing Windows had/did things that really are impossible in any operating system, and for making incorrect claims about Windows and other OSes.

Is it a fairytale thread? Can I wish that Windows came bundled with a burgundy unicorn?

I want an ice cream cone every time I click an OK button too! La la la la la.

I'm sorry but that is the dumbest reason I've heard...explain to me how MS would replace it and also explain how you would fix the myriad of (now broken) Windows apps that will no longer work?

Virtualize it. Any access to the "registry" apart from the OS would redirect all program settings to it's own private data store. Those would then be accesses/loaded/used when the app starts and unloaded when the app is terminated.

Virtualize it. Any access to the "registry" apart from the OS would redirect all program settings to it's own private data store. Those would then be accesses/loaded/used when the app starts and unloaded when the app is terminated.

Nothing wrong with the registry, what you want to implement would break everything, and 'Virtualize' it sounds like you want to add performance overhead.

What format would this "private data store" be in? Are you now just creating a hundred miniature registry hives, one for each application? What is the point? What is the advantage supposed to be?

Personally I think that applications should refrain from storing private configuration data in the registry, they should store it in the roaming/local folder, and only use the registry for system-wide settings (like registering servers), but that has nothing to do with the registry itself. It seems like these complaints almost always boil down to application (ab)use of the registry, rather than the registry itself.

What format would this "private data store" be in? Are you now just creating a hundred miniature registry hives, one for each application? What is the point? What is the advantage supposed to be?

Personally I think that applications should refrain from storing private configuration data in the registry, they should store it in the roaming/local folder, and only use the registry for system-wide settings (like registering servers), but that has nothing to do with the registry itself. It seems like these complaints almost always boil down to application (ab)use of the registry, rather than the registry itself.

+1

Applications can run from config files if it wants too, if developers choose to run it from a registry then it's their fault.

Nothing wrong with the registry, what you want to implement would break everything, and 'Virtualize' it sounds like you want to add performance overhead.

It's called API redirection. An app uses the registry API and instead of writing to the central OS registry it'll write those setting to a private data store. Those can then be loaded and unloaded when needed as the apps are used.

Well, it's to late now for Win7, but for Win8 I'd like to see them go to a micro kernel OS (like the *nix)

why, do you even know what you are saying? By the way, linux and windows are like most modern kernels a mix of monolithic and microkernel design. With the emphasis on monolithic design.

Edited by XerXis
A lot of installer reboots have nothing to do with Windows requirements though. They just reboot because they feel like it. The only place I see where there could be fewer reboots is when it comes to updates. The issue though, is how you update files that are in use. Windows has an extremely modular design with focus on shared components (libraries, servers). You can't replace these if they are in use, you'd have to wait until they unloaded. Some of them never unload until you reboot, because they are always in use. There's also the issue of inter-dependencies. What if you have two components that depend on each other, and only update one of them because the other couldn't be unloaded? You now have a version conflict (at least until the next time the system is rebooted), which can be dangerous.

Exactly. I think most of the restarts from driver installs are more because the company that developed the driver wants to make sure there isn't an issue. It isn't Windows asserting that an update is necessary...

It can't be improved, and there can't be a new version. It already does everything it can. All the restrictions are down to fundamental Windows designs, and there is nothing the program can do about it. The most annoying thing is that the compositing window manager (DWM) only supports one desktop, so you can't have Aero on any of the others. It's just not designed to be used for virtual desktops.

Well, there are some other applications that can do this that are a good deal more feature rich. So I don't know how they did that, but they allow features like dragging applications in new desktops, etc. Last I looked they were rather costly though. So, not sure what's involved, but I keep hoping that perhaps Sysinternals will also find work arounds to these issues. One of the biggest frustrations for me is with regards to things that run at startup like SQL Server. You can't run an application in one of the other desktops that uses SQL Server because it does not support stuff like this... Aero I can live without in the other desktops.

And dual listers so you can have both the source and destination side-by-side in the same window!

OMG, that would be amazing. I would love that. :)

yes i think process explorer of sysinternals must be default task manager.

& then people complained about registry, i think it is the most powerful yet most vulnerable feature of windows. i don't think there could be better alternate to it.

I don't really understand the registry argument myself. I've seen people argue that it should have a more pleasant UI in other threads, and it just seems silly to me. To me the registry SHOULD be a scary place to go... If you make it appealing or less scary looking you will have a lot of people that shouldn't be in the registry making changes and breaking things... My rule has always been: If the registry scares you, or is too complicated for you, you shouldn't be in it... If I don't know what a registry value is for, I'm not touching it... LOL

95% of dell drivers need a reboot after install.

Which sounds like a Dell issue to me. I've noticed that as well, but Windows isn't determining that a reboot is necessary...

Actually, there is a folder in your usenames directory called 'Saved Games'. Microsoft created that ability, but game developers are not using them.

MS's insistence on putting everything on the system drive is really aggravating for anyone that likes to keep their system files and software/data files on separate drives. I read that MS even wants to add a requirement to Games For Windows that GFW certified games can only be installed in Program Files; for security reasons supposedly, I hope it's just a rumour. I'm glad no one is listening to MS because it is a bad idea!

Well, there are some other applications that can do this that are a good deal more feature rich. So I don't know how they did that, but they allow features like dragging applications in new desktops, etc. Last I looked they were rather costly though. So, not sure what's involved, but I keep hoping that perhaps Sysinternals will also find work arounds to these issues.

Those other programs don't actually use multiple desktops, they just have the one and cleverly manipulate it to give the impression that there are more. They do this by doing things like hiding the Windows and task bar buttons that belong to another "desktop" than what is active. This is a rather large hack, and none of them really seem to work quite right.

99% of what you want is technically impossible or would be very unsecure. Also, BSODs help you. They end your session before stuff gets all corrupted. If you want "drivers and codecs like linux" then go use Linux. Drivers need to restart the computer. This isn't specific to Windows for a reason. Continue previous sessions would be a nice one, though, although hibernating works to the same effect, basically. Don't assign a password to your user account if you don't want to deal with the files from previous installs. Simple as that. Microsoft isn't going to remove their security just so YOU don't need to right click and choose "take ownership". Some people like security.

+1 - also the removal of BSOD's would just make the system terrible to use and harder to diagnose.

What format would this "private data store" be in? Are you now just creating a hundred miniature registry hives, one for each application? What is the point? What is the advantage supposed to be?

Personally I think that applications should refrain from storing private configuration data in the registry, they should store it in the roaming/local folder, and only use the registry for system-wide settings (like registering servers), but that has nothing to do with the registry itself. It seems like these complaints almost always boil down to application (ab)use of the registry, rather than the registry itself.

The original idea of the registry was to accumulate all the *.ini files in one location. This idea sounded neat at first but has become something that is more or less a bottleneck to the system. I would much prefer if windows took a linux approach to storing settings etc. It's easy to backup, easy to edit (when necessary) and just seems cleaner.

Having said that, I doubt ms will ever change the way that registries work. They're here to stay but instead of replacing it I wish they would just make it faster.

+1 - also the removal of BSOD's would just make the system terrible to use and harder to diagnose.

I think BSODs should stay too but removing them won't be a problem as long as the log files are easily accessible. Why would it make a system terrible to use? Average user wouldn't know what to do with a BSOD but to restart the computer. Only experts would bother diagnosing it and rather than reading the bsod off the screen they would just read the dump that is made.

They should replace the BSOD with a helpful message along with the location of the dump so the user has some clue of what to do.

The only thing I can think of at the minute would be a 'Calendar' function built into the taskbar clock somehow .. for alarms, notes, schedules .. that sort of thing. Maybe tied into the task scheduler somehow ..

+1. a nice idea.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Thanks
    • I actually got to use one of those so called "backup codes" once. It was for a customer, I choose the backup code option, and by the grace of god, they actually hade them printed out. Imagine my surprise, when after using the backup code, Google then told use we had to enter a code they just sent to the gmail address we currently did not have access to. I was not amused, Google backup codes should be the end all get out of jail free card, because you had to have access to the account to even get them.
    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!