Recommended Posts

Does anyone know why vector scaling with the magnifier for WPF apps was removed?

Under Vista, if you zoomed into any app using WPF, it would scale as a vector, and quite frankly looked awesome. Under 7, it raster scales it, and looks crappy.

Combined with the new magnifier mode, that could have been nice, and a damned good reason to push WPF.

No, it rasterizes before zoom in vista too. And yes, that pretty much ruins one of the coolest things that could have been achieved with WPF :(

It already does vector scaling inside the application with the ViewBox and VisualBrush, why not take it all the way to the OS with zooming and DWM thumbs.

Btw, anyone else thinks the new magnifier is really awkward? It uses some horrible sampling filter making everything really jaggy(if they can't make vector zoom at least use proper scaling!), it zooms by ADDING zoom-percentage instead of multiplying which makes the zoom slower the closer you get, it zooms with fixed steps so you never get the size you want unless you change it to use 25% steps which instead requires you to press zoom 100 times, it's not running all the time so you have to press zoom first to start it and then you can zoom, when it's running the magnifier-glass is in the way and when it's running text-boxes in all apllications start to flicker.

It can't even be compared to the zoom in OSX that actually is usable even if i don't have any problems with my eyes. It's just so convenient to zoom in to make a flashvideo fullscreen, show a text to someone who sits a couple of meters away and stuff like that. In windows when i try the same thing i press win++ and regret what i've done before the magnifier-tool even has finished loading.

Hmm how about something more useful...

Better dual monitor support pl0x?

I would like to natively be able to have different/spanning wallpapers and a taskbar/Superbar that can extend over multiple displays. While Ultramon and DisplayFusion do this it's cumbersome having to have an extra app to do these menial tasks and currently they are incompatible with Aero Peek or the Superbar's icon docking anyway. Furthermore I would like the system tray/clock/Show Desktop button on the opposite corner as the Start Orb rather than in the same monitor and in the middle of the desktop :(

+1 Epic fail on dual monitor support.

I'd still like to see better UI scaling options as well. MMOs have done this for ages and its time that Windows followed suit.

I'd also like to see them adopt Apple's application model of self-contained single files.

An easier backup solution would be nice as well. The space handling right now is atrocious.

No viruses. (They're still there, you still need an anti-virus.)

Cause that is realistic, how about smarter users that know what they're doing? Such as what to click, what websites not to go to, what not to download, etc etc... since viruses are 99% the user's fault.

I haven't ran an antivirus in over 4 years, and you know how many infections my computer has had?

I'd like to see the reboot process happen seperately and much faster so the entire system doesn't have to do a complete recycle startup. Similar to what you see in VMware when rebooting. When I work on computers installing programs I swear I almost fall asleep waiting for the PC's to reboot. I also understand why it has to occur.

An easy way to backup my data. Currently, I have to plug my external drive in and manually select files I need to copy over to my external drive, then I copy them and paste them to the drive. Unless there is another way (?) this is pretty tedious and annoying; it's annoying to the point that I don't backup as often as I should. I don't know how Time Machine works (?) but I've heard it's much better. I know this isn't fully down to the operating system, but I would like my backup process made much easier. Venders selling wireless hardrives would be a start, but something programmed into Windows which could somehow automatically backup my content, to my external drive, would be fantastic :) Unless it is already there and I have missed it? :p

Have you tried "Restore to previous version..."? :) It works much better than it did in Vista. Now I can change a file and immediately open or restore the old version whereas in Vista it wasn't tracked and available for restoration unless backup had run already. I think it backs up the previous versions permanently during the scheduled backups. Also, the action center should notify you if you don't have your backup drive connected when it's time for a pass.

About the bsod, they do help you but id prefer they changed it around now, maybe more user friendly or something.

Actually, considering the stop error gives you all the information you need to prevent future stop errors, it's actually user-friendly when you look at it from that perspective.

Mac OS X's kernel panic looks pretty, but it's useless, as it tells you absolutely nothing. (Except to turn off your computer and start over.)

I would like to see built in PDF support or a Office PDF application simply because Adobe is terrilbe especially with x64 support. I would like built in spell checker support for IE.

to get sued for anti-trust or patent infringement by adobe

See we want the same thing there Calum - easy backup!

Time Machine does just work brilliantly. You load the Time Machine control panel applet, either turn it on or off and specify which volume you want to use as the Time Machine backup device - either an internal disk or external. Then it takes an initial large backup, and subsequently does differential backups every hour. It's totally seamless (apart from, perhaps 5 times in a year of daily use of my Mac that a backup mysteriously failed - forcing it to re-run always worked fine) and I frankly never even noticed it running. And if you've not changed much or just being browsing the net for an hour or so, the differential backup is about 2.0MB so it's done in a matter of seconds.

It's really excellent and I hope that Microsoft can make their backups work as well eventually. I don't think you've missed it - I was using Windows Vista's built in backup solution at work but didn't find it to work quite as well and it's certainly not as idiot proof.

That sounds a lot like the setup for System Restore / Previous Versions on Windows.

post-30311-1251309073.jpg

I do wish that were better integrated with the regular Backup stuff though (for backing up to external drives / network shares / etc).

No viruses. (They're still there, you still need an anti-virus.)

No offense, but I've read your suggestions, and most of them are either ludicrous (manually install all codecs like in Linux, resume session which is exactly what Hibernate is) or impossible (disable BSOD's, no viruses).

It is unlikely that native PDF support will ever materialize in any version of Windows.

First, Adobe would bitch and moan over it: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=2662

Second, Microsoft is attempting (poorly) to launch its XPS format.

I remember in Windows XP, you could rename "Control Panel" but not "Recycle Bin." In Windows 7, this has been reversed, as you can rename "Recycle Bin" but not "Control Panel." Thus, I would like to be able to rename any application shortcut, especially ones that are pinned on the taskbar.

Also, every element on the taskbar should be fully draggable, just like the notification area icons. Why must the Start orb always be in the extreme left corner? I prefer to dock my taskbar to the left side of the screen, and thus I'd prefer to be able to drag the Start orb elsewhere, maybe at the bottom of the screen.

Also, I wish that Microsoft would offer more advanced settings to the Add/Remove Programs manager. I use a third-party application called Revo Uninstaller that not only uninstalls another application, it also finds and deletes all related Registry and preference files. I wish advanced functionality like that would be built into a future version of Windows.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!