Recommended Posts

I really hope the next version Microsoft allows some customizability... even the same amount as Windows XP would be great. It seems they are stripping more control away from us with each OS since then.

I don't find Windows 7 to be any more/less customizable than Windows XP.

Disable BSOD's permanently

How does that make any sense... BSOD is not a feature or something that can be disabled. It's a screen filled with valuable information about a crash. And if a crash does occur, it's most likely your hardware's fault.

Instead you should thank the BSOD'd for helping you troubleshoot your faulty hardware.

I would have like to see run time libraries for the common languages, C++, Visual Basic, .net, Java, PHP, etc. included with the install. Then I would like to see rid of the registry and just go back to good old .ini files or something like. Then have all the installation of an app in it's own folder, instead of spread scatter-gun fashion all over the shop. The C:/windows folder should not be a repository for crap from other places.

We have big hard drives now so space saving via the registry and common dll's and such is not so much of an issue.

Plus if apps are self contained as much as possible nasties like viruses would, while not being eliminated altogether, would be easier to defend against.

I would have like to see run time libraries for the common languages, C++, Visual Basic, .net, Java, PHP, etc. included with the install. Then I would like to see rid of the registry and just go back to good old .ini files or something like. Then have all the installation of an app in it's own folder, instead of spread scatter-gun fashion all over the shop. The C:/windows folder should not be a repository for crap from other places.

We have big hard drives now so space saving via the registry and common dll's and such is not so much of an issue.

Plus if apps are self contained as much as possible nasties like viruses would, while not being eliminated altogether, would be easier to defend against.

http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/...26/6523907.aspx

I would have like to see run time libraries for the common languages, C++, Visual Basic, .net, Java, PHP, etc. included with the install. Then I would like to see rid of the registry and just go back to good old .ini files or something like. Then have all the installation of an app in it's own folder, instead of spread scatter-gun fashion all over the shop. The C:/windows folder should not be a repository for crap from other places.

We have big hard drives now so space saving via the registry and common dll's and such is not so much of an issue.

Plus if apps are self contained as much as possible nasties like viruses would, while not being eliminated altogether, would be easier to defend against.

Why the hell would people want all of them installed? We're trying to get Windows to be lighter, but all you are suggesting is bogging it down with crap I don't actually need, or 80%+ people.

  • 1 month later...

A small UI thing: I wish they had added options for tinkering with the window animations. I'd like to be able to get rid of the open window fade-in animation, but keep the close window fade-out and minimize/maximize animations. The UI would feel snappier if that fade-in was removed.

The only thing I can think of at the minute would be a 'Calendar' function built into the taskbar clock somehow .. for alarms, notes, schedules .. that sort of thing. Maybe tied into the task scheduler somehow ..

They had that in Windows Calendar but it's not there in Live Mail. Besides how would Outlook sell then?

can't believe they never added any aspect ration controls to wmp, how many versions have there been? lots... glad you can remove it in 7. Gone back to using MPC again. That's the only thing I wanted added in 7.

It's there but inaccessible/has very poor discoverability. Go to WMP Options -> Devices -> Display -> Properties. That should be accessible in the context menu.

I'd like to see the return of some customizability of XP:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features_remo...m_Windows_Vista

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features_removed_from_Windows_7

They're dumbing it down one step at a time.

That sounds a lot like the setup for System Restore / Previous Versions on Windows.

post-30311-1251309073.jpg

I do wish that were better integrated with the regular Backup stuff though (for backing up to external drives / network shares / etc).

Shadow Copy is a good feature however Microsoft really needs to push this onto other hdd's either other internal or external drives. As shadow copy doesn't help if the hdd fails, with time machine the backups are made to a separate drive.

MS's insistence on putting everything on the system drive is really aggravating for anyone that likes to keep their system files and software/data files on separate drives. I read that MS even wants to add a requirement to Games For Windows that GFW certified games can only be installed in Program Files; for security reasons supposedly, I hope it's just a rumour. I'm glad no one is listening to MS because it is a bad idea!

For all the documents, music etc folders...

Right click -> properties -> location. Change it to whatever you want....

A small UI thing: I wish they had added options for tinkering with the window animations. I'd like to be able to get rid of the open window fade-in animation, but keep the close window fade-out and minimize/maximize animations. The UI would feel snappier if that fade-in was removed.

Right click my computer -> properties -> advanced system settings -> under the performance section click settings

Right click my computer -> properties -> advanced system settings -> under the performance section click settings

There's nothing in there to let me do this...

A small UI thing: I wish they had added options for tinkering with the window animations. I'd like to be able to get rid of the open window fade-in animation, but keep the close window fade-out and minimize/maximize animations. The UI would feel snappier if that fade-in was removed.

16hksd1.png

This is sort of hard to clarify what I'm looking for here.

Instead of just time.. for once I wish Microsoft would let us implement Action Center, Hidden Icons, Month, THEN date and then time. Not just Action Center, Hidden Icons, then time.

I think it'd be a nice addition.

16hksd1.png

This is sort of hard to clarify what I'm looking for here.

Instead of just time.. for once I wish Microsoft would let us implement Action Center, Hidden Icons, Month, THEN date and then time. Not just Action Center, Hidden Icons, then time.

I think it'd be a nice addition.

They really ought to add that option in Windows 8. With widescreen monitors being the norm these days and the Superbar's default Icon-only look, you have a lot more room for that kind of customization. It's something I suggested earlier in this thread, and those who use T-Clock will know how great it is to have all the information you need about date & time laid out right in front of you without having to hover over.

I think I'm understanding you wrong... T-Clock works in the taskbar (haven't tried on Superbar with Windows 7) without skins by default. It's very customizable as far as setting up its position and the information layout. I'm not aware if it has skin support, but I got it to look native... if that's what you mean by looking like the default skin.

Just use Segoe UI as the font and it'll look like its a native part of Windows.

http://www.stoicjoker.com/TClock/

Get rid of the registry. No other operating system has this file.

didn't think of is but i support, i would prefer if everything would keep its configuration in files, keeps things more neat in my option than one rubbish file that's everything dumped on...

i find it easier to open up a conf file in linux and read how i can change functionality by changing what, than to go to registery, find the software i want to edit and try to understand what each value means

Edited by Matan Mates
Maybe I do have bad luck, but I've seen 3 BSOD's so far with 7.

That's not bad luck; that's either bad drivers or bad hardware. How can you expect any operating system to fix that for you?

Animating Network Icon

+1 to that, brother. Why did they get rid of that? Did someone think it was too distracting? Plus, I'm sorry but the network connection icon looks like a monitor holding a pitchfork. Am I right?

post-427-1255123393.png

  • 5 weeks later...
*face palm*

I'm sorry but that is the dumbest reason I've heard...explain to me how MS would replace it and also explain how you would fix the myriad of (now broken) Windows apps that will no longer work?

Rather quick to throw out the insults? Obviously you've never heard of Unix or Linux. Try reading columnist John C Dvorak's article in the April 2008 PC Magazine and you'll see the logic.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2290313,00.asp

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      569
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!