Inglourious Basterds (2009)


Recommended Posts

It was a fairly good film. While I will not critique the film entirely as I usually do, the most striking point is also its weakest. Despite the entertaining dialogue (with many irrelevant but irreverent parts) that was fantastically done as was the first scene, sometimes it did bore and drag on too long.

I would rate this one 6.5/10.

I enjoyed this film, one of my friends who isn't really into this style didn't get the film, but the rest of us enjoyed the tense scenes, action and the hilarity that ensued from QT's masterpiece.

Col Lans, by far the best character, and when him and 'Aldo' finally meet on screen I couldn't help by laughing at the 'I-talian'. Waltz should definately get an Oscar for this because he played his character perfectly, and I felt Pitt could have been on screen more, but he was still funny when he did. I even found Mike Myers small part to be quite amusing!

I loved seeing Hitler jumping up and down going "NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN"

Waltz should definately get an Oscar for this because he played his character perfectly

+1

If he doesn't get an Oscar for this, then there is something wrong. He played his character brilliantly, the talk in the house at the start was one of the best bits of film I've seen for a long time, so tense with the will he, won't he?

and lol @ Hitler's face getting blown to pieces :p

The way the movie was going for a while i thought it could have been loosly based off of certain things, like a group of jews torturing nazis and the plan to kill all the nazi in the theater, and it just failed horribly.

Then when they start shooting hitler in the face...

  • 3 weeks later...
I ordered this on Blu-ray two days ago - It comes out in the UK on 07/12/2009

I was just reading an article that we'll be getting it 15/12/2009, so yay! :D

The disappointing part is that no one expects a lot of extra features on the first released. Considering how bad off The Weinstein Company is, they are probably going to try and milk as much money out this as possible. So first release will have poor extras and then some time next year, probably a year from theatrical release, they'll release a Director's Cut jam packed full of features.

  • 3 weeks later...

Oh I really liked this. Whilst at this juncture I think it's his best film since... Kill Bill vol. 2, I think repeat viewings are almost sure to make me like the film even more. QT movies are like that. The only glaring thing I didn't really like was how the plot to destroy the Third Reich came together way too easily in the end. Not everything went smoothly, but everything fixed itself too easily.

My favourite chapter is chapter 3 -- the rendezvous in the basement bar. Perfect. And Chapter 1 is the finest Leone sequence Leone never directed.

I think you hit the nail on the head when you said it was possibly his most "polished film". It really shows. His really long single-take steady-cam shot in the foyer of the cinema for example, was amazingly well put together.

And Waltz role was just delicious to watch.

  • 1 month later...
I still think his scene with Aldo, where he's trying to offer his terms of conditional surrender, is his best. The opening scene was brilliant, but this scene shows just how human he is, while stilling being so menacing:

He played his character far better than any other in the film. All of his scenes had a genius twist that makes him totally unpredictable, yet uses humor perfectly in tense situations.

I saw it today...i dont see why people are praising it so much. What is there to like?

Somehow i anticipated something more serious.

The movie is way overrated.

5/10.

Naturally, the more you look into a movie and read reviews before, the more likely you are to head into the theater with higher expectations and then come out of the theater saying it is "overrated." Either this film just doesn't fit your taste or you failed to see the deeper meanings in the scenes. I have to admit, I was not sure myself whether this was worth watching. But I am certainly glad I did.

I saw it today...i dont see why people are praising it so much. What is there to like?

Somehow i anticipated something more serious.

The movie is way overrated.

5/10.

I guess the movie is best enjoyed in the theaters, which it is no longer playing, or when it comes out on DVD or Blu-ray, that isn't available until December 15. I guess you can't fully enjoy a movie off your computer......

I guess the movie is best enjoyed in the theaters, which it is no longer playing, or when it comes out on DVD or Blu-ray, that isn't available until December 15. I guess you can't fully enjoy a movie off your computer......

:D

i watch 90% of movies on my pc, and i enjoy them if they are good, so this has nothing to do with it :p

I like QT's reservoir dogs, and pulp fiction, but kill bill wasnt something to my taste. I guess this isnt either.

SOmehow i dont enjoy watching people being scalped :(

:D

i watch 90% of movies on my pc, and i enjoy them if they are good, so this has nothing to do with it :p

I like QT's reservoir dogs, and pulp fiction, but kill bill wasnt something to my taste. I guess this isnt either.

SOmehow i dont enjoy watching people being scalped :(

Perhaps you aren't in war movies, but this isn't exactly a war type film like Saving Private Ryan (needs to be on blu-ray), but is almost all to do with story about the war.

I thought the film was amazing, and actually enjoyed the entire thing, beginning to end. At times the film is a tad slow, but it isn't about action really, it is all about the story about how the Americans tried techniques to assassinate Hitler in World War II. It also has to do with showing the way Germans portrayed themselves back in WWII, compared to how the rest of the world sees them.

Whether or not this was based on a true story, I thought it was very cool to see tactics used to kill off the worlds most hated man, since other tactics weren't working.

Anyways, not everyone is going to love this film, but this is definitely something I need to purchase on Blu-ray

What I've found interesting is how much my view of this film has actually co-incided with MOST critics.

(In case you missed it, I tend to judge movies very differently than they do)

My ONLY issue with this movie was how little time we had with the Basterds. I guess I was expecting

more Rambo and less of a back-story, dialogue feel. That being said, I still thought it was overall

QT genius and I'll definitely be buying it on Blu-Ray.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      459
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!