Inglourious Basterds (2009)


Recommended Posts

It was a fairly good film. While I will not critique the film entirely as I usually do, the most striking point is also its weakest. Despite the entertaining dialogue (with many irrelevant but irreverent parts) that was fantastically done as was the first scene, sometimes it did bore and drag on too long.

I would rate this one 6.5/10.

I enjoyed this film, one of my friends who isn't really into this style didn't get the film, but the rest of us enjoyed the tense scenes, action and the hilarity that ensued from QT's masterpiece.

Col Lans, by far the best character, and when him and 'Aldo' finally meet on screen I couldn't help by laughing at the 'I-talian'. Waltz should definately get an Oscar for this because he played his character perfectly, and I felt Pitt could have been on screen more, but he was still funny when he did. I even found Mike Myers small part to be quite amusing!

I loved seeing Hitler jumping up and down going "NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN"

Waltz should definately get an Oscar for this because he played his character perfectly

+1

If he doesn't get an Oscar for this, then there is something wrong. He played his character brilliantly, the talk in the house at the start was one of the best bits of film I've seen for a long time, so tense with the will he, won't he?

and lol @ Hitler's face getting blown to pieces :p

The way the movie was going for a while i thought it could have been loosly based off of certain things, like a group of jews torturing nazis and the plan to kill all the nazi in the theater, and it just failed horribly.

Then when they start shooting hitler in the face...

  • 3 weeks later...
I ordered this on Blu-ray two days ago - It comes out in the UK on 07/12/2009

I was just reading an article that we'll be getting it 15/12/2009, so yay! :D

The disappointing part is that no one expects a lot of extra features on the first released. Considering how bad off The Weinstein Company is, they are probably going to try and milk as much money out this as possible. So first release will have poor extras and then some time next year, probably a year from theatrical release, they'll release a Director's Cut jam packed full of features.

  • 3 weeks later...

Oh I really liked this. Whilst at this juncture I think it's his best film since... Kill Bill vol. 2, I think repeat viewings are almost sure to make me like the film even more. QT movies are like that. The only glaring thing I didn't really like was how the plot to destroy the Third Reich came together way too easily in the end. Not everything went smoothly, but everything fixed itself too easily.

My favourite chapter is chapter 3 -- the rendezvous in the basement bar. Perfect. And Chapter 1 is the finest Leone sequence Leone never directed.

I think you hit the nail on the head when you said it was possibly his most "polished film". It really shows. His really long single-take steady-cam shot in the foyer of the cinema for example, was amazingly well put together.

And Waltz role was just delicious to watch.

  • 1 month later...
I still think his scene with Aldo, where he's trying to offer his terms of conditional surrender, is his best. The opening scene was brilliant, but this scene shows just how human he is, while stilling being so menacing:

He played his character far better than any other in the film. All of his scenes had a genius twist that makes him totally unpredictable, yet uses humor perfectly in tense situations.

I saw it today...i dont see why people are praising it so much. What is there to like?

Somehow i anticipated something more serious.

The movie is way overrated.

5/10.

Naturally, the more you look into a movie and read reviews before, the more likely you are to head into the theater with higher expectations and then come out of the theater saying it is "overrated." Either this film just doesn't fit your taste or you failed to see the deeper meanings in the scenes. I have to admit, I was not sure myself whether this was worth watching. But I am certainly glad I did.

I saw it today...i dont see why people are praising it so much. What is there to like?

Somehow i anticipated something more serious.

The movie is way overrated.

5/10.

I guess the movie is best enjoyed in the theaters, which it is no longer playing, or when it comes out on DVD or Blu-ray, that isn't available until December 15. I guess you can't fully enjoy a movie off your computer......

I guess the movie is best enjoyed in the theaters, which it is no longer playing, or when it comes out on DVD or Blu-ray, that isn't available until December 15. I guess you can't fully enjoy a movie off your computer......

:D

i watch 90% of movies on my pc, and i enjoy them if they are good, so this has nothing to do with it :p

I like QT's reservoir dogs, and pulp fiction, but kill bill wasnt something to my taste. I guess this isnt either.

SOmehow i dont enjoy watching people being scalped :(

:D

i watch 90% of movies on my pc, and i enjoy them if they are good, so this has nothing to do with it :p

I like QT's reservoir dogs, and pulp fiction, but kill bill wasnt something to my taste. I guess this isnt either.

SOmehow i dont enjoy watching people being scalped :(

Perhaps you aren't in war movies, but this isn't exactly a war type film like Saving Private Ryan (needs to be on blu-ray), but is almost all to do with story about the war.

I thought the film was amazing, and actually enjoyed the entire thing, beginning to end. At times the film is a tad slow, but it isn't about action really, it is all about the story about how the Americans tried techniques to assassinate Hitler in World War II. It also has to do with showing the way Germans portrayed themselves back in WWII, compared to how the rest of the world sees them.

Whether or not this was based on a true story, I thought it was very cool to see tactics used to kill off the worlds most hated man, since other tactics weren't working.

Anyways, not everyone is going to love this film, but this is definitely something I need to purchase on Blu-ray

What I've found interesting is how much my view of this film has actually co-incided with MOST critics.

(In case you missed it, I tend to judge movies very differently than they do)

My ONLY issue with this movie was how little time we had with the Basterds. I guess I was expecting

more Rambo and less of a back-story, dialogue feel. That being said, I still thought it was overall

QT genius and I'll definitely be buying it on Blu-Ray.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!