• 0

[PHP] eregi replacement


Question

I've been using this code to validate user names. It only allows 0-9, a-z, A-Z, spaces...

if ( ! eregi ( "^[0-9A-Z_[:space:]]{1,}$", $username ) )

But now, in PHP 5.3 the ereg and eregi functions are deprecated and will be deleted in PHP 6.0.

How can I do this without eregi?

Edited by MNunes2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/815802-php-eregi-replacement/
Share on other sites

15 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

you're close. preg_* functions use perl regular expressions so they have a little extra syntax to them.

preg_match("/^[0-9a-z_ ]+$/i", &username)

mainly the starting and ending slash. the letter 'i' after the ending slash says "do a case insensitive search". that way you can remove the extra A-Z character class.

  • 0
  nvme said:
you're close. preg_* functions use perl regular expressions so they have a little extra syntax to them.
preg_match("/^[0-9a-z_ ]+$/i", &username)

mainly the starting and ending slash. the letter 'i' after the ending slash says "do a case insensitive search". that way you can remove the extra A-Z character class.

And what does this +$ and this ^ mean? And where can I learn more about this?

  • 0

a carrot (^) means to assert position at the beginning of the string. so basically.. this pattern needs to start at the very beginning of the string.

the dollar sign ($) means assert position at the end of the string. so the strings needs to end with this pattern as well.

the stuff between the square braces are known as a character class. a group of characters that must exist (in this case). if you left the plus off after the character class then that character class would only be required to match one character. the plus means match at least one of the characters in the character class.. but the more it finds in next to each other the more it will match.

so when you put it all together it says that some string must start with and end with some number, letter, space, or any of the symbols (&, #, _) and it must exist at least once but can exist as many times as possible.

if you leave the carrot or dollar sign off of the expression then a pattern could be satisfied anywhere in the string and would be considered a match. for example.. if you used the pattern "[0-9a-z_ ]+" and tested it against the string "abc;.123" it would match two patterns: "abc" and "123". using the dollar sign and carrot it would start matching and get to "abc" then it would see a semicolon and because a semicolon isnt in the character class the pattern fails because the entire string wasnt the match for the pattern.

the key thing to remember is that a regular expression will look for any match that it can find if you dont use constraints like these.

  • 0
  nvme said:
a carrot (^) means to assert position at the beginning of the string. so basically.. this pattern needs to start at the very beginning of the string.

the dollar sign ($) means assert position at the end of the string. so the strings needs to end with this pattern as well.

the stuff between the square braces are known as a character class. a group of characters that must exist (in this case). if you left the plus off after the character class then that character class would only be required to match one character. the plus means match at least one of the characters in the character class.. but the more it finds in next to each other the more it will match.

so when you put it all together it says that some string must start with and end with some number, letter, space, or any of the symbols (&, #, _) and it must exist at least once but can exist as many times as possible.

if you leave the carrot or dollar sign off of the expression then a pattern could be satisfied anywhere in the string and would be considered a match. for example.. if you used the pattern "[0-9a-z_ ]+" and tested it against the string "abc;.123" it would match two patterns: "abc" and "123". using the dollar sign and carrot it would start matching and get to "abc" then it would see a semicolon and because a semicolon isnt in the character class the pattern fails because the entire string wasnt the match for the pattern.

the key thing to remember is that a regular expression will look for any match that it can find if you dont use constraints like these.

It's caret. lol

  • 0
  Popcorned1 said:
It's caret. lol

:rofl: lol my fingers must be hungry

  MNunes2 said:
It seems I will have to learn a lot about this function since ereg functions wont be available anymore. :-( Thanks for the information.

i learned mostly from using regex buddy and reading their docs on their site. i think it's a great app for easing into regular expressions and testing/debugged really complex ones even after you get the hang of it.

http://www.regexbuddy.com/regex.html

  • 0

Hi guys,

been a few years since i've used PHP and was testing out some old stuff I had, and came across the depreciated ereg function.

I was using:

if (ereg('^[a-zA-Z0-9_\.\-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9\-]+\.[a-zA-Z0-9\-\.]+$', $address))

which I picked up form somewhere, have no idea how it works, and so have no idea how to turn it into preg_match.

Anyone lend a hand? I tried some solutions already in the thread but didn't have much luck.

My function looks like:

function valid_email($address)

{

// check an email address is possibly valid

if (ereg('^[a-zA-Z0-9_\.\-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9\-]+\.[a-zA-Z0-9\-\.]+$', $address))

return true;

else

return false;

}

  • 0
  On 24/08/2009 at 14:28, Swift-R said:

I've been using this code to validate user names. It only allows 0-9, a-z, A-Z, spaces...

if ( ! eregi ( "^[0-9A-Z_[:space:]]{1,}$", $username ) )

But now, in PHP 5.3 the ereg and eregi functions are deprecated and will be deleted in PHP 6.0.

How can I do this without eregi?

I've been using the following code to validate Xbox Live Gamertags in a Stats application. (which is A-Z, a-z, 0-9, spaces)

preg_replace('/[^a-zA-Z0-9\s]/', '', $username);

or if you have more descriptive stuff (like can't start/end with space, can't have 2 spaces in a row, can't start in a number, 15 chars long)

preg_replace('/^(?=.{1,15}$)[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*(?: [a-zA-Z0-9]+)*$/', '', $username);

  • 0
  On 02/02/2011 at 19:02, Lexx87 said:

Hi guys,

been a few years since i've used PHP and was testing out some old stuff I had, and came across the depreciated ereg function.

I was using:

if (ereg('^[a-zA-Z0-9_\.\-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9\-]+\.[a-zA-Z0-9\-\.]+$', $address))

which I picked up form somewhere, have no idea how it works, and so have no idea how to turn it into preg_match.

Anyone lend a hand? I tried some solutions already in the thread but didn't have much luck.

My function looks like:

function valid_email($address)

{

// check an email address is possibly valid

if (ereg('^[a-zA-Z0-9_\.\-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9\-]+\.[a-zA-Z0-9\-\.]+$', $address))

return true;

else

return false;

}

Seeing as you're using newer PHP, I'd suggest filter_var

  • 0

If you want to learn about regular expressions then I would suggest reading up on the Perl Regex man page.

A more user friendly website for learning about regex is http://www.regular-expressions.info/, but this teaches PCRE (Perl Compatible Regular Expressions). As the name suggests the two are mostly the same, but there are some minor inconsistencies.

  • 0
  On 02/02/2011 at 19:08, Xerax said:

I've been using the following code to validate Xbox Live Gamertags in a Stats application. (which is A-Z, a-z, 0-9, spaces)

preg_replace('/[^a-zA-Z0-9\s]/', '', $username);

\s matches all whitespace, not just spaces. It will also match tabs, line feeds, carriage returns, which are clearly not allowed in XBL gamertags :p

If you want to match only spaces then you should use [^a-zA-Z0-9 ].

Also, rather than match a-zA-Z you could use the /i case-insensitive modifier. With the above changes, the final regex would become:

preg_replace('/[^a-z0-9 ]/i','',$username);

Or if you prefer, you can use \d instead of 0-9:

preg_replace('/[^a-z\d ]/i','',$username);

  • 0
  On 02/02/2011 at 19:02, Lexx87 said:

Hi guys,

been a few years since i've used PHP and was testing out some old stuff I had, and came across the depreciated ereg function.

I was using:

if (ereg('^[a-zA-Z0-9_\.\-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9\-]+\.[a-zA-Z0-9\-\.]+$', $address))

which I picked up form somewhere, have no idea how it works, and so have no idea how to turn it into preg_match.

Anyone lend a hand? I tried some solutions already in the thread but didn't have much luck.

My function looks like:

function valid_email($address)

{

// check an email address is possibly valid

if (ereg('^[a-zA-Z0-9_\.\-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9\-]+\.[a-zA-Z0-9\-\.]+$', $address))

return true;

else

return false;

}

function valid_email($address)
{
  // check an email address is possibly valid
  return (preg_match('/^[a-z\d_\.\-]+@([a-z\d\-]+)(?:\.(?1))+$/i',$address)) ? true : false;
}

Your original regex matched things like "my@email....com" which is clearly not a valid email address. This one will not match that.

I'm not a PHP programmer so the above may not work if I've got any of the PHP syntax wrong, but I've tried out the regex in another language and it seems to work :)

Edit:

In fact, if top level domains only ever go two levels deep, like ".co.uk," then this regex is probably more appropriate:

function valid_email($address)
{
  // check an email address is possibly valid
  return (preg_match('/^[a-z\d_\.\-]+@([a-z\d\-]+)(?:\.(?1)){1,2}$/i',$address)) ? true : false;
}

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And I should hope none will. I don't want to walk ouside to have some randome AI drive over me and mine. Not that I want a person to do it either but I want there to be an actual person who takes responsibility of their actions instead of relinquishing control to a machine. In some highways I can accept self-driving, but even then there should be some kind of dead man switch etc. that actually monitors the drivers status.
    • No thank you. I want to drive myself, and not just because I don't trust a machine or whatever – I like driving, and I like doing it with a manual car without lane guidance and all other "driver assists". I wven rarely use cruise control. I went through and paid for to have a license to that allows me to do it, and do it responsibly instead of relinquishing control to a machine. I currently drive a van for work in a city, something like 200 km/day. If we everything is automated and computers decide everything for us, the dumber people will get since they don't have to bother thinking for themselves nor do they have to take responsibility for themselves since "it wasn't me, it was the machine" will be their future defence for everything. Soon, Neowin's writers will be out of a job because AI can do it just fine and it doesn't need pay. Wikipedia – a free service with voluntary writers – just started replacing real people with AI, and had to shut it down (at least for now). Lets let ai AI and those that run it (or rather run them) the keys the the world and watch it burn because no one is able to actually do anything without some AI assistant telling them what to do (driving included). What a world!
    • I’m sure in the last 12 months there’s been more air disasters
    • And it will get even wors the more automation and other features limiting driver interaction there are in never cars. The same also applies to many other things these days than driving. Let's make people dumber by not educating them and building things in a way where they do everything for people! Welcome to the future, where you don't have to think for yourself! Welcome to idiocrazy!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      POR2GAL4EVER earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Orpheus13 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Orpheus13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Orpheus13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      serfegyed earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      535
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      249
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      178
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      166
    5. 5
      Xenon
      123
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!