[Rumour] Snow Leopard Has Hidden Antivirus Talents


Recommended Posts

500x_snowav.jpg

Well, this is int-er-est-ing: Early testers have come across what looks like a new antivirus function within Snow Leopard. Or to put it another way, Macs don't need antivirus! Wait.

The new feature behaves like a cross between a traditional antivirus tool and the "Are you sure you want to open this?" warnings already present in Leopard. I doubt it's doing any real-time heuristic scanning and it's definitely not running as a visible app in the OS, but if it's checking .PKG and .DMG files for malware before you run or mount them, well, that sounds an awful lot like what your average Symantec, AVG or Kapersky product is intended to do.

The first report came from the Intego blog, (they make Mac antivirus software) and it's been corroborated by Snow Leopard testers over at the MacRumors forums. We'll try to test this one out as best we can, but it's looking like Apple may have slipped this ever-so-slightly unflattering feature into their new OS under the radar.

souricon.gif News source: Gizmodo

Does anyone else find this ironic (if true), considering what Apple's marketing department focused on in the latest 'Get a Mac' ads?

Disclaimer: This post was written on a Mac, running OS X 10.5.

Hardly ironic. They're keeping true to their word by preventing any possible malware from reaching your computer in the first place. It's essentially a re-worded confirmation box for when you run a new program, but made more focused on preventing malware to stop people mindlessly clicking 'run' when the box pops up.

Maybe like UAC, or if not once again Apple allowed to bundle what it pleases in to its OS.

But basic Unix password prompts are already very similar to UAC.

As stated, this isn't really anything new at all, just your typical password prompt, but reworded to call attention to any potential malware you might be installing on your system.

Very good move. This is a message warns the user of what they are installing. There are too many people that will give permissions to just anything these days.

Edit: Pretty much summed up by Quillz. You'd still need an account with SU privileges and would still need to type your password for something like this to work.

Well, this is int-er-est-ing: Early testers have come across what looks like a new antivirus function within Snow Leopard. Or to put it another way, Macs don't need antivirus! Wait.

Does anyone else find this ironic (if true), considering what Apple's marketing department focused on in the latest 'Get a Mac' ads?

Disclaimer: This post was written on a Mac, running OS X 10.5.

I am running 10A432 and I see nothing resembling AV software at all.

By the way, this build is full of WIN.

/System/Library/CoreServices/CoreTypes.bundle/Contents/Resources/XProtect.plist

Contains just the two most active trojans, the DNS changer one and the one bundled with the pirated iWork.

Nice find. I don't use OSX but it's still interesting to know.

Ah so Apple can bundle antivirus software with their OS but Microsoft can't (in Europe)

Because Apple, for whatever reason, isn't considered to have a monopoly.

Also, this isn't really anti-virus software at all. It's just a reworded standard password prompt that simply uses a blacklist, similar to a phishing filter in a web browser.

I notice a lot of people are saying "It's just reworded" or "It's UAC".... Am I the only one that noticed the dialog says "It contains the OSX.RSPlug.A malware"?

It is specically saying "It contains", not "It may contain", not "There is a chance this may contain", but simply stating that it does, indeed, contain malware. If Apple just said that every thing you download specifically contains malware, that would cause all sorts of problems and backlash. It has to either be scanning or using some kind of filter/blacklist/analyzer to detect malware.

I notice a lot of people are saying "It's just reworded" or "It's UAC".... Am I the only one that noticed the dialog says "It contains the OSX.RSPlug.A malware"?

It is specically saying "It contains", not "It may contain", not "There is a chance this may contain", but simply stating that it does, indeed, contain malware. If Apple just said that every thing you download specifically contains malware, that would cause all sorts of problems and backlash. It has to either be scanning or using some kind of filter/blacklist/analyzer to detect malware.

I think it's using a blacklist, and I'd imagine it's something that can and will be updated in 10.6.x builds.

Hardly ironic. They're keeping true to their word by preventing any possible malware from reaching your computer in the first place. It's essentially a re-worded confirmation box for when you run a new program, but made more focused on preventing malware to stop people mindlessly clicking 'run' when the box pops up.

So wait, when Apple embeds an antivirus checking in the OS it's awesome but when you can choose what antivirus you want to install on Windows than it's PC being hit with viruses and it's ridiculous. GOT IT!

This is the same thing as Microsoft Security Essentials only done Apple way, meaning it's "hush hush" and again closed up and embedded in the OS.

Smells like same crap to me if you ask.

Ah so Apple can bundle antivirus software with their OS but Microsoft can't (in Europe)

Let's just be clear this is not Antivirus software.

  • It does not actively scan the systems Hard Disk or Memory
  • It is not a separate application
  • It does not detect Viruses or Worms

What it does do is check the contents of a mounted disk image before it opens it and checks for two very specific files.

To call this an Antivirus is a huge stretch. It isn't even comparable to Windows Defender.

Let's just be clear this is not Antivirus software.

  • It does not actively scan the systems Hard Disk or Memory
  • It is not a separate application
  • It does not detect Viruses or Worms

What it does do is check the contents of a mounted disk image before it opens it and checks for two very specific files.

To call this an Antivirus is a huge stretch. It isn't even comparable to Windows Defender.

Well it is an antivirus as long as it checks the contents of the files and looks for viruses, thus the name Anti-virus. You don't have to have antivirus resident in memory in Windows either, but you apps do because they want to make sure that they prevent action even if you ran the file.

Norton AntiVirus only runs in memory on my computer to check for emails too (which will undoubtedly happen on OSX if it hasn't already). It's not differnet than AV apps on Windows checking in zip/rar archives and comparing it to the library of viruses. If anything the necessity due to Windows being highly targeted system means that the preventive measures and libraries or viruses are much wider and the heuristic methods of catching viruses have improved, something that OSX is yet to face.

Edited by Boz
Well it is an antivirus as long as it checks the contents of the files. You don't have to have antivirus resident in windows in Windows either, but you apps do because they want to make sure that they prevent action even if you ran the file.

Norton AntiVirus only runs in memory on my computer to check for emails too (which will undoubtedly happen on OSX if it hasn't already). It's not differnet than AV apps on Windows checking in zip/rar archives.

It doesn't even check for or remove Viruses. Since when did an Anti-Virus no longer detect or remove Viruses?

And in-fact this doesn't remove any type of file. It does a very rudimentary check and tells the user. That is it.

Possibly related..

http://developer.apple.com/releasenotes/Ma...MacOSX10_5.html

Quarantine

Applications that download files from the Internet or receive files from external sources (such as email attachments) can use the Quarantine feature to provide a first line of defense against malicious software such as Trojan horses. When an application receives an unknown file, it should add quarantine attributes to the file using new functions found in Launch Services. The attributes associate basic information with the file, such as its type, when it was received, and the URL from which it came. When the user tries to open a file that has quarantine attributes associated with it, Mac OS X inspects the file and automatically prevents known malicious files from being opened. For other files, the system asks the user what to do about the file, providing the user with information found in the quarantine attributes. If the user approves the opening of the file, the quarantine for that file is lifted.

If you are developing a web browser or email program, or if your software somehow deals with files from unknown sources, you should use the Quarantine feature as part of your program?s basic security procedures. Quarantine is part of the Launch Services API, which is itself part of the Core Services framework. For more information about the Quarantine API, see the LSQuarantine.h header file in that framework.

It doesn't even check for or remove Viruses. Since when did an Anti-Virus no longer detect or remove Viruses?

And in-fact this doesn't remove any type of file. It does a very rudimentary check and tells the user. That is it.

Well that just makes it a bad anti-virus not a non-anti virus. The fact that it checks against the library of viruses to make sure you didn't catch is the definition of anti-virus program. That's how Windows anti-virus programs work too. They check your files and archives to make sure you don't have a known virus but also include a smarter heuristic methods that help prevent from those viruses that are unknown. Of course, if you are infected on OSX I'm not sure what you are to do. Reinstall the OS?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!