[Rumour] Snow Leopard Has Hidden Antivirus Talents


Recommended Posts

500x_snowav.jpg

Well, this is int-er-est-ing: Early testers have come across what looks like a new antivirus function within Snow Leopard. Or to put it another way, Macs don't need antivirus! Wait.

The new feature behaves like a cross between a traditional antivirus tool and the "Are you sure you want to open this?" warnings already present in Leopard. I doubt it's doing any real-time heuristic scanning and it's definitely not running as a visible app in the OS, but if it's checking .PKG and .DMG files for malware before you run or mount them, well, that sounds an awful lot like what your average Symantec, AVG or Kapersky product is intended to do.

The first report came from the Intego blog, (they make Mac antivirus software) and it's been corroborated by Snow Leopard testers over at the MacRumors forums. We'll try to test this one out as best we can, but it's looking like Apple may have slipped this ever-so-slightly unflattering feature into their new OS under the radar.

souricon.gif News source: Gizmodo

Does anyone else find this ironic (if true), considering what Apple's marketing department focused on in the latest 'Get a Mac' ads?

Disclaimer: This post was written on a Mac, running OS X 10.5.

Hardly ironic. They're keeping true to their word by preventing any possible malware from reaching your computer in the first place. It's essentially a re-worded confirmation box for when you run a new program, but made more focused on preventing malware to stop people mindlessly clicking 'run' when the box pops up.

Maybe like UAC, or if not once again Apple allowed to bundle what it pleases in to its OS.

But basic Unix password prompts are already very similar to UAC.

As stated, this isn't really anything new at all, just your typical password prompt, but reworded to call attention to any potential malware you might be installing on your system.

Very good move. This is a message warns the user of what they are installing. There are too many people that will give permissions to just anything these days.

Edit: Pretty much summed up by Quillz. You'd still need an account with SU privileges and would still need to type your password for something like this to work.

Well, this is int-er-est-ing: Early testers have come across what looks like a new antivirus function within Snow Leopard. Or to put it another way, Macs don't need antivirus! Wait.

Does anyone else find this ironic (if true), considering what Apple's marketing department focused on in the latest 'Get a Mac' ads?

Disclaimer: This post was written on a Mac, running OS X 10.5.

I am running 10A432 and I see nothing resembling AV software at all.

By the way, this build is full of WIN.

/System/Library/CoreServices/CoreTypes.bundle/Contents/Resources/XProtect.plist

Contains just the two most active trojans, the DNS changer one and the one bundled with the pirated iWork.

Nice find. I don't use OSX but it's still interesting to know.

Ah so Apple can bundle antivirus software with their OS but Microsoft can't (in Europe)

Because Apple, for whatever reason, isn't considered to have a monopoly.

Also, this isn't really anti-virus software at all. It's just a reworded standard password prompt that simply uses a blacklist, similar to a phishing filter in a web browser.

I notice a lot of people are saying "It's just reworded" or "It's UAC".... Am I the only one that noticed the dialog says "It contains the OSX.RSPlug.A malware"?

It is specically saying "It contains", not "It may contain", not "There is a chance this may contain", but simply stating that it does, indeed, contain malware. If Apple just said that every thing you download specifically contains malware, that would cause all sorts of problems and backlash. It has to either be scanning or using some kind of filter/blacklist/analyzer to detect malware.

I notice a lot of people are saying "It's just reworded" or "It's UAC".... Am I the only one that noticed the dialog says "It contains the OSX.RSPlug.A malware"?

It is specically saying "It contains", not "It may contain", not "There is a chance this may contain", but simply stating that it does, indeed, contain malware. If Apple just said that every thing you download specifically contains malware, that would cause all sorts of problems and backlash. It has to either be scanning or using some kind of filter/blacklist/analyzer to detect malware.

I think it's using a blacklist, and I'd imagine it's something that can and will be updated in 10.6.x builds.

Hardly ironic. They're keeping true to their word by preventing any possible malware from reaching your computer in the first place. It's essentially a re-worded confirmation box for when you run a new program, but made more focused on preventing malware to stop people mindlessly clicking 'run' when the box pops up.

So wait, when Apple embeds an antivirus checking in the OS it's awesome but when you can choose what antivirus you want to install on Windows than it's PC being hit with viruses and it's ridiculous. GOT IT!

This is the same thing as Microsoft Security Essentials only done Apple way, meaning it's "hush hush" and again closed up and embedded in the OS.

Smells like same crap to me if you ask.

Ah so Apple can bundle antivirus software with their OS but Microsoft can't (in Europe)

Let's just be clear this is not Antivirus software.

  • It does not actively scan the systems Hard Disk or Memory
  • It is not a separate application
  • It does not detect Viruses or Worms

What it does do is check the contents of a mounted disk image before it opens it and checks for two very specific files.

To call this an Antivirus is a huge stretch. It isn't even comparable to Windows Defender.

Let's just be clear this is not Antivirus software.

  • It does not actively scan the systems Hard Disk or Memory
  • It is not a separate application
  • It does not detect Viruses or Worms

What it does do is check the contents of a mounted disk image before it opens it and checks for two very specific files.

To call this an Antivirus is a huge stretch. It isn't even comparable to Windows Defender.

Well it is an antivirus as long as it checks the contents of the files and looks for viruses, thus the name Anti-virus. You don't have to have antivirus resident in memory in Windows either, but you apps do because they want to make sure that they prevent action even if you ran the file.

Norton AntiVirus only runs in memory on my computer to check for emails too (which will undoubtedly happen on OSX if it hasn't already). It's not differnet than AV apps on Windows checking in zip/rar archives and comparing it to the library of viruses. If anything the necessity due to Windows being highly targeted system means that the preventive measures and libraries or viruses are much wider and the heuristic methods of catching viruses have improved, something that OSX is yet to face.

Edited by Boz
Well it is an antivirus as long as it checks the contents of the files. You don't have to have antivirus resident in windows in Windows either, but you apps do because they want to make sure that they prevent action even if you ran the file.

Norton AntiVirus only runs in memory on my computer to check for emails too (which will undoubtedly happen on OSX if it hasn't already). It's not differnet than AV apps on Windows checking in zip/rar archives.

It doesn't even check for or remove Viruses. Since when did an Anti-Virus no longer detect or remove Viruses?

And in-fact this doesn't remove any type of file. It does a very rudimentary check and tells the user. That is it.

Possibly related..

http://developer.apple.com/releasenotes/Ma...MacOSX10_5.html

Quarantine

Applications that download files from the Internet or receive files from external sources (such as email attachments) can use the Quarantine feature to provide a first line of defense against malicious software such as Trojan horses. When an application receives an unknown file, it should add quarantine attributes to the file using new functions found in Launch Services. The attributes associate basic information with the file, such as its type, when it was received, and the URL from which it came. When the user tries to open a file that has quarantine attributes associated with it, Mac OS X inspects the file and automatically prevents known malicious files from being opened. For other files, the system asks the user what to do about the file, providing the user with information found in the quarantine attributes. If the user approves the opening of the file, the quarantine for that file is lifted.

If you are developing a web browser or email program, or if your software somehow deals with files from unknown sources, you should use the Quarantine feature as part of your program?s basic security procedures. Quarantine is part of the Launch Services API, which is itself part of the Core Services framework. For more information about the Quarantine API, see the LSQuarantine.h header file in that framework.

It doesn't even check for or remove Viruses. Since when did an Anti-Virus no longer detect or remove Viruses?

And in-fact this doesn't remove any type of file. It does a very rudimentary check and tells the user. That is it.

Well that just makes it a bad anti-virus not a non-anti virus. The fact that it checks against the library of viruses to make sure you didn't catch is the definition of anti-virus program. That's how Windows anti-virus programs work too. They check your files and archives to make sure you don't have a known virus but also include a smarter heuristic methods that help prevent from those viruses that are unknown. Of course, if you are infected on OSX I'm not sure what you are to do. Reinstall the OS?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!