[Rumour] Snow Leopard Has Hidden Antivirus Talents


Recommended Posts

Well that just makes it a bad anti-virus not a non-anti virus. The fact that it checks against the library of viruses to make sure you didn't catch is the definition of anti-virus program. That's how Windows anti-virus programs work too. They check your files and archives to make sure you don't have a known virus but also include a smarter heuristic methods that help prevent from those viruses that are unknown. Of course, if you are infected on OSX I'm not sure what you are to do. Reinstall the OS?

If it doesn't check for or remove viruses you cannot call this an Anti-Virus. It is at most an Anti-Malware. Which is a seperate type of application.

If it doesn't check for or remove viruses you cannot call this an Anti-Virus. It is at most an Anti-Malware. Which is a seperate type of application.

Removal doesn't necessarily need to be included to be called an anti-virus. It only means that you are screwed if you get it. How is it not checking? It checks the contents of the file (archive) DMG and checks the code of the files to make sure you don't have the malicious code and then compares to their library and pops a warning that you are infected. That's called a check to me.

I'd like more explanation on differences between anti-virus and anti-malware. I'm pretty sure it's the same thing only malware is a broader term.

Malware, short for malicious software, is software designed to infiltrate a computer without the owner's informed consent. The expression is a general term used by computer professionals to mean a variety of forms of hostile, intrusive, or annoying software or program code.[1] The term "computer virus" is sometimes used as a catch-all phrase to include all types of malware, including true viruses.
It only checks for 2 files. I could write an Apple Script to do the same exact thing, did I just make an Anti-Virus? By your definition, yes.

Well what would you put in that script? and how would you identify that the code inside the DMG is indeed a virus. The fact that you have to write a code to check every file and then compare it to your active list of viruses that are already found is an anti-virus IMO. I don't know what else to call it. The fact that it's very basic doesn't change the fact that it will check every file inside and out to locate the malicious code.

Well what would you put in that script? and how would you identify that the code inside the DMG is indeed a virus. The fact that you have to write a code to check every file and then compare it to your active list of viruses that are already found is an anti-virus IMO. I don't know what else to call it. The fact that it's very basic doesn't change the fact that it will check every file inside and out to locate the malicious code.

Ok. By your definition its an anti-virus. I completely disagree.

Hardly ironic. They're keeping true to their word by preventing any possible malware from reaching your computer in the first place. It's essentially a re-worded confirmation box for when you run a new program, but made more focused on preventing malware to stop people mindlessly clicking 'run' when the box pops up.

Umm, isn't that what Kapersky/McAfee/Symantec/Microsoft do already? They're keeping true to their by preventing any possible malware from reaching your computer, but people will still click that "Open" button anyway, so it's really just the same. It offers the same amount of protection, by relying on common sense.

Anyway, the blacklisting is a good idea to a degree, but only if it's kept up-to-date.

so your comparing UAC that in Vista poped up everytime you run a program ( still pops up in 7 for me when i want to play a game ), or want to change a setting, to OSX that only pops up when something tried to access something that is locked ( user set ), or modify a system setting, and IN THIS CASE, flag's a virus/trojan

good comparison, their so alike

It is irony that Apple used to have one of the ads spreading lies about Vista's UAC. Now they are following the same boat, so pathetic.
It is irony that Apple used to have one of the ads spreading lies about Vista's UAC. Now they are following the same boat, so pathetic.

This has absolutely nothing to do with UAC. You apparently don't know what irony is either. You sound like a very misinformed person.

Checking DMGs for a couple of trojans that were going around in pirated software is hardly any kind of antivirus software. We'll probably never hear about it again.

This has absolutely nothing to do with UAC. You apparently don't know what irony is either. You sound like a very misinformed person.

Checking DMGs for a couple of trojans that were going around in pirated software is hardly any kind of antivirus software. We'll probably never hear about it again.

And that is different from checking for a few thousand trojans, how?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!