[Rumour] Snow Leopard Has Hidden Antivirus Talents


Recommended Posts

Well that just makes it a bad anti-virus not a non-anti virus. The fact that it checks against the library of viruses to make sure you didn't catch is the definition of anti-virus program. That's how Windows anti-virus programs work too. They check your files and archives to make sure you don't have a known virus but also include a smarter heuristic methods that help prevent from those viruses that are unknown. Of course, if you are infected on OSX I'm not sure what you are to do. Reinstall the OS?

If it doesn't check for or remove viruses you cannot call this an Anti-Virus. It is at most an Anti-Malware. Which is a seperate type of application.

If it doesn't check for or remove viruses you cannot call this an Anti-Virus. It is at most an Anti-Malware. Which is a seperate type of application.

Removal doesn't necessarily need to be included to be called an anti-virus. It only means that you are screwed if you get it. How is it not checking? It checks the contents of the file (archive) DMG and checks the code of the files to make sure you don't have the malicious code and then compares to their library and pops a warning that you are infected. That's called a check to me.

I'd like more explanation on differences between anti-virus and anti-malware. I'm pretty sure it's the same thing only malware is a broader term.

Malware, short for malicious software, is software designed to infiltrate a computer without the owner's informed consent. The expression is a general term used by computer professionals to mean a variety of forms of hostile, intrusive, or annoying software or program code.[1] The term "computer virus" is sometimes used as a catch-all phrase to include all types of malware, including true viruses.
It only checks for 2 files. I could write an Apple Script to do the same exact thing, did I just make an Anti-Virus? By your definition, yes.

Well what would you put in that script? and how would you identify that the code inside the DMG is indeed a virus. The fact that you have to write a code to check every file and then compare it to your active list of viruses that are already found is an anti-virus IMO. I don't know what else to call it. The fact that it's very basic doesn't change the fact that it will check every file inside and out to locate the malicious code.

Well what would you put in that script? and how would you identify that the code inside the DMG is indeed a virus. The fact that you have to write a code to check every file and then compare it to your active list of viruses that are already found is an anti-virus IMO. I don't know what else to call it. The fact that it's very basic doesn't change the fact that it will check every file inside and out to locate the malicious code.

Ok. By your definition its an anti-virus. I completely disagree.

Hardly ironic. They're keeping true to their word by preventing any possible malware from reaching your computer in the first place. It's essentially a re-worded confirmation box for when you run a new program, but made more focused on preventing malware to stop people mindlessly clicking 'run' when the box pops up.

Umm, isn't that what Kapersky/McAfee/Symantec/Microsoft do already? They're keeping true to their by preventing any possible malware from reaching your computer, but people will still click that "Open" button anyway, so it's really just the same. It offers the same amount of protection, by relying on common sense.

Anyway, the blacklisting is a good idea to a degree, but only if it's kept up-to-date.

so your comparing UAC that in Vista poped up everytime you run a program ( still pops up in 7 for me when i want to play a game ), or want to change a setting, to OSX that only pops up when something tried to access something that is locked ( user set ), or modify a system setting, and IN THIS CASE, flag's a virus/trojan

good comparison, their so alike

It is irony that Apple used to have one of the ads spreading lies about Vista's UAC. Now they are following the same boat, so pathetic.
It is irony that Apple used to have one of the ads spreading lies about Vista's UAC. Now they are following the same boat, so pathetic.

This has absolutely nothing to do with UAC. You apparently don't know what irony is either. You sound like a very misinformed person.

Checking DMGs for a couple of trojans that were going around in pirated software is hardly any kind of antivirus software. We'll probably never hear about it again.

This has absolutely nothing to do with UAC. You apparently don't know what irony is either. You sound like a very misinformed person.

Checking DMGs for a couple of trojans that were going around in pirated software is hardly any kind of antivirus software. We'll probably never hear about it again.

And that is different from checking for a few thousand trojans, how?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft kills AI-powered history search feature in Edge by Usama Jawad In June 2025, Microsoft began rolling out AI-powered history search functionality with Edge 138. The idea was simple: allow customers to use natural language phrases and synonyms to find their desired history items rather than matching keywords exactly. Although the company had already rolled out this capability in a phased manner, it has now decided to cancel it. In an update on its Microsoft 365 Roadmap, Microsoft has announced that it has decided not to move forward with AI-powered history search. The company has not detailed the exact reasoning behind this move, but it has apologized to customers for the inconvenience. The move is rather interesting as it seemingly could have improved user productivity. Edge users wouldn't have to worry about typos or exact keywords, and just focus on what they were trying to locate in their browser history. Microsoft had also assured users that an on-device AI model would be leveraged for this functionality, and no data would be sent to the cloud. IT admins also had the ability to control its availability through the EdgeHistoryAISearchEnabled policy. When the feature began rolling out last year, many of our readers called it creepy, noting that they couldn't trust Microsoft to keep their data on their device. Others also questioned its usefulness, saying that it's simply a way for Microsoft to insert more AI bloat into its products. Although the Redmond tech giant had stated that it will be more mindful about surfacing Copilot features in Windows 11 apps, we later discussed how this is mostly a rebranding exercise rather than an actual axing of AI functionalities. Indeed, a Microsoft executive later emphasized how they want to reshape Windows for the agentic AI era. That said, it does seem like at least AI-powered Edge history search isn't a part of that vision.
    • For you to jump on and defend your sweetheart? I agree, it didn't.
    • Not likely, of course, that we will see routine citizenship checks as they only involve compliance with existing federal voting laws already on the books for decades. This seems a non-issue entirely. Only fools would have the government rush headlong into an AI program few can understand or predict, or even debug...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Kolakid60 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      424
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!