[Rumour] Snow Leopard Has Hidden Antivirus Talents


Recommended Posts

Well that just makes it a bad anti-virus not a non-anti virus. The fact that it checks against the library of viruses to make sure you didn't catch is the definition of anti-virus program. That's how Windows anti-virus programs work too. They check your files and archives to make sure you don't have a known virus but also include a smarter heuristic methods that help prevent from those viruses that are unknown. Of course, if you are infected on OSX I'm not sure what you are to do. Reinstall the OS?

If it doesn't check for or remove viruses you cannot call this an Anti-Virus. It is at most an Anti-Malware. Which is a seperate type of application.

If it doesn't check for or remove viruses you cannot call this an Anti-Virus. It is at most an Anti-Malware. Which is a seperate type of application.

Removal doesn't necessarily need to be included to be called an anti-virus. It only means that you are screwed if you get it. How is it not checking? It checks the contents of the file (archive) DMG and checks the code of the files to make sure you don't have the malicious code and then compares to their library and pops a warning that you are infected. That's called a check to me.

I'd like more explanation on differences between anti-virus and anti-malware. I'm pretty sure it's the same thing only malware is a broader term.

Malware, short for malicious software, is software designed to infiltrate a computer without the owner's informed consent. The expression is a general term used by computer professionals to mean a variety of forms of hostile, intrusive, or annoying software or program code.[1] The term "computer virus" is sometimes used as a catch-all phrase to include all types of malware, including true viruses.
It only checks for 2 files. I could write an Apple Script to do the same exact thing, did I just make an Anti-Virus? By your definition, yes.

Well what would you put in that script? and how would you identify that the code inside the DMG is indeed a virus. The fact that you have to write a code to check every file and then compare it to your active list of viruses that are already found is an anti-virus IMO. I don't know what else to call it. The fact that it's very basic doesn't change the fact that it will check every file inside and out to locate the malicious code.

Well what would you put in that script? and how would you identify that the code inside the DMG is indeed a virus. The fact that you have to write a code to check every file and then compare it to your active list of viruses that are already found is an anti-virus IMO. I don't know what else to call it. The fact that it's very basic doesn't change the fact that it will check every file inside and out to locate the malicious code.

Ok. By your definition its an anti-virus. I completely disagree.

Hardly ironic. They're keeping true to their word by preventing any possible malware from reaching your computer in the first place. It's essentially a re-worded confirmation box for when you run a new program, but made more focused on preventing malware to stop people mindlessly clicking 'run' when the box pops up.

Umm, isn't that what Kapersky/McAfee/Symantec/Microsoft do already? They're keeping true to their by preventing any possible malware from reaching your computer, but people will still click that "Open" button anyway, so it's really just the same. It offers the same amount of protection, by relying on common sense.

Anyway, the blacklisting is a good idea to a degree, but only if it's kept up-to-date.

so your comparing UAC that in Vista poped up everytime you run a program ( still pops up in 7 for me when i want to play a game ), or want to change a setting, to OSX that only pops up when something tried to access something that is locked ( user set ), or modify a system setting, and IN THIS CASE, flag's a virus/trojan

good comparison, their so alike

It is irony that Apple used to have one of the ads spreading lies about Vista's UAC. Now they are following the same boat, so pathetic.
It is irony that Apple used to have one of the ads spreading lies about Vista's UAC. Now they are following the same boat, so pathetic.

This has absolutely nothing to do with UAC. You apparently don't know what irony is either. You sound like a very misinformed person.

Checking DMGs for a couple of trojans that were going around in pirated software is hardly any kind of antivirus software. We'll probably never hear about it again.

This has absolutely nothing to do with UAC. You apparently don't know what irony is either. You sound like a very misinformed person.

Checking DMGs for a couple of trojans that were going around in pirated software is hardly any kind of antivirus software. We'll probably never hear about it again.

And that is different from checking for a few thousand trojans, how?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
    • Bluestacks has been emulating Android on Windows for fifteen years. It's janky and riddled with ads though, so WSA looked like it was going to be a huge improvement over the emulator experience. Too bad Microsoft dropped the ball on that.
    • Classic. China would be nothing without Western, Japanese, and South Korean technology.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!