what's keeping you from getting a MAC?


Recommended Posts

2 things.. cost it cost too much to get a decent system... even though there is the mac mini.... i want a tad more but not quite an imac

2: a mid desktop model.. more than a mini... possibly the size of a shuttle or a microatx case. with a 799 price tag?

3: ive tried it out.... and really i dont wanna spend a grand for all i do is internet and play gta multiplayer san andreas............

3:$$$$$$$$$$$$

4$$$$$$$$$$$

5%%%%%%%

^ Using AMD/ATI would probably lower the price at least.

No, it really really wouldn't. In fact, Apple would probably charge MORE, to cover the "R&D costs" of making sure OSX runs on AMD processors properly... They know the fanboys will swallow any BS they shovel out.

I have an apple but recently my kid put a small disc in the superdrive and it got stuck. This voided my warranty so it'd cost me $800 to get a new drive & have it installed. This would stop me ever buying another mac

For me, it's simply the price. It's nothing short of extortion. I've used Macs several times in the local store we've got (not an Apple Store unfortunately, but it is an Apple Authorised Reseller, and it follows the Apple theme pretty well). I've been using Windows since the 95 days, but it didn't take me long to get adjusted to Mac OS. There's a couple button combinations I couldn't work out (does anyone know how to replicate Windows' Alt + F4 command in Mac? :p ), but besides that, it was pretty enjoyable.

Another thing I don't like is the Mighty Mouse, but if I do ever switch, I've got a Logitech MX Revolution, so no problems there! :p

The last thing I don't like is the sort-of lack of support for games, but I know it's on the increase nowadays, and if I do want to play any of my Steam games or something that isn't supported on Mac, I can simply install Windows 7 along with Snow Leopard! :p

games, price, lower performance per dollar (imacs vs desktops) and lack of customisability. i love the macbooks but the regular imacs don't cut it. They don't have the option to upgrade the graphics card, sound card, put in 2,3,4 hard drives, 2 optical drives and so on. even though you could argue that the mac pro is customisable, you'd lay out a fortune for it and get nothing much for what you pay.

For me, it's simply the price. It's nothing short of extortion. I've used Macs several times in the local store we've got (not an Apple Store unfortunately, but it is an Apple Authorised Reseller, and it follows the Apple theme pretty well). I've been using Windows since the 95 days, but it didn't take me long to get adjusted to Mac OS. There's a couple button combinations I couldn't work out (does anyone know how to replicate Windows' Alt + F4 command in Mac? :p ), but besides that, it was pretty enjoyable.

Another thing I don't like is the Mighty Mouse, but if I do ever switch, I've got a Logitech MX Revolution, so no problems there! :p

The last thing I don't like is the sort-of lack of support for games, but I know it's on the increase nowadays, and if I do want to play any of my Steam games or something that isn't supported on Mac, I can simply install Windows 7 along with Snow Leopard! :p

The Mac equivalent to Alt+F4 is Cmd+Q.

$$$$$$$$$$$

+1

And can't stand the business model. Like Apple is tending to go with their own standards (like mini-display). Overpriced hardware (the monitor prices are just insane) but I must admit that OSX is a great OS. They really should release it for PCs.

Edited by buzz99

LOL this thread is funny, Windows users justifying why they use Windows rather than Mac OS X.

1. hardware is not the issue ROFL.... You don't say hey that Ferrari has a 4lt engine and so does a ford xr6 so I'm not buying the ferrari based on it having pretty much the same specs.

2. You pay for what you get.

3. Yes it doesn't play games (that's all it doesn't do)

4. It does everything a Windows machine does without the virus' and spyware.

I'll keep laughing at this thread its a good one! :)

price, user interface, price, lack of software, price, reliability, price, design flaws in the hardware, price, apple's contempt for their customers, price... the list could go on

I owned and used a Mac for several years. I no longer do because:

1. I don't personally care for OS X.

2. I had constant problems with my iMac overheating and discs getting stuck in the slot loading drive.

3. I don't like the look of them since they brought out their new metal (aluminium?) machines.

Hardware wise I don't think they're any better than any other brand and not worth the extra cost. And OS wise I think Windows 7 (or even Windows Vista) is way nicer to work with.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!