Recommended Posts

32bit support won't be removed for a long long time, like a decade or more.

I think we will start to see Microsoft depreciate the 32-bit version of windows, starting with windows 8.

By this I mean that there probably will be a 32-bit version but they will only ship the 64-bit version, and considering the uptake of the 64-bit version of Windows 7 I think that's a fair bet.

I also think that windows 9 won't have a 32-bit version available, and that windows 10 will see the removal of WoW64 and any related 32-bit code.

I think we will start to see Microsoft depreciate the 32-bit version of windows, starting with windows 8.

By this I mean that there probably will be a 32-bit version but they will only ship the 64-bit version, and considering the uptake of the 64-bit version of Windows 7 I think that's a fair bet.

I also think that windows 9 won't have a 32-bit version available and that windows 10 will see the removal of WoW64.

guesstimating win10 it would be around 2019/20

why bother remove wow64? with increasing size of hdd ,they could instead make it optional subsystem that you can remove from control panel if you don't went it

guesstimating win10 it would be around 2019/20

why bother remove wow64? with increasing size of hdd ,they could instead make it optional subsystem that you can remove from control panel if you don't went it

But by then who is going to be using 32-bit programs anyway?

the whole UI needs to be redone on top of a better file system.

What file system would you like to see?

Don't say WinFS because that was just a relational database on top of NTFS.

On that subject there is nothing wrong with it.

But by then who is going to be using 32-bit programs anyway?

I have a customer who still uses a 16bit accounting package that runs in DOS. They have no intention of changing it as it does exactly what they need. Who know's but they still might be using it in 2020 :)

But by then who is going to be using 32-bit programs anyway?

i mean what harm would it be if they just make it removable component instead of tear it off altogether?

remember this?

post-254628-1259803042.png

i renamber it was project it after ten year we would have as big storage drive as 12TB !! or something of that sort

I have a customer who still uses a 16bit accounting package that runs in DOS. They have no intention of changing it as it does exactly what they need. Who know's but they still might be using it in 2020 :)

16bit won't run in 64bit windows,so that is irrelevant anyway

i mean what harm would it be if they just make it removable component instead of tear it off altogether?

remember this?

post-254628-1259803042.png

i renamber it was project it after ten year we would have as big storage drive as 12TB !! or something of that sort

Yes I do know the Turn Windows Features On or Off Dialog, however, AMD is working on 128-bit processors (Microsoft's 128-bit indiscretion) and Windows 8 and/or 9 is supposed to support that architecture. So, by windows 10 we won't need a 32-bit compatibility layer anyway, so why include one.

Edited by neo158
Yes I do know the Turn Windows Features On or Off Dialog, however, AMD is working on 128-bit processors (Microsoft's 128-bit indiscretion) and Windows 8 and/or 9 is supposed to support that architecture. So, by windows 10 we won't need a 32-bit compatibility layer anyway, so why include one.

We could be running on 256bit processors, that won't change the fact that we have 20 years of 32bit programs.

And on 128Bit CPU's, we'd have a "Windows64 on Windows128" layer just to run 64Bit apps.

Yes I do know the Turn Windows Features On or Off Dialog, however, AMD is working on 128-bit processors (Microsoft's 128-bit indiscretion) and Windows 8 and/or 9 is supposed to support that architecture

Windows 8 is scheduled for release in three years and will support an architecture that doesn't exist yet? Get real.

Really? Windows 8 MAY be based on Windows 7 and its refactored core (MinWin=refactoring work being done)? Are you saying there's a chance they could base it on Windows 3.11 instead?

How should they start building Windows 8?

Should they build off of previous OS releases and their code, or should they start from ABSOLUTE scratch and build everything from the registery to the calculator from nothing?

I can see benifiets on both sides, where you can cut time and resoucres starting on top of other OS's, or start fresh and build the bare nessities. I can only imagine they have improved their code writing and how they organize stuff.

Starting from scratch is pretty much impossible if you want to release it in less than 5 years.

I haven't laughed this much in a long time.

Windows 8 is scheduled for release in three years and will support an architecture that doesn't exist yet? Get real.

Thats just it, it's a prediction, just like all the other posts on here.

Fact is, we just don't know anything about Windows 8, apart from the release date being three years away!!!!!!

Actually 128-bit processors could be here as soon as 2011, especially if AMD's Bulldozer and Intel's Haswell Architecture turns out to be 128-bit.

I think they should work on refining the NTFS for SSD's, or just make another file system with the same idea as NTFS but obviously designed just for SSD's.

MS already made changes in Win7 to support SSDs better. Windows 7 makes use of the TRIM command on supported SSDs. This optimises when erase cycles are performed, thereby reducing the need to erase blocks before each write and increasing write performance. However, as of November 2009, hardware support for this command is limited with many drives requiring new firmware or not supporting TRIM at all.

If anything, SSD's have to better support the changes MS made to the file system first.

Thats just it, it's a prediction, just like all the other posts on here.

Fact is, we just don't know anything about Windows 8, apart from the release date being three years away!!!!!!

Actually 128-bit processors could be here as soon as 2011, especially if AMD's Bulldozer and Intel's Haswell Architecture turns out to be 128-bit.

They won't be though, there's no reason to jump to an 128bit address space when current hardware doesn't even use the full 64bit address space (most CPU's only use 46bits or something)

There's no reason to go to 128bits for a very long time.

They won't be though, there's no reason to jump to an 128bit address space when current hardware doesn't even use the full 64bit address space (most CPU's only use 46bits or something)

There's no reason to go to 128bits for a very long time.

Microsoft haven't stated anything about Windows 8 apart from a launch window of 2012, so you can't say that they won't support 128-bit, honestly, no one knows for sure what windows 8 will support.

Microsoft haven't stated anything about Windows 8 apart from a launch window of 2012, so you can't say that they won't support 128-bit, honestly, no one knows for sure what windows 8 will support.
128-bit processors could become prevalent when 16 exbibytes of addressable memory is no longer enough (128-bit processors would allow memory addressing for 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 bytes (~340.3 undecillion bytes or 281,474,976,710,656 yobibytes ). However, physical limits make such large amounts of memory currently impossible, given that amount greatly exceeds the total data stored on Earth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/128-bit

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!