Recommended Posts

32bit support won't be removed for a long long time, like a decade or more.

I think we will start to see Microsoft depreciate the 32-bit version of windows, starting with windows 8.

By this I mean that there probably will be a 32-bit version but they will only ship the 64-bit version, and considering the uptake of the 64-bit version of Windows 7 I think that's a fair bet.

I also think that windows 9 won't have a 32-bit version available, and that windows 10 will see the removal of WoW64 and any related 32-bit code.

I think we will start to see Microsoft depreciate the 32-bit version of windows, starting with windows 8.

By this I mean that there probably will be a 32-bit version but they will only ship the 64-bit version, and considering the uptake of the 64-bit version of Windows 7 I think that's a fair bet.

I also think that windows 9 won't have a 32-bit version available and that windows 10 will see the removal of WoW64.

guesstimating win10 it would be around 2019/20

why bother remove wow64? with increasing size of hdd ,they could instead make it optional subsystem that you can remove from control panel if you don't went it

guesstimating win10 it would be around 2019/20

why bother remove wow64? with increasing size of hdd ,they could instead make it optional subsystem that you can remove from control panel if you don't went it

But by then who is going to be using 32-bit programs anyway?

the whole UI needs to be redone on top of a better file system.

What file system would you like to see?

Don't say WinFS because that was just a relational database on top of NTFS.

On that subject there is nothing wrong with it.

But by then who is going to be using 32-bit programs anyway?

I have a customer who still uses a 16bit accounting package that runs in DOS. They have no intention of changing it as it does exactly what they need. Who know's but they still might be using it in 2020 :)

But by then who is going to be using 32-bit programs anyway?

i mean what harm would it be if they just make it removable component instead of tear it off altogether?

remember this?

post-254628-1259803042.png

i renamber it was project it after ten year we would have as big storage drive as 12TB !! or something of that sort

I have a customer who still uses a 16bit accounting package that runs in DOS. They have no intention of changing it as it does exactly what they need. Who know's but they still might be using it in 2020 :)

16bit won't run in 64bit windows,so that is irrelevant anyway

i mean what harm would it be if they just make it removable component instead of tear it off altogether?

remember this?

post-254628-1259803042.png

i renamber it was project it after ten year we would have as big storage drive as 12TB !! or something of that sort

Yes I do know the Turn Windows Features On or Off Dialog, however, AMD is working on 128-bit processors (Microsoft's 128-bit indiscretion) and Windows 8 and/or 9 is supposed to support that architecture. So, by windows 10 we won't need a 32-bit compatibility layer anyway, so why include one.

Edited by neo158
Yes I do know the Turn Windows Features On or Off Dialog, however, AMD is working on 128-bit processors (Microsoft's 128-bit indiscretion) and Windows 8 and/or 9 is supposed to support that architecture. So, by windows 10 we won't need a 32-bit compatibility layer anyway, so why include one.

We could be running on 256bit processors, that won't change the fact that we have 20 years of 32bit programs.

And on 128Bit CPU's, we'd have a "Windows64 on Windows128" layer just to run 64Bit apps.

Yes I do know the Turn Windows Features On or Off Dialog, however, AMD is working on 128-bit processors (Microsoft's 128-bit indiscretion) and Windows 8 and/or 9 is supposed to support that architecture

Windows 8 is scheduled for release in three years and will support an architecture that doesn't exist yet? Get real.

Really? Windows 8 MAY be based on Windows 7 and its refactored core (MinWin=refactoring work being done)? Are you saying there's a chance they could base it on Windows 3.11 instead?

How should they start building Windows 8?

Should they build off of previous OS releases and their code, or should they start from ABSOLUTE scratch and build everything from the registery to the calculator from nothing?

I can see benifiets on both sides, where you can cut time and resoucres starting on top of other OS's, or start fresh and build the bare nessities. I can only imagine they have improved their code writing and how they organize stuff.

Starting from scratch is pretty much impossible if you want to release it in less than 5 years.

I haven't laughed this much in a long time.

Windows 8 is scheduled for release in three years and will support an architecture that doesn't exist yet? Get real.

Thats just it, it's a prediction, just like all the other posts on here.

Fact is, we just don't know anything about Windows 8, apart from the release date being three years away!!!!!!

Actually 128-bit processors could be here as soon as 2011, especially if AMD's Bulldozer and Intel's Haswell Architecture turns out to be 128-bit.

I think they should work on refining the NTFS for SSD's, or just make another file system with the same idea as NTFS but obviously designed just for SSD's.

MS already made changes in Win7 to support SSDs better. Windows 7 makes use of the TRIM command on supported SSDs. This optimises when erase cycles are performed, thereby reducing the need to erase blocks before each write and increasing write performance. However, as of November 2009, hardware support for this command is limited with many drives requiring new firmware or not supporting TRIM at all.

If anything, SSD's have to better support the changes MS made to the file system first.

Thats just it, it's a prediction, just like all the other posts on here.

Fact is, we just don't know anything about Windows 8, apart from the release date being three years away!!!!!!

Actually 128-bit processors could be here as soon as 2011, especially if AMD's Bulldozer and Intel's Haswell Architecture turns out to be 128-bit.

They won't be though, there's no reason to jump to an 128bit address space when current hardware doesn't even use the full 64bit address space (most CPU's only use 46bits or something)

There's no reason to go to 128bits for a very long time.

They won't be though, there's no reason to jump to an 128bit address space when current hardware doesn't even use the full 64bit address space (most CPU's only use 46bits or something)

There's no reason to go to 128bits for a very long time.

Microsoft haven't stated anything about Windows 8 apart from a launch window of 2012, so you can't say that they won't support 128-bit, honestly, no one knows for sure what windows 8 will support.

Microsoft haven't stated anything about Windows 8 apart from a launch window of 2012, so you can't say that they won't support 128-bit, honestly, no one knows for sure what windows 8 will support.
128-bit processors could become prevalent when 16 exbibytes of addressable memory is no longer enough (128-bit processors would allow memory addressing for 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 bytes (~340.3 undecillion bytes or 281,474,976,710,656 yobibytes ). However, physical limits make such large amounts of memory currently impossible, given that amount greatly exceeds the total data stored on Earth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/128-bit

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      574
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!