Recommended Posts

Imagine if microsoft do release windows 8 in 128 bit platform like this article says..

They don't mean 128bit in the sense of our current 32bit and 64bit processors, they're talking about what types of data the processors can operate on.

We won't be using proper 128bit processors for a long, long time.

They don't mean 128bit in the sense of our current 32bit and 64bit processors, they're talking about what types of data the processors can operate on.

We won't be using proper 128bit processors for a long, long time.

Only 10% of the pc users are in 64bit, it will take years before anyone use 64bit as mainstream. So 128bit is not even in the industry mind yet.

Only 10% of the pc users are in 64bit, it will take years before anyone use 64bit as mainstream. So 128bit is not even in the industry mind yet.

Your statement doesn't hold water for the future, about about half (that's 46%) of all Windows 7 users have the 64bit version installed.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-20010092-75.html

I wonder how many lines of code from NT 3.5 are still in Windows 7.

Your statement doesn't hold water for the future, about about half (that's 46%) of all Windows 7 users have the 64bit version installed.

http://news.cnet.com...0010092-75.html

And Windows 7 is only about 15% of the market. so thats under 7% of PC's are using 64-bit Windows.

Heh, so Microsoft are going to go back to their two year release cycle and still rebuild the OS from scratch? That was a joke, right? :| Why would anyone even want them to?

As for that 128-bit thing:

?Robert Morgan is working to get IA-128 working backwards with full binary compatibility on the existing IA-64 instructions in the hardware simulation to work for Windows 8 and definitely Windows 9.?

a rewrite will NEVER EVER HAPPEN. EVER.

on the other hand with hardware virtualization i think that microsoft WILL drop obsolete apis an programs, etc from one release to the next. They have been maintaining excellent backwards compatibility at the expense of outdated bloat that's just holding the system back. i hope they get rid of the registry.

How should they start building Windows 8?

Should they build off of previous OS releases and their code, or should they start from ABSOLUTE scratch and build everything from the registery to the calculator from nothing?

I can see benifiets on both sides, where you can cut time and resoucres starting on top of other OS's, or start fresh and build the bare nessities. I can only imagine they have improved their code writing and how they organize stuff.

I wouldn't expect a rewrite of the entire OS... It just doesn't make any sense. They can rewrite or improve certain parts of the OS, but what's the sense in doing all of this from scratch? The OS already includes a very large feature set. Why start over and try to redo work that has already been done...?

a rewrite will NEVER EVER HAPPEN. EVER.

on the other hand with hardware virtualization i think that microsoft WILL drop obsolete apis an programs, etc from one release to the next. They have been maintaining excellent backwards compatibility at the expense of outdated bloat that's just holding the system back. i hope they get rid of the registry.

I see this a lot, but what would you have them replace the registry with? For what benefits? I just do not see the point...

Your statement doesn't hold water for the future, about about half (that's 46%) of all Windows 7 users have the 64bit version installed.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-20010092-75.html

May be true, but a lot don't want to move to x64 mainly because the lack of software. The majority of software is not in x64. Flash is still not x64 on windows, no stable x64 browsers, office just released in x64. No major software in x64. And some apps don't even function right.

So it would be a big step up.

As for that 128-bit thing:

?Robert Morgan is working to get IA-128 working backwards with full binary compatibility on the existing IA-64 instructions in the hardware simulation to work for Windows 8 and definitely Windows 9.?

8? 9? Windows 7 doesn't support IA-64, and 2008 R2 is the last server edition that supports it (it's been officially discontinued.)

on the other hand with hardware virtualization i think that microsoft WILL drop obsolete apis an programs, etc from one release to the next. They have been maintaining excellent backwards compatibility at the expense of outdated bloat that's just holding the system back.

Windows doesn't really have one set of APIs that are "old" and one that is "new." You can't really remove anything without also breaking brand new made-for-Windows 7 software.

I wouldn't expect a rewrite of the entire OS... It just doesn't make any sense. They can rewrite or improve certain parts of the OS, but what's the sense in doing all of this from scratch? The OS already includes a very large feature set. Why start over and try to redo work that has already been done...?

I see this a lot, but what would you have them replace the registry with? For what benefits? I just do not see the point...

text files. binary files. back in the windows 98 days the registry made sense. today it's a hive of incomprehensable data that is unusuable and it's cluttering gets so bad that it actually affects system performace and microsoft hasn't even included a utlitity to clean it up.

And Windows 7 is only about 15% of the market. so thats under 7% of PC's are using 64-bit Windows.

I hope you know there people that use Vista (11%) and XP (around 2 %) use 64bit. Not to mention Macs and Linux.

More than 7%. MY point was the trend.

text files. binary files. back in the windows 98 days the registry made sense. today it's a hive of incomprehensable data that is unusuable

You're also confusing separate issues here. The registry itself is simply a database, it cares nothing about what is stored in it. Your "incomprehensible data" complaint is thus with the data Windows stores in the registry database (which is not intended to be human readable, and makes heavy use of things like GUIDs), not the database itself. If we were to replace the registry with some other storage, the data stored would not change. It would be the exact same, just spreade over thousands and thousands of files (remember, Windows has access control requirements down to the key level.) The text files could not be accessible to the user or hand-editable either, because then something could lock the file and bring down the whole OS. This was a problem with Windows 3.11 and older which used this system. So, actual access to the text files would have to be abstracted away through APIs, and then what have you accomplished?

Really, what you are asking for is a major architectural redesign of Windows, and not just getting rid of the registry database. Now if Windows had been designed today, it would have been designed a little different, but it would likely still store its configuration data in a database.

cluttering gets so bad that it actually affects system performace and microsoft hasn't even included a utlitity to clean it up.

Evidence? I am requesting it, because to me the registry seems like a fairly high perfomance database that plain text files can't match. The only thing that can affect performance is invalid values in keys the system depends on, and I don't see how that would be any less of a problem if the invalid values were stored in some other format.

Windows 8 needs to be 64bit only, cmon MS it is the right time to make a 64bit only os, get with the times.

I don't think they will.By the time 8 is released I think most if not all hardware will be x64 only.The only reason I see them not doing 8 in x64 only versions is because of older systems.Older systems holds back Windows because they have to commendate older systems which sucks.

As for that 128-bit thing:

?Robert Morgan is working to get IA-128 working backwards with full binary compatibility on the existing IA-64 instructions in the hardware simulation to work for Windows 8 and definitely Windows 9.?

For the time being, Windows 7 is still anchored in the past, and just as Windows Vista, features its editions both in 32-bit (x86) and 64-bit (x64). If Microsoft continues to deliver Windows operating systems at the pace of one each three years, users can expect Windows 8 in 2011 or 2012. And while the Redmond company is bound to cut 32-bit support in the future for the Windows client, just as it did server-side with Windows Server 2008 R2, it has yet to be confirmed officially that Windows 8 or Windows 9 will play nice with 128-bit processors (CPUs).

Only time will tell when are we gonna usw 128 bit cpu's...

Windows doesn't really have one set of APIs that are "old" and one that is "new." You can't really remove anything without also breaking brand new made-for-Windows 7 software.

Windows 7 still has a lot of obsolete APIs, but this is because they want to keep backward compatibility.

One of obsolete "features" is registry. Biggest downside is that it's loaded in memory and if you install lots of crap regularly, system will eventually slow down. It might not be that bad if Windows would actually follow what changes to the registry every program makes and on uninstall it would simply revert back and remove unnecessary stuff.

AFAIK there is still a lot of software that need administration privileges to run. Microsoft could simply say that they are obsolete and wouldn't allow installation of such programs. The same goes for programs that don't use appropriate folders for their data (e.g. user data goes into X:\{user}\AppData, executables and DLLs go into X:\Program Files, etc.)

For the time being, Windows 7 is still anchored in the past, and just as Windows Vista, features its editions both in 32-bit (x86) and 64-bit (x64). If Microsoft continues to deliver Windows operating systems at the pace of one each three years, users can expect Windows 8 in 2011 or 2012. And while the Redmond company is bound to cut 32-bit support in the future for the Windows client, just as it did server-side with Windows Server 2008 R2, it has yet to be confirmed officially that Windows 8 or Windows 9 will play nice with 128-bit processors (CPUs).

Only time will tell when are we gonna usw 128 bit cpu's...

No I don't think we'll see it out for a while yet.look at Windows ME and Windows 2000, they didn't last long because they were crap to most people then came XP that lasted what 6 years? Since Microsoft seem's to have Windows 7 decently built I don't see them rushing to get a replacement OS any time soon.

No I don't think we'll see it out for a while yet.look at Windows ME and Windows 2000, they didn't last long because they were crap to most people then came XP that lasted what 6 years? Since Microsoft seem's to have Windows 7 decently built I don't see them rushing to get a replacement OS any time soon.

But what about Microsoft's every two-three years. Windows 95 - 98 - 2000 - ME - XP (Might be the other way around) That's 5 OS's in 6 years. And currently it now has been 3 OS's in 10 years. So Windows 8 is due around 2011.

Windows 7 still has a lot of obsolete APIs, but this is because they want to keep backward compatibility.

Like? Name some.

One of obsolete "features" is registry. Biggest downside is that it's loaded in memory and if you install lots of crap regularly, system will eventually slow down.

Would you mind providing your benchmarking data that shows that 50 or a 100 or even a 1000 keys under HKCU\Software has a performance impact?

AFAIK there is still a lot of software that need administration privileges to run. Microsoft could simply say that they are obsolete and wouldn't allow installation of such programs. The same goes for programs that don't use appropriate folders for their data (e.g. user data goes into X:\{user}\AppData, executables and DLLs go into X:\Program Files, etc.)

I don't see how this accomplishes anything of value.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!