Turn 10 responds to Forza graphics backlash


Recommended Posts

Turn 10 responds to Forza graphics backlash

Tuesday 29-Sep-2009 11:30 AM In-game car models "could be better" admits dev

Since the playable demo for Forza Motorsport 3 went live last week, gamers have complained that the game's in-game visuals don't live up to screenshots previously released by developer Turn 10.

Complaints focus mainly on the car models, which appear to be of a noticeably lower detail than when in the game's photo mode. A Turn 10 rep explains: "One clarification about photomode and screenshots we've released so far. Aside from the added effects such as AA, DOF, and motion blur, all assets you see in photomode are the same," said Turn 10's Che Chou.

"Although I do stand corrected on one factor which is the player car. They do have higher detail in photomode while all other cars, the environments, etc. are exactly what you see in game," he went on to admit.

"Anyway, did not mean to mislead or 'play dumb' with earlier statements as I misunderstood how LODs were being used in the various modes," added Chou.

He went on to defend the overall look of the game against forum user complaints. "Games with bad graphics distract me from my experience. That said, when I play FM3, I do not think about how awful the graphics are or low in-game car models, etc. simply because the overall effect is that the game looks good. Can it look better? Yes, totally and I agree it is not perfect. But does it justify the vitriol of some of the threads I've scanned this morning? I'm not sure that it does."

What did you think of the demo?

CVG

were they aiming to run at 60fps? mmmm that was a bad thing that they apparently lied with the screenshots ....well kinda

May be that LOD is impossible in-game for this generation hardware?

It looks nice, and even though I haven't played it yet, I'm sure it's still going to be a great game. In the end a quality release is all I expect.

I wouldn't complain about this, because I'm the sort who wouldn't care about a slight difference in graphics, oh wait, it's people whining about graphics in games again? Things never change... :rolleyes:

EDIT: I can see why they're frustrated yes, but still I'm just happy with a game that's fun to play and looks reasonably good.

So this all started because in photomode, the players car graphics and overall look is upped a bit using more AA and so on compared to in-game? Is that right?

If so, I don't see why the moaning is taking place. The game can obviously do this because in playback/photomode/replay etc, it's free to put a little extra processing time on the models compared to the actual in-game race where loads of other things are being processed. It's a simple trade off that has to be made imo. That said the game could've looked better as they say, but it's at 2 DVDs already, they didn't want to make it 3 I'm sure.

I tried the demo. Didn't think it looked that bad at all. But, I dunno, it was kinda boring. I'm still getting it though.

Try activating the clutch and manual gears, if you havn't already, I found that made things a lot more fun.

It's not like this is the first or will be the last title to have models look better in replays. I thought it was a given that the shots shown earlier would generally have more processing applied to those in an actual race.

The environments look really nice, but eh cars are unimpressive. I actually think shift had better graphics, particularly the cockpit view.

GT5 is probably gonna own them both :p too bad I don't have a ps3, I used to love playing gt3 on my ps2.

I hate to say "I told you so", but it was obvious from the release of Forza 2 that the pics released all along were from photo mode, which does look slightly better, as I said in my post here :rolleyes:

aaaand ? of course they where form photomode, that was already a known, that's also why most of the screens had no driver. those that did however would most likely be from replay though.

oh well, I'll give you some praise.

Good boy! You noticed the obvious. :rolleyes:

In any case, you'd be hard pressed to call the Forza 3 graphics anything resembling bad. I rather they put the processing power towards the actual racing and simulation/physics rather than looks unlike other most other sim racers anyway. Even though I do like a good lookign car game, but if the sim part is mere arcade, then I'd rather play an actual arcade game like PGR.

Well Forza does look good, no it's not at GT5 standards, but you have to remember the cost of consoles in comparison to their PC counterparts. The console itself is normally less than a single graphics card that some people seem to be cmparing it to. People need realistic expectations of what the machine can achieve with what it has to work with. Agreed sometimes PR companies shoot themselves in the foot with bullshots but that's what they seem to do best.

So the photo mode makes the images look better, this was obvious. You'd have to quite an anal nerd to make a fuss. The game looks amazing.

The environments look really nice, but eh cars are unimpressive. I actually think shift had better graphics, particularly the cockpit view.

Unimpressive? Really?

I seriously think some people either have eye sight problems or issues with their TV.

so this kinds of splits forza3 , and other games that do this , into 2 different parts... the low quality graphics part where you focus on the gameplay, and the high quality replays where you show off your driving... after all they didnt put the high quality models there just so people skip the replays

So the photo mode makes the images look better, this was obvious. You'd have to quite an anal nerd to make a fuss. The game looks amazing.

Unimpressive? Really?

I seriously think some people either have eye sight problems or issues with their TV.

My TV is fine, but I had set my expectation set low after Forza2 and let's just say I wasn't disappointed. The game doesn't look as great when playing. I don't care much about replays and am more of a NFS/PGR person(I mean arcade). :/ The graphics are good but they should show actual game footage.

Edited by dhan

No photomode in the demo. The samething was true in Forza 2 as well, the game looked much better in photomode than in real time. To me the game is beautiful and way ahead of Froza 2, but when I am driving at 100 mph+ I am not paying attention to the door locks and lug nuts on the opponents cars or the bolts holding up the grand stands lol :D Still keeping my pre-order for the LE edition :)

I'm going to have to disagree with a few of you here.

There was a time when we would see screen shots and we all knew they were from FMV's and/or were not actual game play. Then there was a time that we would all be in shock when we found out screens were of actual game play, think Gears Of War, Assassins Creed, etc.

So now we've gone back to faking screen shots, I didn't get the memo on that one.

It's not faking anything. I like how some of you are trying to spin this like it is for some unknown reason (though maybe I can guess why).

All they do is add some AA and other effects, plus a little more detail in photomode which they can because the game itself isn't using the GPU/CPU like it is during a race. They made it very clear. Photomode is FROM THE GAME, not a doctored up photoshop image some of the designers did just for kicks and PR.

Fake, in this instance doesn't apply.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!