Turn 10 responds to Forza graphics backlash


Recommended Posts

This all effects gameplay how?

I know theres the mindset that graphics don't matter but lets be honest here, they do help create a sense of immersion in what is a title trying to simulate reality. If that's not relevant to the gameplay I don't know what is. Not saying graphics are the be-end-all but I don't subscribe to the notion that game mechanics is all that contributes to the gameplay while the visuals themselves are unimportant.

Anyhow, the game still looks good.

  • 2 weeks later...
Well Forza does look good, no it's not at GT5 standards, but you have to remember the cost of consoles in comparison to their PC counterparts. The console itself is normally less than a single graphics card that some people seem to be cmparing it to. People need realistic expectations of what the machine can achieve with what it has to work with. Agreed sometimes PR companies shoot themselves in the foot with bullshots but that's what they seem to do best.

No.

I would expect GT5 to look good if not better than Forza 3, why? Because they've delayed the game so many times it's getting pathetic, so I wouldn't expect anything less.

Personally, I don't understand people complaining about the graphics in FM3. 60FPS, detail galore, and smooth almost precise physics for everything from tyre traction and warping to weight and body roll. All this makes up for a completely immersive racing simulation.

I can't complain at all. Both the demo, and now the full release, have been completely entertaining and enjoyable to play.

If I could fault anything, it would be the music. Compared to FM2, it's pretty average.

Well Forza does look good, no it's not at GT5 standards,

How? GT5 for example also releases pre-rendered and photo-mode replay shots. The in-game cars have no AA and look slightly worse, just like Forza 3.

I think that Forza 3 looks at least on par with GT5. We are yet to see real in-game screenshots from GT5 but I think it won't look that much better than Forza 3 to be perfectly honest. I do think that GT5 will have better lighting but that's about it and is mostly due to creativity of the crew in charged and the fact they had quite a few years to make the game and will still release it like 6 or more months after Forza 3.

I just want to ask what this whole hubbub is all about..

Is the final game looking like the demo or worse? I mean it's common knowledge that replays and photo-modes will always look better than the actual gameplay because the replays and photos don't have real-time calculations and similar so devs can pump up the details.

FM3 demo looked stunning to me. Cars were fantastic and super detailed and handling and racing feel was terrific. The best driving game I've played so far in my life and I can't wait until I pick it up in the morning and play around with vinyl editor and customize my dream vehicles like I did in FM2.

i dont see what the big fuss is

just cover it up with enough glare, motion blur and camera shake and all will be fine! if it ends up looking like you are driving drunk or something, all the better cuz its just a game and its ok to do that

then during replay mode you could say that it was recorded with professional cameras and stuff, thats why the glare and blur is gone and everything is clearer...

it gives people reason to watch the replays since thats the only way you can appreciate all the stuff they put into the game world...

i dont see what the big fuss is

just cover it up with enough glare, motion blur and camera shake and all will be fine! if it ends up looking like you are driving drunk or something, all the better cuz its just a game and its ok to do that

No, that's shift :p

How? GT5 for example also releases pre-rendered and photo-mode replay shots. The in-game cars have no AA and look slightly worse, just like Forza 3.

I think that Forza 3 looks at least on par with GT5. We are yet to see real in-game screenshots from GT5 but I think it won't look that much better than Forza 3 to be perfectly honest. I do think that GT5 will have better lighting but that's about it and is mostly due to creativity of the crew in charged and the fact they had quite a few years to make the game and will still release it like 6 or more months after Forza 3.

I just want to ask what this whole hubbub is all about..

Is the final game looking like the demo or worse? I mean it's common knowledge that replays and photo-modes will always look better than the actual gameplay because the replays and photos don't have real-time calculations and similar so devs can pump up the details.

FM3 demo looked stunning to me. Cars were fantastic and super detailed and handling and racing feel was terrific. The best driving game I've played so far in my life and I can't wait until I pick it up in the morning and play around with vinyl editor and customize my dream vehicles like I did in FM2.

Uhh GT5 has 2xAA at 1080p, 4xAA at 720p. Forza 3 has 2xAA at 720p.

Also this topic was primarily created because all those photomode shots Turn10 released, they can't be created by you or me because photomode in Forza 3 is limited to 720p, and all the pictures are heavily compressed. Not to mention there's no cockpit mode available for photomode. Therefore people are angry at Turn10 claiming all the pre-release shots are from photomode while none of them can be recreated. Try creating something like this in photomode, you can't.

GT5 does 8 mega pixel photo mode.

you can recreate those shots, it's when you upload them to the servers they get compressed. the shots you make on the 360 can be just as good looking, turn10 just has a way of getting the pics uncompressed while we don't.

you can recreate those shots, it's when you upload them to the servers they get compressed. the shots you make on the 360 can be just as good looking, turn10 just has a way of getting the pics uncompressed while we don't.

Well if you notice the above shot is 1080p as well, Forza 3 screencaps output at 720p.

Still as I said Turn10 told people they could do the shots in photomode, if they're compressing them, that's still causing the complaints because the shots don't look like what Turn10 have been releasing.

You also have shots like this, which can't be done at all.

Are we really complaining about the photos it produces? If I were Turn 10 I would focus on the FPS issues on the last game. They can't market their game based on the photos it produces, but they can sure as hell make a big noise about the game being 60fps, as will anyone reviewing the game.

Well if you notice the above shot is 1080p as well, Forza 3 screencaps output at 720p.

Still as I said Turn10 told people they could do the shots in photomode, if they're compressing them, that's still causing the complaints because the shots don't look like what Turn10 have been releasing.

You also have shots like this, which can't be done at all.

Are you sure the shots stored on the 360 isn't 1080 ? because I'm not.

honestly though, if you bought forza to take virtual photos... you might consider buying a camera instead.

Are you sure the shots stored on the 360 isn't 1080 ? because I'm not.

honestly though, if you bought forza to take virtual photos... you might consider buying a camera instead.

Does it matter? It's not uploaded in 1080p is it?

As for your second comment, for a car enthusiast in a game where you also get access to livery/vinyls, it's of no surprise people aren't happy you can't output those lovely large detailed screenshots Turn10 have been.

Anyway you've got MS to thank, not so much Turn10, they won't let them output JPG/PNG to the 360 hard drive therefore Turn10 need to foot the bandwidth which results in heavily compressed images.

Are we really complaining about the photos it produces? If I were Turn 10 I would focus on the FPS issues on the last game. They can't market their game based on the photos it produces, but they can sure as hell make a big noise about the game being 60fps, as will anyone reviewing the game.

Any racing game looking to take itself seriously will run at 60FPS nowadays.

Motion Blur, AKA NFS Shift mode, is not a substitute for speed.

Well if you notice the above shot is 1080p as well, Forza 3 screencaps output at 720p.

Still as I said Turn10 told people they could do the shots in photomode, if they're compressing them, that's still causing the complaints because the shots don't look like what Turn10 have been releasing.

You also have shots like this, which can't be done at all.

It's exactly the same at what PD does with GT5 shots. It shows the detail of imagery. They are promo photos. Most of the GT5 are like this. Super polished, pre-rendered and in case of previews most likely cleaned up.

I just think there is absolutely no need for people to complain. The compression of photo mode was explained by Turn 10 and they said that compression will go away but they are trying to evaluate the amount of bandwidth people will utilize with photo mode and didn't want to overload the servers from the start. Once the number of users stabilizes and they will have a good idea how much bandwith and servers they need and they promised to drastically improve the quality. It's mostly a precaution right now.

And I'm yet to see GT5 running at 2x full 1080p. There is simply no way they can pull it off. If they do, hats off but I'm pretty sure their resolution will be closer to 720p. PS3 simply doesn't have enough juice to do 2x full 1080p AA, the GPU can't handle it. Uncharted 2 even though it looks fantastic couldn't and these guys are crazy involved with PS3's architecture.

It's exactly the same at what PD does with GT5 shots. It shows the detail of imagery. They are promo photos. Most of the GT5 are like this. Super polished, pre-rendered and in case of previews most likely cleaned up.

I just think there is absolutely no need for people to complain. The compression of photo mode was explained by Turn 10 and they said that compression will go away but they are trying to evaluate the amount of bandwidth people will utilize with photo mode and didn't want to overload the servers from the start. Once the number of users stabilizes and they will have a good idea how much bandwith and servers they need and they promised to drastically improve the quality. It's mostly a precaution right now.

And I'm yet to see GT5 running at 2x full 1080p. There is simply no way they can pull it off. If they do, hats off but I'm pretty sure their resolution will be closer to 720p. PS3 simply doesn't have enough juice to do 2x full 1080p AA, the GPU can't handle it. Uncharted 2 even though it looks fantastic couldn't and these guys are crazy involved with PS3's architecture.

Yeah but the difference is we as GT5 owners will be able to take the same shots PD take. What happens is the shots capture at 8 megapixels in GT5, then are resized for 1080p for marketing, therefore they are supersampled, but still in-game. You have the effects given to replay mode, which we are all familiar with, and supersampling.

GT5 8 megapixel image from photomode - PD will no doubt take these, then resize them to 1080p for marketing.

I think the Forza 3 fans raising the backlash were led to believe due to Che saying Turn10 use the in-game photomode for promo shots they'd be able to create the same results as Turn10 - It was only AFTER the game came out everyone found out the photomode shots were heavily compressed and nothing like what Turn10 were releasing (you can't do cockpit view at all, nothing to do with compression). The dury is out on how much they improve it, but I don't think it will be too much, as I said they're footing the bandwidth bill on this - MS really should just let them output to the hard drive.

GT5 will not be full 1080p 2xAA, it'll be similar to Prologue which is ????x1080 2xAA. 1080 horizontally, scaled somewhat vertically.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. What???
    • What part of "you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever" is not clear enough?
    • Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      165
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!