The whole intelligent life on other planets and communication with us.


Recommended Posts

Bill Bryson said it best:

"Of course, it is possible that alien beings travel billions of miles to amuse themselves by planting crop circles in Wiltshire of frighting the daylights out of some poor guy in a pickup truck on a lonely road in Arizona (they must have teenagers, after all), but it does seem unlikely.

Still, statistically the probability that there are other thinking beings out there is good. Nobody knows how many starts there are in the Milky Way- estimates range from 100 billion or some to perhaps 400 billion -and the Milky Way is just one of 140 billion or so other galaxies, many of them even larger than ours. In the 1960's, a professor at Cornell named Frank Drake, excited by such whopping numbers, worked out a famous equation designed to calculate the chances of advanced life in the cosmos based on a series of diminishing probabilities.

Under Drakes equation you divide the number of stars in a selected portion of the universe by the number of stars that are likely to have planetary systems; divide that by the number of planetary systems that could theoretically support life; divide that by the number on which life, having arisen, advances to a state of intelligence; and so on. At each such division, the number shrinks colossally- yet even with the most conservative inputs the number of advanced civilizations just in the Milky Way always works out to be somewhere in the millions.

What an interesting and exciting thought. We may be only one of millions of advanced civilizations. Unfortunately, space being spacious, the average distance between any two of these civilizations is reckoned to be at lease two hundred light-years, which is a great deal more than merely saying it makes it sound. It means for a start that even if these being know we are here and are somehow able to see us in their telescopes, they're watching light that left Earth two hundred years ago. So they're not seeing you and me. They're watching the French Revolution and Thomas Jefferson and people in silk stockings and powdered wigs- people who don't know what an atom is, or a gene, and who make their electricity by rubbing a rod of amber with a piece of fur and think that's quite a trick. Any message we receive from them is likely to begin "dear sire," and congratulate us on the handsomeness of our horses and our master of whale oil. Two hundred light-years is a distance so far beyond us as to be, well, just beyond us..."

Also, do you really think that Aliens will take the time to navigate through all of this, to come down and say "Hi!"?

Also, do you really think that Aliens will take the time to navigate through all of this, to come down and say "Hi!"?

The only sensible reason I can think of for extra-terrestrial intelligences to visit us is for some kind of zoological purpose. They'd have to be so far ahead of us to be able to make the trip, that we'd be little more then hairless apes in comparison.

If we'd truly be visited by someone, I'd imagine it would at least be by robots.

I don't really believe in FTL travel from what we know about it today.

Well, maybe some kind of hibernation and replacing bodily fluids or breeding some sort of long lasting organism if they've mastered genetic (or molecular, whatever, if they aren't using genes) engineering, but I think robots would be the by far easiest way of doing it. Heck, we can already build long lasting probes plus long lasting robots that "phone home" with today's technology. It's only a matter of government budgets.

If I was an "Alien" traveling the galaxy trough Hyperspace and came across the third quadrant in the Sirius sector and navigated to a system close to a binary star that had some interesting lifeforms on a planet which was covered by a noxious weed known as "humans", I would try to make contact with the intelligent lifeforms (aquatic) and give them advice about getting rid of the noxious weed :)

  • 2 weeks later...
If we'd truly be visited by someone, I'd imagine it would at least be by robots.

I don't really believe in FTL travel from what we know about it today.

Well, maybe some kind of hibernation and replacing bodily fluids or breeding some sort of long lasting organism if they've mastered genetic (or molecular, whatever, if they aren't using genes) engineering, but I think robots would be the by far easiest way of doing it. Heck, we can already build long lasting probes plus long lasting robots that "phone home" with today's technology. It's only a matter of government budgets.

exactly. as far as we know there isnt

remember 100 years ago it was *impossible to go to the moon* just because we dont know something. does not mean its not possible

I believe primitive or sophisticated life does exist somewhere, maybe everywhere in the Universe. But the distance's to travel are so great we aint ever going to know about it in the near future.

Isnt the Universe only so many billion years old? Only so much time for evolution to progress?

Dont get me started, I could go on all night.

:)

If I was an "Alien" traveling the galaxy trough Hyperspace and came across the third quadrant in the Sirius sector and navigated to a system close to a binary star that had some interesting lifeforms on a planet which was covered by a noxious weed known as "humans", I would try to make contact with the intelligent lifeforms (aquatic) and give them advice about getting rid of the noxious weed :)

"They" should give you advice on how to end your crack addiction. =)

If we're aware that it takes 200 years to see 200 light years away, I think it's very likely the other "intelligent" forms out there know the same thing. So IF we were to receive a response, it'd more likely to be "Here's how you can reply to us..." :p

  • 1 month later...

and their all saying to each other if those earthlings ever get out of their solar system we'll have no other choice but to annihilate them.... Unfortunately for us our code cracking skills are so crap we interpret what we hear as "hi we come in peace"

If we'd truly be visited by someone, I'd imagine it would at least be by robots.

I don't really believe in FTL travel from what we know about it today.

Well, maybe some kind of hibernation and replacing bodily fluids or breeding some sort of long lasting organism if they've mastered genetic (or molecular, whatever, if they aren't using genes) engineering, but I think robots would be the by far easiest way of doing it. Heck, we can already build long lasting probes plus long lasting robots that "phone home" with today's technology. It's only a matter of government budgets.

What about relativistic time dilation? If a form of propulsion were devloped wich could take us to 99% the speed of light (just don't crash into anything), a 200 lightyear distance may be seen as a 200 year mission (well, slightly more) from the perspective of Earth, but in the spaceship it would be a 28 year journey (according to this calculator: http://www.1728.com/reltivty.htm ).

So it is theoretically possible to visit life on other planets with a single generation of human beings. The problem would come in choosing a suitable planet... and what to do when you get there. Either way, using the figures mentioned. It'd be at least 400 years until the experiment would pay off and yield any payback for the people of earth.

(Minifig @ Sep 30 2009, 20:13)

Also, do you really think that Aliens will take the time to navigate through all of this, to come down and say "Hi!"?

Although I have seen the pictures of the planet comparisons and the Hubble sequences, it never fails to amaze me! We really are totally insignificant in the great scale of things!

Bill Bryson said it best:

Also, do you really think that Aliens will take the time to navigate through all of this, to come down and say "Hi!"?

I dont know exactly where you get they would have to go though half that.

those are based on size

  • 3 weeks later...
The only sensible reason I can think of for extra-terrestrial intelligences to visit us is for some kind of zoological purpose. They'd have to be so far ahead of us to be able to make the trip, that we'd be little more then hairless apes in comparison.

How many people on our planet have traveled the planet to not only study other creatures but just sit and watch? Answer: millions....No reason to think Aliens wouldnt be interested in doing the same to us. Maybe they are doing tv shows the same way we watch NeoGeo on ants or us.

who says they are really that far away anyway :shifty:

ding ding ding, "far away" is subjective. Far away for us now on Earth is not the same as it was just 100 yrs ago.

The weak anthropic principle: "...conditions that are observed in the universe must allow the observer to exist."

The way my professor explained this in laments terms for us at art school was that we exist on the planet earth because the conditions for us to exist are perfect to do so. The right amount of oxygen, gravity, etc. etc. etc.

So if you believe this, then it is not only possible, but also very plausible, that life exists somewhere else in the galaxy. The way he explained that is it might not be life as far as we know it, and said it could be life that we do not even recognize with the human eye.

So just something to think about. What we know as life forms are indeed not the only type of life forms that may exist... thus the term alien.

Maybe they are more intelligent beings, have their own set of measurements and understanding of how things work and are more flexible with it than what we have constructed through our observations. I think it's strange to have probabilities thrown with the vast unknown and our VERY limited knowledge of how the universe and even our own damn selves work, but I guess it makes people feel more comfortable.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread with your bias post.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
    • eSound Music 3.0.0 by Razvan Serea eSound Music is a free music streaming app that gives you access to over 150 million tracks from all genres. It allows you to search and listen to your favorite songs, create personalized playlists, and explore trending music. With an intuitive interface and smart search, discovering new artists and hits is fast and easy. You can even stream music in the background while using other apps. One of eSound’s standout features is its offline mode, letting you download and listen without internet access. eSound is widely compatible, working seamlessly across Windows, macOS, Linux, iPhone, iPad, Android, HarmonyOS, Amazon Fire devices, CarPlay, Android Auto, and more. eSound Music key features: Over 150 million tracks available Smart search for songs, artists, albums, and playlists Personalized song recommendations Continuous playback with auto-generated playlists Offline mode with song and playlist downloads Daily-updated trending charts and top songs Sleep timer to auto-stop playback High-quality audio support Customizable playlists and favorites Support for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto Works on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, HarmonyOS, Amazon Fire, and more Cross-device sync via account login Background playback while using other apps Download: eSound Music 64-bit | Portable | ~160.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Download: ARM64 | 116.0 MB Links: eSound Music Website | Screenshot | Web Player | Other OSes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!