The whole intelligent life on other planets and communication with us.


Recommended Posts

Bill Bryson said it best:

"Of course, it is possible that alien beings travel billions of miles to amuse themselves by planting crop circles in Wiltshire of frighting the daylights out of some poor guy in a pickup truck on a lonely road in Arizona (they must have teenagers, after all), but it does seem unlikely.

Still, statistically the probability that there are other thinking beings out there is good. Nobody knows how many starts there are in the Milky Way- estimates range from 100 billion or some to perhaps 400 billion -and the Milky Way is just one of 140 billion or so other galaxies, many of them even larger than ours. In the 1960's, a professor at Cornell named Frank Drake, excited by such whopping numbers, worked out a famous equation designed to calculate the chances of advanced life in the cosmos based on a series of diminishing probabilities.

Under Drakes equation you divide the number of stars in a selected portion of the universe by the number of stars that are likely to have planetary systems; divide that by the number of planetary systems that could theoretically support life; divide that by the number on which life, having arisen, advances to a state of intelligence; and so on. At each such division, the number shrinks colossally- yet even with the most conservative inputs the number of advanced civilizations just in the Milky Way always works out to be somewhere in the millions.

What an interesting and exciting thought. We may be only one of millions of advanced civilizations. Unfortunately, space being spacious, the average distance between any two of these civilizations is reckoned to be at lease two hundred light-years, which is a great deal more than merely saying it makes it sound. It means for a start that even if these being know we are here and are somehow able to see us in their telescopes, they're watching light that left Earth two hundred years ago. So they're not seeing you and me. They're watching the French Revolution and Thomas Jefferson and people in silk stockings and powdered wigs- people who don't know what an atom is, or a gene, and who make their electricity by rubbing a rod of amber with a piece of fur and think that's quite a trick. Any message we receive from them is likely to begin "dear sire," and congratulate us on the handsomeness of our horses and our master of whale oil. Two hundred light-years is a distance so far beyond us as to be, well, just beyond us..."

Also, do you really think that Aliens will take the time to navigate through all of this, to come down and say "Hi!"?

Also, do you really think that Aliens will take the time to navigate through all of this, to come down and say "Hi!"?

The only sensible reason I can think of for extra-terrestrial intelligences to visit us is for some kind of zoological purpose. They'd have to be so far ahead of us to be able to make the trip, that we'd be little more then hairless apes in comparison.

If we'd truly be visited by someone, I'd imagine it would at least be by robots.

I don't really believe in FTL travel from what we know about it today.

Well, maybe some kind of hibernation and replacing bodily fluids or breeding some sort of long lasting organism if they've mastered genetic (or molecular, whatever, if they aren't using genes) engineering, but I think robots would be the by far easiest way of doing it. Heck, we can already build long lasting probes plus long lasting robots that "phone home" with today's technology. It's only a matter of government budgets.

If I was an "Alien" traveling the galaxy trough Hyperspace and came across the third quadrant in the Sirius sector and navigated to a system close to a binary star that had some interesting lifeforms on a planet which was covered by a noxious weed known as "humans", I would try to make contact with the intelligent lifeforms (aquatic) and give them advice about getting rid of the noxious weed :)

  • 2 weeks later...
If we'd truly be visited by someone, I'd imagine it would at least be by robots.

I don't really believe in FTL travel from what we know about it today.

Well, maybe some kind of hibernation and replacing bodily fluids or breeding some sort of long lasting organism if they've mastered genetic (or molecular, whatever, if they aren't using genes) engineering, but I think robots would be the by far easiest way of doing it. Heck, we can already build long lasting probes plus long lasting robots that "phone home" with today's technology. It's only a matter of government budgets.

exactly. as far as we know there isnt

remember 100 years ago it was *impossible to go to the moon* just because we dont know something. does not mean its not possible

I believe primitive or sophisticated life does exist somewhere, maybe everywhere in the Universe. But the distance's to travel are so great we aint ever going to know about it in the near future.

Isnt the Universe only so many billion years old? Only so much time for evolution to progress?

Dont get me started, I could go on all night.

:)

If I was an "Alien" traveling the galaxy trough Hyperspace and came across the third quadrant in the Sirius sector and navigated to a system close to a binary star that had some interesting lifeforms on a planet which was covered by a noxious weed known as "humans", I would try to make contact with the intelligent lifeforms (aquatic) and give them advice about getting rid of the noxious weed :)

"They" should give you advice on how to end your crack addiction. =)

If we're aware that it takes 200 years to see 200 light years away, I think it's very likely the other "intelligent" forms out there know the same thing. So IF we were to receive a response, it'd more likely to be "Here's how you can reply to us..." :p

  • 1 month later...

and their all saying to each other if those earthlings ever get out of their solar system we'll have no other choice but to annihilate them.... Unfortunately for us our code cracking skills are so crap we interpret what we hear as "hi we come in peace"

If we'd truly be visited by someone, I'd imagine it would at least be by robots.

I don't really believe in FTL travel from what we know about it today.

Well, maybe some kind of hibernation and replacing bodily fluids or breeding some sort of long lasting organism if they've mastered genetic (or molecular, whatever, if they aren't using genes) engineering, but I think robots would be the by far easiest way of doing it. Heck, we can already build long lasting probes plus long lasting robots that "phone home" with today's technology. It's only a matter of government budgets.

What about relativistic time dilation? If a form of propulsion were devloped wich could take us to 99% the speed of light (just don't crash into anything), a 200 lightyear distance may be seen as a 200 year mission (well, slightly more) from the perspective of Earth, but in the spaceship it would be a 28 year journey (according to this calculator: http://www.1728.com/reltivty.htm ).

So it is theoretically possible to visit life on other planets with a single generation of human beings. The problem would come in choosing a suitable planet... and what to do when you get there. Either way, using the figures mentioned. It'd be at least 400 years until the experiment would pay off and yield any payback for the people of earth.

(Minifig @ Sep 30 2009, 20:13)

Also, do you really think that Aliens will take the time to navigate through all of this, to come down and say "Hi!"?

Although I have seen the pictures of the planet comparisons and the Hubble sequences, it never fails to amaze me! We really are totally insignificant in the great scale of things!

Bill Bryson said it best:

Also, do you really think that Aliens will take the time to navigate through all of this, to come down and say "Hi!"?

I dont know exactly where you get they would have to go though half that.

those are based on size

  • 3 weeks later...
The only sensible reason I can think of for extra-terrestrial intelligences to visit us is for some kind of zoological purpose. They'd have to be so far ahead of us to be able to make the trip, that we'd be little more then hairless apes in comparison.

How many people on our planet have traveled the planet to not only study other creatures but just sit and watch? Answer: millions....No reason to think Aliens wouldnt be interested in doing the same to us. Maybe they are doing tv shows the same way we watch NeoGeo on ants or us.

who says they are really that far away anyway :shifty:

ding ding ding, "far away" is subjective. Far away for us now on Earth is not the same as it was just 100 yrs ago.

The weak anthropic principle: "...conditions that are observed in the universe must allow the observer to exist."

The way my professor explained this in laments terms for us at art school was that we exist on the planet earth because the conditions for us to exist are perfect to do so. The right amount of oxygen, gravity, etc. etc. etc.

So if you believe this, then it is not only possible, but also very plausible, that life exists somewhere else in the galaxy. The way he explained that is it might not be life as far as we know it, and said it could be life that we do not even recognize with the human eye.

So just something to think about. What we know as life forms are indeed not the only type of life forms that may exist... thus the term alien.

Maybe they are more intelligent beings, have their own set of measurements and understanding of how things work and are more flexible with it than what we have constructed through our observations. I think it's strange to have probabilities thrown with the vast unknown and our VERY limited knowledge of how the universe and even our own damn selves work, but I guess it makes people feel more comfortable.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Making US citizens pay is a prominent tool? Joke of the week…
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!