VMware announces VMware Fusion 3 details


Recommended Posts

VMware announces VMware Fusion 3 details

VMware has announced that VMware Fusion 3, the next major release of its virtualization solution for running Windows, Linux, and other operating systems on Intel-powered Macs, will ship on October 27. The new version ($80, with an upgrade available for $40) promises more than 50 new features, including changes designed to make it run well in Snow Leopard. The virtualization engine in Fusion 3 is completely 64-bit native, and will run in 64-bit mode under both Leopard and Snow Leopard for users of 64-bit-CPU-equipped Macs.

Fusion 3 also offers greatly improved graphics support, including support for OpenGL 2.1 and DirectX 9.0c Shader Model 3. For the first time in Fusion, users will be able to use the ?Aero? visual effects in both Windows 7 and Windows Vista.

Users of physical Windows machines looking to move to Fusion 3 on the Mac will find the task has been greatly simplified. A small program on the physical PC is first run, which generates a four-digit code. Users then move to the Mac and run the migration assistant, which will ask for the four-digit code. After providing the code, the Mac will find the physical Windows PC, and set up an identical virtual machine?all without any user intervention.

Fusion Unity mode?whereby the Windows desktop is hidden and Windows applications and windows appear alongside those of OS X?has also been improved over its predecessor. Users will be able to switch between windows of a Windows application using Command-`, as they can in OS X. Windows application icons in the Dock will show a list of open windows when clicked, just like OS X applications in the Dock. You can even use Dock Expos? in Snow Leopard to show just the windows associated with a particular Windows application. Finally, a new Fusion menu bar icon provides access to the items in the Start Menu and on the Task Bar, along with some other often-used tasks.

VMware has worked toward improved performance throughout the application, reducing memory usage where possible and adding small refinements. Dragging windows in Unity mode will be notably faster than before, and CPU usage is lower than it was previously. Users will be able to copy and paste not just text but graphics as well between Windows and OS X. Fusion 3 will support multiple cores in virtual machines, as opposed to the multiple CPUs supported in Fusion 2. Virtual machines will also launch more quickly than they did in Fusion 2.

On the front end, the new virtual machine library overview window loads faster, and shows real time views of your virtual machines?even if its windows are hidden or it?s running in Unity mode. A new simplified interface makes it easier for users to create new virtual machines and handle other routine tasks. Finally, application updates are built right into the program, so users won?t need to visit the web site to download updates.

For those who need technical support, Fusion 3 will offer 18 months of free e-mail tech support (up from 30 days for the current product), as well as the option of $29 per incident phone support?a service option that wasn?t available at all with Fusion 2.

Users can pre-order the full $80 version of VMware Fusion 3 from VMware?s site, the Apple Online Store, and Amazon.com starting Tuesday. Upgrades from prior versions will be available for $40 on October 27 at vmware.com, as well as at all authorized resellers.

souricon.gif News source: Macworld

How does Fusion 3 compare to Parallels?

I've always thought Fusion was a better product than Parallels even since Fusion was in beta status. In my (very unscientific) tests, it seems to perform better than Parallels. It's also more "Mac-like" and less invasive to your system (though Parallels 5 is changing up how it operates to function in a very similar way).

Plus, it has a very large community and tons of "appliances" you can download to get ready-made VMs up and running in no time.

Parallels always felt bloated compared to VMware Fusion. Although I really like what they've done to v5's interface. Haven't seen screen shots of VMWare Fusion 3 yet.

Here you go:

Fusion3_Aero_ars-thumb-640xauto-8959.png

Fusion3_appmenu_ars.png

"Found" a copy and been running it since last night. I can't believe how stable a beta build has been... Win7, Linux, etc. all work great.

For me, though, the single greatest improvement with VMware Fusion 3 is that when setting up a Linux virtual machine, it downloads and installs the VMware Tools BEFORE you actually install your Linux distro. That means as soon as it's installed and you can log in to your user account, the tools you need are already installed and running, which is a major time saver.

For the first time in Fusion, users will be able to use the ?Aero? visual effects in both Windows 7 and Windows Vista.

Why are they focusing on OS X when their main product is Workstation?

They should enable Aero on VMWare Workstation which have virtual machines that use a guest OS that supports Aero

Why are they focusing on OS X when their main product is Workstation?

They should enable Aero on VMWare Workstation which have virtual machines that use a guest OS that supports Aero

VMware Workstation 7.0 will be out soon as well, which is going to support Aero in Vista/7 guests.

Why are they focusing on OS X when their main product is Workstation?

They should enable Aero on VMWare Workstation which have virtual machines that use a guest OS that supports Aero

What is with you and the hate for developers that like to give equal attention to both Windows and OS X?

Fusion probably makes a lot of money for VMware considering there are a lot of switchers that, at first, think they still need to run some specific Windows apps. There are also people, like me, that use it to test things out in a Windows environment or in Windows only software (IE in particular).

Why are they focusing on OS X when their main product is Workstation?

They should enable Aero on VMWare Workstation which have virtual machines that use a guest OS that supports Aero

Why shouldn't they if they're making good money by supporting the Mac platform? Like Elliott I fail to understand this attitude of yours.

Can you run glass with Unity (I'm guessing that's a no)

For obvious reasons: no. Unity is meant to integrate the software in a vm with the OS X environment you're in. That would mean those Unity apps will have to behave the same way as the other apps in OS X. Therefore fancy stuff that only works in Windows won't work.

For me, though, the single greatest improvement with VMware Fusion 3 is that when setting up a Linux virtual machine, it downloads and installs the VMware Tools BEFORE you actually install your Linux distro. That means as soon as it's installed and you can log in to your user account, the tools you need are already installed and running, which is a major time saver.

Fusion 2 introduced the Easy Install feature for Linux as well as Unity for Linux. In Fusion 1 those features were Windows only. The only new thing in Fusion 3 is downloading the VMware Tools if you don't have it on your machine. There is a plus side to this, they might sent out regular updates for their VMware Tools which would increase support for new operating systems (new Linux versions, new Linux distros, etc.).

What is with you and the hate for developers that like to give equal attention to both Windows and OS X?

Fusion probably makes a lot of money for VMware considering there are a lot of switchers that, at first, think they still need to run some specific Windows apps. There are also people, like me, that use it to test things out in a Windows environment or in Windows only software (IE in particular).

VMware already had a product to do virtualisation on your computer with a lot of nifty stuff. The name of that piece of software is Workstation and it works on Windows and Linux. In that regard it's weird that they did not create Workstation for Mac which is exactly what Parallels did do with their workstation virtualisation software. However, OS X has a different interface and different guidelines when compared to Windows/Linux. In that regard it would be weird if they did port Workstation to the Mac. They could have ported it and made it fit in Apple's HIG so it looks and works like any other OS X app. They didn't, they created an entire new product from scratch with the problem that there are some differences between Fusion and the other products such as Workstation and Player (they did document how to overcome those differences).

For obvious reasons: no. Unity is meant to integrate the software in a vm with the OS X environment you're in. That would mean those Unity apps will have to behave the same way as the other apps in OS X. Therefore fancy stuff that only works in Windows won't work.

Applications running in Unity are still fully supported by Windows running in VMware Fusion. There are probably no real technical reasons why they can't use Aero. However, like explained before Aero Glass windows would just display the background you would see on your Windows desktop, so it would look weird in Unity.

  • 3 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This one baffles me...so they are creating a museum based around the Ship of Theseus? A museum is supposed to preserve things. It doesn't really work if the conversation goes, "I gazed upon Starry Night the other day, the colours were beautiful!" "Yeah...I didn't expect Godzilla to show up, though." Create a building devoted to displaying AI work, fine. The rainforest idea sounds interesting and I would consider visiting if they pay me a few bucks. But don't call it a museum...
    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!