Transformers: Dark of the Moon (Transformers 3)


Recommended Posts

Having a transformer the size of a planet just wouldnt work, how would you incorporate the fight scenes? If he is in it, he will be a lot smaller.

Maybe he could of been a size of a Transformer but is able to 'attach' himself to a larger one to become the planet eater?

I'm not sure if Michael Bay would want to make fans up set by doing that, LOL. He would really commit Blasphemy. Also, it would be ridiculous if they'd do that IMO. Plus, wouldn't the Autobots and Decepticons need LOADS of companions? Wouldn't it be odd seeing loads of Transformers on each side all of a sudden? There would be too much of a gap to fill inbetween 2 in 3 if that would be the case. And I'm not sure everyone would want to be forced into reading the comic books before watching the movie.

OK, I just went through the teaser trailer in 1080p frame by frame, and there are a LOT of different transformers shown, if you actually take the time to look (many more than people have been mentioning here). Here are my notes, along with the timeframes that they appear:

1:17-1:19 - Very clearly Optimus Prime's head sideways (note shape of face and antennae on head)

1:25-1:27 - Unidentified head (maybe Ironhide or Jazz) and either an arm or leg

1:30-1:32 - Two different Transformers - one head with shoulders and arms in lower right and one head in upper left of frame (both unknown)

1:33-1:35 - At least 2 Transformers - same head as last on left side of frame, one head and torso in top center frame, possibly one more top right frame (lying down)

1:38-1:39 - Head in center left of frame and hand hanging down above the head of the lefthand astronaut

1:55-1:59 - large head in upper right of frame then panning down into hole to show full body of yellow Transformer

2:01-end - zoom in on yellow Transformer's face

It seems to me that the Autobot's ship crashed on the dark side of the Moon on their way to Earth (following the trail of Megatron, who was already under the Antartic ice cap). In 1969, the earlier Apollo missions noticed the wreckage on the Moon, and then investigated the wreckage in person on the Apollo 11 mission (which is shown in the trailer). The actions of the astronauts somehow woke the ship up (maybe just waking up the yellow Transformer who set to work repairing the rest). They eventually made it to Earth in the events of the first movie.

Also, note that in the final two clips, we have NO sense of scale to go by, so the yellow guy could very well be MUCH larger than people are imagining.

The first face you're talking about could also be Ultra Magnus I assume. We can all guess what is what about what we're seeing in the trailer. But it's all kinda pointless really :p

The first face you're talking about could also be Ultra Magnus I assume.

It is possible, but the face is far more similar to Optimus Prime than Ultra Magnus. Remember, this scene takes place in 1969, long before the events of the first movie, so Optimus Prime has not yet arrived on Earth.

It should also be noted that the yellow guy appears to be seated in what looks like a pilot's chair, lowered into a circular depression (maybe a cockpit).

Here are some screenshots from the scenes I described above, with each of the heads or bodies outlined to be easier to pick out:

post-26908-0-40236900-1293385129.jpg

post-26908-0-19436900-1293385228.jpg

post-26908-0-00459800-1293385244.jpg

post-26908-0-35813500-1293385260.jpg

post-26908-0-39934200-1293385279.jpg

post-26908-0-89828200-1293385298.jpg

post-26908-0-07329200-1293385317.jpg

post-26908-0-96898700-1293385330.jpg

It is possible, but the face is far more similar to Optimus Prime than Ultra Magnus. Remember, this scene takes place in 1969, long before the events of the first movie, so Optimus Prime has not yet arrived on Earth.

Here are some screenshots from the scenes I described above, with each of the heads or bodies outlined to be easier to pick out:

The only problem with the Optimus Prime argument is Optimus' face doesn't look like that until he scans a truck. When he first arrives on earth he doesn't have antennae and his face looks diferent.

The only problem with the Optimus Prime argument is Optimus' face doesn't look like that until he scans a truck. When he first arrives on earth he doesn't have antennae and his face looks diferent.

Well, that could simply be a continuity error (God knows movies are full of them), but we never really do get a clear look at what his face looked like before scanning the truck, as far as I remember (and no, the protoform toy doesn't count, since it doesn't look anything like Optimus Prime does in the movie, before or after scanning the truck).

"Optimus Prime than Ultra Magnus" so you have seen the Ultra Magnus from this storyline? If you've read some of the comics, you should know that Ultra Mangus has had Optimus Prime's look in some. Calling it a continuity error to make it look like it's Optimus Prime is somewhat odd while not having even seen the movie :s

Here's Optimus Prime in protoform before he scanned the truck:

Movie_OptimusPrime_protoform.jpg

All we're doing is just guessing anyways. It might as well be Ultra Magnus as it could make sense that he was trying to stop Megatron on Earth. Maybe him and fellow Autobots knew about Megatron's whereabouts and wanted to stop him from getting the AllSpark.

All we're doing is just guessing anyways.

Very true. However, where are YOU getting the idea that Ultra Magnus is even going to be in this film? Nothing I've read outside of this thread has even hinted at him being in it. And thanks for that image of protoform Optimus Prime. I had tried locating one, but all I could find was images of the toy. It still isn't that definitive though, since we are only seeing the left side of his face, and in the trailer it does appear that the first Transformer doesn't have the antenna on that side when he is uncovered.

One should be able to see a tip of the right antenna in the image with Protoform Optimus Prime tbh :p No one knows which Transformers are going to be in it. My guess about Ultra Magnus is the same as the guesses about Alpha Trion and Unicron. Some new ones are a fact, some aren't. It's why I said that all we can and are doing is guess.

I could ask the same question like you did; where's everyone getting the idea that Unicron is even going to be in this movie?. Where's everyone getting the idea that Alpha Trion is even going to be in this movie?

1:17-1:19 - Very clearly Optimus Prime's head sideways (note shape of face and antennae on head)

I'm not sure that's Optimus. Take a look:

post-15711-0-76135500-1293400914.png

You're right about not having anything to campaire the sense of scale to; the last robot could be much bigger in fact. Much, much bigger!

What if the whole Moon is Unicron, laying there dormant for millions of years, collecting space dust?

I know this may sound stupid, but if it is Unicron, he doesn't look "evil", this guy looks like a good guy since he doesn't really have the visual characteristics to be someone bad i.e. Megatron. Hollywood aren't afraid to make bad guys look bad and good guys look good.

I'm not sure that's Optimus. Take a look:

Take a look at what? That is the same as the image I posted above (although I cropped and rotated it). I compared it to every image I could find of Optimus Prime from the other movies (other than the protoform image, as we discussed above), and the general shape and features are a dead match for him, other than missing the antenna on the left side of his head.

One should be able to see a tip of the right antenna in the image with Protoform Optimus Prime tbh :p

Not necessarily, due to the camera angle in that shot. And, although I certainly don't consider it definitive, the protoform Optimus Prime toy DOES have antennas, although they are shorter than those of the regular movie version.

post-26908-0-56079100-1293421432.jpg

Well, that could simply be a continuity error (God knows movies are full of them), but we never really do get a clear look at what his face looked like before scanning the truck, as far as I remember (and no, the protoform toy doesn't count, since it doesn't look anything like Optimus Prime does in the movie, before or after scanning the truck).

Take a look at what? That is the same as the image I posted above (although I cropped and rotated it). I compared it to every image I could find of Optimus Prime from the other movies (other than the protoform image, as we discussed above), and the general shape and features are a dead match for him, other than missing the antenna on the left side of his head.

Not necessarily, due to the camera angle in that shot. And, although I certainly don't consider it definitive, the protoform Optimus Prime toy DOES have antennas, although they are shorter than those of the regular movie version.

lol. So if the toy doesn't support your theory it doesn't count, but if it does support you, it suddenly does count :p

Great analysis, roadwarrior. My guess is that the transformer shown in the first image (where a head is shown sideways) is Ultra Magnus. I've looked around the web and did a rough comparison of that head, Ultra Magnus, and Optimus Prime (as he was protrayed in the two Transformers movies). With Optimus Prime, the antennae on the side of his head are slightly angled inward. Ultra Magnus has antennae as well; however, they are straight.

399222305.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. What???
    • What part of "you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever" is not clear enough?
    • Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      165
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!