Transformers: Dark of the Moon (Transformers 3)


Recommended Posts

lol. So if the toy doesn't support your theory it doesn't count, but if it does support you, it suddenly does count :p

Notice in the part that you didn't put in bold I said that I don't consider it definitive.

Nah, I'm not seeing it...

So, who's head is this? It could be Shockwave.

transformers3darkofthem.jpgTransformers-Dark-Of-The-Moon.jpg

The one on the left is clearly Soundwave, as he appeared in ROTF, but the one on the right is most likely Shockwave, since he has most often been shown with one central, cyclops-like, eye.

It could of been protoform Transformers, because think of it, how fast did Optimus etc get to Earth when Bumblebee signalled them?

They got there really damned fast, which is why my theory is that the crashed ship on the moon was where the other Autobots (Optimus Prime, Ratchet, Ironhide, and Jazz) were hiding out until their recon (Bumblebee) signaled that he had found evidence of the Allspark.

Take a look at what? That is the same as the image I posted above (although I cropped and rotated it). I compared it to every image I could find of Optimus Prime from the other movies (other than the protoform image, as we discussed above), and the general shape and features are a dead match for him, other than missing the antenna on the left side of his head.

Not necessarily, due to the camera angle in that shot. And, although I certainly don't consider it definitive, the protoform Optimus Prime toy DOES have antennas, although they are shorter than those of the regular movie version.

I meant that if you're theory was right, that the one with the antenna on the right would Optimus Prime. If that where to be true, then the tip of that antenna would've been seen in the protoform image that I posted.

@Anaron: I really hope it's Ultra Magnus. If it is, I'm hoping he's going to be awakened in this movie :D

If that where to be true, then the tip of that antenna would've been seen in the protoform image that I posted.

Except that when he was on the ship, it is unlikely that he would have been in protoform mode. Several sources that I've read state that the protoform mode (in the context of the movies) is only used when travelling directly in space such as entry into the Earth's atmosphere, as seen in the first movie. The protoforms lack a lot of their distinguishing characteristics, so even their heads would probably lack a lot of the details that they normally have. Notice in the other shots from the trailer, the other Transformers that you see have a lot of detail in their heads, so they also are probably not in protoform mode.

http://www.unicron.us/tf2007/toypix/protoformoptimusprime.htm

Below is listed an excerpt from the Transformers, movie Guide Book, written by Simon Furman. Therein, Mr. Furman provides this explanation of Protoforms:

"Trans-Scanning, Local Camouflage: Chameleons by nature, Transofmers are constantly adapting their forms either to blend in on other worlds or to traverse the vast distance between them. In preparation for deep space travel, a Transformer will shed its current exo-structure, returning to its most basic form, a protoform, before transforming into a protective transition mode. Transformers can trans-scan a vehicle or life form and reformat their own protoform, adopting a new exo structure.

Regarding the alternate travel mode, space dust and ice coat the transition mode in motion, creating the illusion of a comet or meteor.

I hope it's the White version of Optimus then. :D

The white semi in the movie has been all but confirmed to be Megatron. If Ultra Magnus was going to be in this movie, you would think that there would be SOME evidence of him in all of the pictures of the filming that have been posted. It wouldn't make sense for him to be anything other than a large white truck, similar to Optimus Prime. The lack of any such truck (other than the one that is most likely Megatron) present during the filming is pretty damning evidence against him having a part in the movie.

Any info about Galvatron and Blur appearing in this movie?

A photo of Blur:

blur1.jpg

Isn't that simply one of the NASCAR Transformers? The shape is similar, but the colors don't seem to match the ones that are known to be in the movie. And that is a pretty blurry picture LOL. It almost looks like a toy car sitting on a tile floor to me.

The white semi in the movie has been all but confirmed to be Megatron. If Ultra Magnus was going to be in this movie, you would think that there would be SOME evidence of him in all of the pictures of the filming that have been posted. It wouldn't make sense for him to be anything other than a large white truck, similar to Optimus Prime. The lack of any such truck (other than the one that is most likely Megatron) present during the filming is pretty damning evidence against him having a part in the movie.

I wouldn't be too sure about having seen all the Transformers. There's not a single trace of Alpha Trion nor Unicron for that matter either besides the trailer.

@Razorwing: IF Ultra Magnus really is going to be in this movie, I'm hoping for a somewhat original design for him. As in; not a direct copy of Optimus Prime.

I wouldn't be too sure about having seen all the Transformers. There's not a single trace of Alpha Trion nor Unicron for that matter either besides the trailer.

@Razorwing: IF Ultra Magnus really is going to be in this movie, I'm hoping for a somewhat original design for him. As in; not a direct copy of Optimus Prime.

Really? I would like for him to be like the Cartoon. So his car mode will be the same as Optimus (but with a blue and white paint) and his robot mode should be original. And somewhere in the film he has to say "open damnit". :laugh:

^It would be awesome if it where to be like the cartoon. And I bet you'd only hear geeks laugh in theaters ones he'll say that :p At least I will LOL. Would be epic if he'd say that :p

I wouldn't be too sure about having seen all the Transformers. There's not a single trace of Alpha Trion nor Unicron for that matter either besides the trailer.

Yes, but unless they are intending to have him totally CGI, unlike all of the other Autobots, there would have been SOME shots of his vehicle mode by now, don't you think? They were able to do that with Megatron on the previous movies because for the most part, he was all CGI, but I really can't see them doing that with Ultra Magnus (hell, they didn't even do it with Megatron for this one!).

What other bots would you all like to see in this movie?

Do the smoldering remains of Skids and Mudflap count? They were ALMOST as annoying as Jar Jar Binks. I say "almost" because they did at least serve some useful purpose. Other than that, I'd love to see Hound, perhaps done as either a new Jeep Grand Cherokee or an acutal military Humvee (since he was typically a military Jeep in most previous versions of his character). He is one of my son's favorite Transformer toys (along with nearly every version of Bumblebee made in the last few years!).

Do the smoldering remains of Skids and Mudflap count? They were ALMOST as annoying as Jar Jar Binks. I say "almost" because they did at least serve some useful purpose. Other than that, I'd love to see Hound, perhaps done as either a new Jeep Grand Cherokee or an acutal military Humvee (since he was typically a military Jeep in most previous versions of his character). He is one of my son's favorite Transformer toys (along with nearly every version of Bumblebee made in the last few years!).

Are you a transformer? Id like to see you in the film, you seem to know whats going on more than Shia LaBeouf :p

Are you a transformer?

No, just someone who has been a fan since they first came out in the US in the early 80's (FYI, I'm 39 right now).

Thundercracker and Skywarp together with Starscream would be nice.

Those would be cool too, and the toys have already been made (although they are outrageously expensive for a simple repaint, IMHO).

Those would be cool too, and the toys have already been made (although they are outrageously expensive for a simple repaint, IMHO).

In Transformers Armada, it was nice to see Starscream remembering Thundercracker. :)

But the original Starscream in the 80's with Chris Latta's voice will always be the best. :cool:

Yes, but unless they are intending to have him totally CGI, unlike all of the other Autobots, there would have been SOME shots of his vehicle mode by now, don't you think? They were able to do that with Megatron on the previous movies because for the most part, he was all CGI, but I really can't see them doing that with Ultra Magnus (hell, they didn't even do it with Megatron for this one!).

We haven't seen Shockwave either actually. Also, there's the head on a stick with a transformer who looked to have a weird Einstein look. No one knows which Transformer that's going to be. Who knows what's going to happen. You can't really rule out any idea at this point.

We haven't seen Shockwave either actually. Also, there's the head on a stick with a transformer who looked to have a weird Einstein look. No one knows which Transformer that's going to be. Who knows what's going to happen. You can't really rule out any idea at this point.

Let's all be honest, we haven't even see all the production photos. Only mostly what was shot in those photos back in October/January. Also, Shockwave was in the original film -- as a satelitte so we know he'll return for that, it's just his alterform that's the problem.

Also, there's the head on a stick with a transformer who looked to have a weird Einstein look. No one knows which Transformer that's going to be.

Well, according to a report linked to the Wikipedia article on the movie, it is the blue Mercedes, and it is an Autobot (but no name yet).

Let's all be honest, we haven't even see all the production photos. Only mostly what was shot in those photos back in October/January.

There are photos and video all over the internet taken by people who are around during the filming in the city streets. Hell, there are even several different videos of Bumblebee's wreck! We aren't talking about production photos, we are talking about pictures taken by average people who just happen to live in the cities where they are filming. It would be rather hard to hide a large white truck (if Ultra Magnus is indeed in this, and not totally CGI).

Also, Shockwave was in the original film -- as a satelitte so we know he'll return for that, it's just his alterform that's the problem.

You are confusing Shockwave with Soundwave (and he was in the second film, not the first).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!