Transformers: Dark of the Moon (Transformers 3)


Recommended Posts

^That's what I thought about the new Megatron as well the instant I saw it.

He should be called Megatron Repair then :laugh:

Had half of his face blown off (think Two Face from Batman, which supposedly is the reason for the cape in the new movie), and was otherwise severely damaged from his fight with Optimus Prime. Starscream convinced him to retreat, saying something like "I'd never call you a coward, but sometimes cowards do survive". AFAIK, Megatron, Starscream, and Soundwave are the only 3 of the Decepticons on or near Earth known to survive the final battle.

There's still Barricade who disappeared from the first movie.

^He changed his disguise from TF1 to TF2 as well. It's so that the Autobots can't find him I guess. He stood out way to much on Earth as a futuristic airplane and futuristic tank.

Also, we haven't read or seen anything of the story for TF3 besides the teaser and a few stabs into the wild. So no one can really know for sure. All I know is that those 2 things are plausible.

^He changed his disguise from TF1 to TF2 as well.

Technically, he didn't change his alt mode, Scalpel changed it for him when they took parts from Scrapmetal to repair the damage he suffered during the first movie. I'm thnking that at least part of the reason for him finally taking on a disguise is the comment by Starscream at the end of ROTF about cowards surviving.

By the way, I've though about one other thing: Scalpel probably survived ROTF as well since, unless I missed it, he didn't participate in the final battle and wasn't injured or destroyed when Optimus Prime and Bumblebee rescued Sam from Megatron and Starscream earlier in the movie.

What happened to Megatron at the end of the last movie? I can't remember.

he is all crippled up (lost a foot & arm) thanks to optimus when he got power boot, personally i think we will see galvatron very early in TF3 :/

Technically, he didn't change his alt mode, Scalpel changed it for him when they took parts from Scrapmetal to repair the damage he suffered during the first movie. I'm thnking that at least part of the reason for him finally taking on a disguise is the comment by Starscream at the end of ROTF about cowards surviving.

By the way, I've though about one other thing: Scalpel probably survived ROTF as well since, unless I missed it, he didn't participate in the final battle and wasn't injured or destroyed when Optimus Prime and Bumblebee rescued Sam from Megatron and Starscream earlier in the movie.

They destroyed a Deception under water to revive Megatron. I believe Scalpel had nothing to do with it. I never really literally meant that HE had changed it, all I meant was that his disguise changed in Transformers 2.

They destroyed a Deception under water to revive Megatron. I believe Scalpel had nothing to do with it.

I've watched the movie countless times with my older son over the last couple of weeks since he's been out of school for Christmas (at almost 5 years old, he is a total Transformers fanatic, and can change his toys back and forth better than I can!), and trust me, Scalpel is there doing the "surgery" on Megatron. He is the one who tells the other Decepticons to "kill ze little one" (Scrapmetal).

Wouldn't it be cool if Optimus kept the parts donated to him by JetFire, to make him look like one real bad ass truck?

He shed those parts after his fight with Megatron and The Fallen at the end of ROTF.

I suspect this film will be crap like the last one

The only people who really seemed to think it was "crap" were movie critics who gave it horrible reviews. It did better at the box office than the first one did (better even than a lot of movies that got good reviews and even Oscar winners!). Sure, it had its weak parts, but all in all it was s really fun and entertaining movie.

I'm really of the opinion that most movie critics are totally out of touch with the reality of what MOST people really like in a movie. I can almost guarantee that if a movie critic hates a movie, it is probably going to be a box office hit, and one that I will love.

If movie critics and the Acadamy Awards had their way, we'd only have POS movies like "The Hurt Locker". Critics and awards shows don't tell us how good a movie is, we tell the studios by ticket sales, and ROTF wipes the floor with a LOT of movies that got far better reviews and even tons of Oscars.

And what, just left them in Egypt? Surely he'd keep them...

It was a one-time use thing. Most of the parts were badly damaged too. And not to mention, incompatible with his vehicle form. It's like trying to curl up with a suit of armour. It just doesn't work.

It was a one-time use thing. Most of the parts were badly damaged too. And not to mention, incompatible with his vehicle form. It's like trying to curl up with a suit of armour. It just doesn't work.

Yeah, but every molecule in the transformers body is dynamic; the parts could easily transform to become something more compatible, like a Jet-Truck. Come on man, use your imagination, where's the child within you?

Optimus getting the rocket upgrade at the end was about as awful as Robocop flying at the end of Robocop 3. It felt like it was thrown into the film to give the audience a, "WHOA! COOOOOL!!" moment, deus ex machina style. Hoping the third doesn't suck like the second.

Yeah, but every molecule in the transformers body is dynamic; the parts could easily transform to become something more compatible, like a Jet-Truck. Come on man, use your imagination, where's the child within you?

This doesn't really make sense in Bay's movies tbh. If this could work, then they would've used all the other destroyed Transformer as well.

@roadwarrior: Ah yes, now I remember. Guess this is my excuse to rewatch both movie 1 and 2 :p

@FusionOpz: Go have a look through this thread. There are photos posted with Optimus Prime's Trailer :)

@roadwarrior: Ah yes, now I remember. Guess this is my excuse to rewatch both movie 1 and 2 :p

I swear, I think I catch something new every time I watch ROTF. The action scenes are so visually dense that you really have to watch it multiple times to catch some of the things going on in the background. Many of the things that people complain about (such as the individual vehicles that make up Devastator also being present in other battle scenes while they should be attached to him) can also have a perfectly reasonable explanation (there were simply multiple versions of the consturction vehicles: the individual robots and also the components of Devastator, which you never see turn into robots).

I swear, I think I catch something new every time I watch ROTF. The action scenes are so visually dense that you really have to watch it multiple times to catch some of the things going on in the background. Many of the things that people complain about (such as the individual vehicles that make up Devastator also being present in other battle scenes while they should be attached to him) can also have a perfectly reasonable explanation (there were simply multiple versions of the consturction vehicles: the individual robots and also the components of Devastator, which you never see turn into robots).

Woah, I've watched the movie countless times but didn't realise that haha!

I swear, I think I catch something new every time I watch ROTF. The action scenes are so visually dense that you really have to watch it multiple times to catch some of the things going on in the background. Many of the things that people complain about (such as the individual vehicles that make up Devastator also being present in other battle scenes while they should be attached to him) can also have a perfectly reasonable explanation (there were simply multiple versions of the consturction vehicles: the individual robots and also the components of Devastator, which you never see turn into robots).

to be more specific you see some of the Constructicons in robot mode when they are searching for Sam and Mikalea in the shed/house thing. Also, if you look closesly at the Decepticon arrival , you also see Bonecrusher in vehicle mode.

to be more specific you see some of the Constructicons in robot mode when they are searching for Sam and Mikalea in the shed/house thing. Also, if you look closesly at the Decepticon arrival , you also see Bonecrusher in vehicle mode.

Yes, exactly. Bonecrusher surviving the first movie isn't necessarily impossible. Other Transformers were shown to be decapitated and still survive (Frenzy), and Bonecrusher's remains are never seen after the freeway battle (they aren't shown being dumped into the ocean at the end). As for Devastator and the Constructicons, it is entirely possible (and plausible) that the vehicles that make up Devastator are NOT the same ones that are seen fighting as robots in the other scenes. There are a BUNCH of Decepticon protoforms that fall to Earth just before the battle, certainly enough to account for two complete sets of construction vehicles. And we already know that at in at least two diferent cases, more than one Decepticon scanned similar vehicles (Blackout and Grindor both scanned similar helicoptors, and one part of Devastator is the same type of excavator as Demolisher that Optimus Prime destroyed at the beginning of the movie, although their colors are opposite of each other).

Yes, exactly. Bonecrusher surviving the first movie isn't necessarily impossible. Other Transformers were shown to be decapitated and still survive (Frenzy), and Bonecrusher's remains are never seen after the freeway battle (they aren't shown being dumped into the ocean at the end). As for Devastator and the Constructicons, it is entirely possible (and plausible) that the vehicles that make up Devastator are NOT the same ones that are seen fighting as robots in the other scenes. There are a BUNCH of Decepticon protoforms that fall to Earth just before the battle, certainly enough to account for two complete sets of construction vehicles. And we already know that at in at least two diferent cases, more than one Decepticon scanned similar vehicles (Blackout and Grindor both scanned similar helicoptors, and one part of Devastator is the same type of excavator as Demolisher that Optimus Prime destroyed at the beginning of the movie, although their colors are opposite of each other).

Sounds like a stretch to think multiple robots would take on virtually identical forms, save the twins. No need for excuses, they screwed up and Bay knows it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!