Transformers: Dark of the Moon (Transformers 3)


Recommended Posts

I swear, I think I catch something new every time I watch ROTF. The action scenes are so visually dense that you really have to watch it multiple times to catch some of the things going on in the background. Many of the things that people complain about (such as the individual vehicles that make up Devastator also being present in other battle scenes while they should be attached to him) can also have a perfectly reasonable explanation (there were simply multiple versions of the consturction vehicles: the individual robots and also the components of Devastator, which you never see turn into robots).

There's even loads of Transformers in the comic books that look like each other. It's bound to happen really. Also, you should check out the making off from ROTF. It's an 1 hour in playtime I believe and really interesting. Specially when you find out that Bay was still working on color corrections, by using video call, a few hours before the premiere.

There's even loads of Transformers in the comic books that look like each other. It's bound to happen really. Also, you should check out the making off from ROTF. It's an 1 hour in playtime I believe and really interesting. Specially when you find out that Bay was still working on color corrections, by using video call, a few hours before the premiere.

Where can I see that?

Sounds like a stretch to think multiple robots would take on virtually identical forms, save the twins. No need for excuses, they screwed up and Bay knows it.

The twins didn't. Skids was a Chevy Beat and Mudflap was a Chevy Trax, two very different cars (although roughly the same size). The two helicopters, Blackout and Grindor both took on virtually identical forms (MH-53 Pave Low and CH-53 Sea Stallion), and the two excavators are quite obviously the same type, but different characters, so why is it so unbelieveable that when a large group of Decpticon protoforms landed in the middle of the desert, near what appears to be an open pit mine, that more than one of them would each scan the same vehicle? Remember that protoforms need to scan an alt-mode roughly similar in mass to their normal body, and there likely weren't a huge number of vehicles in the area to choose from that were large enough for them to use. If you watch and listen carefully, there are well over a dozen protoforms that impact in the desert, more than enough for all of the construction vehicles to be scanned more than once.

So which one is the real Ultra Magnus?

Shots before:

post-26908-0-97557200-1293656921.jpg

Wikipedia's Page:

Universespychangerultramganus.jpg

The toy I had looked more like this:

http://members.wri.com/jeffb/transformers/UltraMagnus.jpg[/img]

Depends on which version you want to choose: http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Ultra_Magnus

The one from the 2008 Animated series is a similar type of vehicle: Leaderanimatedultramagnus.jpg

There's also Inferno, who is a fire truck in most versions, but supposedly the producers have stated emphatically that the fire truck in the movie IS NOT Inferno.

I am not digging the clothed Megatron. Seemed like a total rip off of Repair Exia from Gundam 00. If noone knows about it, here's a pic.

GundamExiaRepair.jpg

Thank you! I'm so glad I wasn't the only one who had that come to mind when seeing caped Megatron. :D

Voice Actor Bill Fagerbakke will lend his voice to Transformers: Dark of the Moon.

Probably best known for his work as the lovely idiot Patrick Star on the Nickelodeon hit show, Spongebob Squarepants, Bill Fagerbakke has been confirmed to be voicing one of the Chevy Impalas in third installment of Transformers.

If you are keen on voice actors and know a little bit about Mr. Fagerbakke, then you'll recognize him as the voice of Bulkhead from Transformers Animated also.

Regarding the news, there were two types of Chevrolet Impalas on the set during Transformers 3 filming; NASCAR Wreckers and an Orange-Black stock car. The Wreckers have also been confirmed to be Transformers as well.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/news/?a=27419

Anyone else think Leonard Nimoy will reprise his vocal role as GalvaTron?

BTW, who is this?

The caption read as Galvatron but it doesn't look like him to me:

Perhaps he's UltraTron.

Anyway, this is what Galvatron should look like:

Both of those appear to be custom figures that someone made.

@TonyLock: UltraTron? You making up new characters up now? Also, the making-off can indeed be seen on the Special Edition DVD. Also, who said anything about Galvatron being in this movie?

@TonyLock: UltraTron? You making up new characters up now? Also, the making-off can indeed be seen on the Special Edition DVD. Also, who said anything about Galvatron being in this movie?

Ultratron? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

0.jpg

maybe? :laugh:

Well, you never know. Who knows if Bay will introduce Mangatron or even Galvinator?

So far he has stuck with fairly well known characters, and there are plenty of others he could still use, so why would he need to make up any new names?

Chinese website Taobao has posted a look at two Legends class toys from the Transformers: Dark of the Moon toyline. The figures seem to be the Transformers for the blue NASCAR vehicle and the black Decepticon suburbans that were part of the filming of the movie over the summer.

See Pictures HERE

Those look sort of cool, but being Legends class, very simplistic. Funny that they are sitting on the cardback for Dead End. I just picked that one up for my son on clearance at TRU the other day, along with Jolt. One of the side windows/wings promptly broke off due to the brittle plastic surrounding the hinge, but it works OK without it (it simply looks like he has his passenger side window rolled down when in vehicle mode).

Well, you never know. Who knows if Bay will introduce Mangatron or even Galvinator?

You can dream on with that thought :p

@Razorwing: Oh god :rofl:

Also, those toys are looking rather odd.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!