Transformers: Dark of the Moon (Transformers 3)


Recommended Posts

Also, those toys are looking rather odd.

Those are Legends class toys (barely bigger than Hot Wheels cars). I'm looking forward to seeing some Deluxe and Voyager class stuff (and Leader class, of course). I rarely ever see anything in Legends or Scout class worth getting (other than the fact that the only way to get a version of Arcee that is even close to the right scale compared to a Deluxe class car such as Bumblebee, you have to get a Scout class version of her).

^I didn't mean toy-wise. I meant Transformer-wise :p

Well, you did say the toys looked odd. And Legends class toys often do, due to the size that they have to work with. Ironically though, there are some cases where the Legends class version of a toy is actually more screen-accurate than the larger versions (Devastator being a good example).

Megatron looks pretty puny next to that Voyager Optimus Prime. I'd almost swear that Megatron was supposed to be Deluxe class instead of Voyager. That is just horrible. Why the **** is it so hard for Hasbro to simply pick a scale and stick to it? They manage to do it with their other toy lines (G.I. Joe and Star Wars in particular), and other companies manage to do it, but Hasbro simply refuses to make a consistant scale for Transformers (and they always have). Some of the older characters I can understand, but it really shouldn't be that hard for them to make a movie series in one consistant scale. The best you can do is mix and match between several different classes of toys to get a somewhat accurate set (and even then, you can't get a really complete set).

Linkin Park, which has pretty much emerged as the troubadours of the Transformers franchise after releasing the song "What I've Done" for the original movie and "New Divide" for Revenge of the Fallen, may be featured on the third movie's soundtrack as well. Michael Bay has reportedly picked their new song "Burning in the Skies" to be featured in the movie, and chords from the song may end up being incorporated into the film's score, just like with their songs in the first two movies. [TFLAMB]

45f05881.jpg

1b24a62c.jpg

Michael Bay hopes that Tranformers: Dark Of The Moon will make audiences/fans forget about Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.

Bay admitted to the LA Times that ?It was kind of a mess, wasn?t it?? Bay had some interesting points to say about regret in regards to the film, he said:

?Look, the movie had some good things in it and it was entertaining and it did very well, but it also failed in some key ways. I learned from it. And now with this third movie we?re going back to basics and I absolutely believe this is going to be a much better film than the second one.?

While being interviewed on the set of the new film he reminisced about his reaction to Steven Spielberg coming to him with the idea for the franchise he said, ?The term I used at the time was ?stupid idea,? if I remember right,? The director had a major change of heart after visiting with Hasbro and learning about the characters and cosmic mythology surrounding them.

The Transformers franchise is what the director will be remembered for most out his career. He currently has no expectation of making a fourth installment. As a result he is working diligently to end the franchise on a high note. Bay goes on to say,

?I?m still having fun and especially with this movie. Look, we got burned on the last movie. The big thing was the writers strike, it hurt the film and it made it hard on everybody. We had three weeks to get our story and, really, we were going into the movie without a script. It?s tough to do that. It was too big of a movie. There were too many endings or too many things thatfelt like endings. There was so much animation [in the visual effects postproduction work], too, and we ran out of time. We used the schedule of the first movie for the second movie but on the second one way more labor was needed for the animation. And then it felt like we were writing the script in the edit room, trying to put together a story.?

Bay has not gotten much love from critics with his films as of late. They have all agreed on their distaste for the last Transformers film and for Bays other films, Pearl Harbor, Bad Boys 2 and The Island. In the recent interviw Bay actually has publicly agreed with them.

?I think we have something to prove with this third one. We?re back to basics. The second one was something going on inside of Sam, the way he?s affected and feeling, and that?s a hard thing to do. It?s more mystical, in a way. This one, there?s nothing mystical about it. It?s a good old-fashioned mystery and it?s a tougher movie ? it?s funny but it?s not a wisecrack-funny; it?s funnier in the situation.?

Spielberg brought Bay in to direct the franchise because of the way the director has dealt with humans on screen. Spielberg goes on to say,

?The first chance I ever had to work with Michael Bay was when he directed ?The Island? for DreamWorks and Warner Bros. in 2005. The Island,? while not a commercial success, was successful in showing me how well Michael could deal with relationships within a big conceptual drama. It didn?t take second sight to know how brilliantly he would handle the action between the Autobots and the Decepticons. But because our principal premise for a first ?Transformers? was the story of a girl, a boy and his car, ?The Island? showed me that Michael would pay special attention to the human stories in ?Transformers.? ?

Spielberg went on to say:

?As the plot thickens in the third installment of ?Transformers,? Michael?s work on it feels fresh and energized ? with lots of new and inventive ways of turning a page on this franchise. ?

Bay describes the third film in the franchise as being ?lean and mean.? Bay also revealed that the script written by Ehren Kruger (The Ring) presents more of a small-team, commando tension and compared the film to Black Hawk Down but with giant alien robots instead of Middle East deserts. Dark of the Moon will mostly take place in Chicago where humanity continues to fight for survival.

I am excited for some of the same scenes that Bay is most proud of. He mentioned some cool urban warfare scenes in the film, including sequences where a team of glide-suit commandos fly between skyscrapers like a black-ops version of flying squirrels. Bay also talked about his excitement for the story of the film and the conspiracy mystery that sets up the new story, which traces back to the 1960s space program.

Fans of the first film can excpect John Turturro, Josh Duhamel and Tyrese Gibson to return to the fray. What I am most excited for in the upcoming film is that John Malkovich, Frances McDormand and Patrick Dempsey have joined the cast. I love both Malkovich and McDormand and think they will bring some new life into the film.I may not be in the majority with this next statement, but I am very happy that Megan Fox has been left out of the film. Her performances were some of my main gripes about the first two films.

Bay believes the film is better off without Fox's character and that the movie has more room to move without her and that the cast is stronger this time around. Bay?s excitement faded when asked about Fox in the interview. He went on to mention Rosie Huntington-Whiteley who will play the female lead in the film by saying, ?I don?t want to talk about it, but we obviously replaced our girl, and by everything I see we fared well." He went on to say, ?Look, I will say that I think we have a better cast with this third movie than we?ve ever had.?

Bay also revealed some cool points about the use of 3-D cameras on the set of Dark of the Moon. He talked about his initial feelins on the 3D format after visitng the Avatar set by saing,

?This is so not me.? So it?s kind of scary, all right? Especially because I do real-world stuff ? this is really hard for me because I?m a die-hard film guy, anamorphic old-school lenses, and there?s nothing more beautiful than anamorphic lenses to me. So going digital was just kind of crass for me.?

Bay goes on to talk about his love of technology and his take on the format by saying,

?Have you ever seen these cameras? They?re big. You?ve got the mirrors ? what you?re doing is splitting a mirror, so you get weird refractions. It cuts light. The second camera is always going to be a touch softer because it?s going through a mirror. It sees reflections a little weird. It?ll catch a glare on one eye but it won?t on the other so it will kind of jump out at you sometimes in 3-D.?

http://geektyrant.com/news/2011/1/14/michael-bay-admits-transformers-2-was-kind-of-a-mess-shares.html

Why was Sam not called Spike?

Because, this is not G1. It's just another generation of Transformers, just like all the other alternate storylines. This is also why Optimus and the rest don't look like the G1 Transformers.

Loads of people tend to forget that there are loads of Transformer generations based off of the original. It's actually an important thing to know about this movie. This wont make go and say "Ugh, this is nothing like the original". It's because they never intended this to be like the original G1 series.

@Brian Miller: I wouldn't really count on it.

ComicBookMovie.com has posted an unconfirmed list of trailer dates for the next few months that includes dates for the next two theatrical trailers for Transformers: Dark of the Moon. The trailers are show to come out with "I Am Number 4" on 2/18/11 and "Thor" on 5/5/11. The dates are highly plausible because Number 4 is produced by Michael Bay while Thor is the first tent pole movie of the summer so pairing with the film is ideal. Checking the other films and their trailer companions there is little about the list that doesn't seem realistic. (via All Spark)

Me Grimlock no idea! Me Grimlock love to kick Decepticons butt but Michael Bay no like me!

To be fair, Grimlock was featured in one of the early viral videos done for the first Transformers movies. I think Michael Bay's opinion is that the Dinobots simply don't make sense in the context of the movies (an opinion that I happen to agree with).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!